This change adds a trusted registry (via the source code) of node address to node id mappings (currently only for well known Satellites) to defeat MITM attacks to Satellites. It also extends the uplink UI such that when entering a satellite address by hand, a node id prefix can also be added to defeat MITM attacks with unknown satellites.
When running uplink setup, satellite addresses can now be of the form 12EayRS2V1k@us-central-1.tardigrade.io (not even using a full node id) to ensure that the peer contacted is the peer that was expected. When using a known satellite address, the known node ids are used if no override is provided.
all of the packages and tests work with both grpc and
drpc. we'll probably need to do some jenkins pipelines
to run the tests with drpc as well.
most of the changes are really due to a bit of cleanup
of the pkg/transport.Client api into an rpc.Dialer in
the spirit of a net.Dialer. now that we don't need
observers, we can pass around stateless configuration
to everything rather than stateful things that issue
observations. it also adds a DialAddressID for the
case where we don't have a pb.Node, but we do have an
address and want to assert some ID. this happened
pretty frequently, and now there's no more weird
contortions creating custom tls options, etc.
a lot of the other changes are being consistent/using
the abstractions in the rpc package to do rpc style
things like finding peer information, or checking
status codes.
Change-Id: Ief62875e21d80a21b3c56a5a37f45887679f9412
What: we move api keys out of the grpc connection-level metadata on the client side and into the request protobufs directly. the server side still supports both mechanisms for backwards compatibility.
Why: dRPC won't support connection-level metadata. the only thing we currently use connection-level metadata for is api keys. we need to move all information needed by a request into the request protobuf itself for drpc support. check out the .proto changes for the main details.
One fun side-fact: Did you know that protobuf fields 1-15 are special and only use one byte for both the field number and type? Additionally did you know we don't use field 15 anywhere yet? So the new request header will use field 15, and should use field 15 on all protobufs going forward.
Please describe the tests: all existing tests should pass
Please describe the performance impact: none
* first round cleanup based on go-critic
* more issues resolved for ifelsechain and unlambda checks
* updated from master and gocritic found a new ifElseChain issue
* disable appendAssign. i reports false positives
* re-enabled go-critic appendAssign and disabled lint check at code line level
* fixed go-critic lint error
* fixed // nolint add gocritic specifically