Refactoring of the segments Store interface Get method signature to
force the implementations to not use metainfo Client and be able for the
callers to batch requests.
all of the packages and tests work with both grpc and
drpc. we'll probably need to do some jenkins pipelines
to run the tests with drpc as well.
most of the changes are really due to a bit of cleanup
of the pkg/transport.Client api into an rpc.Dialer in
the spirit of a net.Dialer. now that we don't need
observers, we can pass around stateless configuration
to everything rather than stateful things that issue
observations. it also adds a DialAddressID for the
case where we don't have a pb.Node, but we do have an
address and want to assert some ID. this happened
pretty frequently, and now there's no more weird
contortions creating custom tls options, etc.
a lot of the other changes are being consistent/using
the abstractions in the rpc package to do rpc style
things like finding peer information, or checking
status codes.
Change-Id: Ief62875e21d80a21b3c56a5a37f45887679f9412
What: we move api keys out of the grpc connection-level metadata on the client side and into the request protobufs directly. the server side still supports both mechanisms for backwards compatibility.
Why: dRPC won't support connection-level metadata. the only thing we currently use connection-level metadata for is api keys. we need to move all information needed by a request into the request protobuf itself for drpc support. check out the .proto changes for the main details.
One fun side-fact: Did you know that protobuf fields 1-15 are special and only use one byte for both the field number and type? Additionally did you know we don't use field 15 anywhere yet? So the new request header will use field 15, and should use field 15 on all protobufs going forward.
Please describe the tests: all existing tests should pass
Please describe the performance impact: none
What: this change makes sure the count of segments is not encrypted.
Why: having the segment count encrypted just makes things hard for no reason - a satellite operator can figure out how many segments an object has by looking at the other segments in the database. but if a user has access but has lost their encryption key, they now can't clean up or delete old segments because they can't know how many there are without just guessing until they get errors. :(
Backwards compatibility: clients will still understand old pointers and will still write old pointers. at some point in the future perhaps we can do a migration for remaining old pointers so we can delete the old code.
Please describe the tests: covered by existing tests
Please describe the performance impact: none
* rename pkg/linksharing to linksharing
* rename pkg/httpserver to linksharing/httpserver
* rename pkg/eestream to uplink/eestream
* rename pkg/stream to uplink/stream
* rename pkg/metainfo/kvmetainfo to uplink/metainfo/kvmetainfo
* rename pkg/auth/signing to pkg/signing
* rename pkg/storage to uplink/storage
* rename pkg/accounting to satellite/accounting
* rename pkg/audit to satellite/audit
* rename pkg/certdb to satellite/certdb
* rename pkg/discovery to satellite/discovery
* rename pkg/overlay to satellite/overlay
* rename pkg/datarepair to satellite/repair
