scx_mitosis is a dynamic affinity scheduler which assigns cgroups to
Cells and Cells to discrete sets of CPUs. The number of cells is dynamic
as is the CPU assignment. BPF mostly just does vtime scheduling for each
cell, tracks load, and responds to reconfiguration from userspace.
Userspace makes decisions about how to assign cgroups to cells and cells
to cpus.
This is not yet a complete scheduler, much of the userspace logic is a
placeholder as I experiment with better logic. I also want to add richer
scheduling semantics to userspace, e.g. so that cells can do more
"soft-affinity" rather than the strict partitioning implemented
currently.
Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() macros are added in commit 0932fde, we should
be able to utilize the macros to get around the possibility of data
races for domc->min_vruntime.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
- pick_idle_cpu() was putting idle_smtmask that it didn't acquire.
- layered_enqueue() was unnecessarily entering preemption path after finding
an idle CPU.
- No need to test whether scx_bpf_get_idle_cpu/smtmask() return NULL. They
never do.
- Relocate cctx->yielding test into keep_runinng() from its caller.
scx_lavd: core compaction for low power consumption
When system-wide CPU utilization is low, it is very likely all the CPUs
are running with very low utilization. That means all CPUs run with low
clock frequency thanks to dynamic frequency scaling and very frequently
go in and out from/to C-state. That results in low performance (i.e.,
low clock frequency) and high power consumption (i.e., frequent
P-/C-state transition).
The idea of *core compaction* is using less number of CPUs when
system-wide CPU utilization is low. The chosen cores (called "active
cores") will run in higher utilization and higher clock frequency, and
the rest of the cores (called "idle cores") will be in a C-state for a
much longer duration. Thus, the core compaction can achieve higher
performance with lower power consumption.
One potential problem of core compaction is latency spikes when all the
active cores are overloaded. A few techniques are incorporated to solve
this problem.
1) Limit the active CPU core's utilization below a certain limit (say 50%).
2) Do not use the core compaction when the system-wide utilization is
moderate (say 50%).
3) Do not enforce the core compaction for kernel and pinned user-space
tasks since they are manually optimized for performance.
In my experiments, under a wide range of system-wide CPU utilization
(5%—80%), the core compaction reduces 7-30% power consumption without
sacrificing average and 99p tail latency.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Currently, when preempting, searching for the candidate CPU always starts
from the RR preemption cursor. Let's first try the previous CPU the
preempting task was on as that may have some locality benefits.
When a task is being enqueued outside wakeup path, ops.select_cpu() isn't
called, so we can end up in a situation where a newly enqueued task keeps
waiting in one of the DSQs while there are idle CPUs. Factor out idle CPU
selection path into pick_idle_cpu() and call it from the enqueue path in
such cases. This problem is shared across schedulers and likely needs a more
generic solution in the future.
yield(2) currently gives up the entire slice. Add "yield_ignore" layer
parameter which can modulate the magnitude of yiedling. When 1.0, yields are
completely ignored. 0.5, only half worth of the full slice is given up and
so on.
Currently, a task which yields is treated the same as a task which has run
out its slice. As the budget charged to a task is calculated from wall clock
time, a repeatedly yielding task can stay at the top of the queue for quite
a while hogging the CPU and spiking the number of scheduling events.
Let's add explicit yield support. An yielding task is now always charged the
full slice and not allowed to keep running on the same CPU.
The keep_running path relies on the implicit last task enqueue which makes
the statistics a bit difficult to track. Let's make the enqueue path
comprehensive:
- Set SCX_OPS_ENQ_LAST and handle the last runnable task enqueue explicitly.
- Implement layered_cpu_release() to re-enqueue tasks from a CPU preempted
by a higher pri sched class and handle the re-enqueued tasks explicitly in
layered_enqueue().
- Add more statistics to track all enqueue operations.
When a task exhausts its slice, layered currently doesn't make any effort to
keep it on the same CPU. It dispatches the next task to run and then
enqueues the running one. This leads to suboptimal behaviors. e.g. When this
happens to a task in a preempting layer, the task will most likely find an
idle CPU or a task to preempt and then migrate there causing a completely
unnecessary migration.
This patch layered_dispatch() test whether the current task should keep
running on the CPU and then skip dispatching to keep the task running. This
behavior depends on the implicit local DSQ enqueue mechanism which triggers
when there are no other tasks to run.
- scx_utils: Replace kfunc_exists() with ksym_exists() which doesn't care
about the type of the symbol.
- scx_layered: Fix load failure on kernels >= v6.10-rc due to
scheduler_tick() -> sched_tick rename. Attach the tick fentry function to
either scheduler_tick() or sched_tick().
Make sure to never assign a time slice longer than the default time
slice, that can be used as an upper limit.
This seems to prevent potential stall conditions (reported by the
CachyOS community) when running CPU-intensive workloads, such as:
[ 68.062813] sched_ext: BPF scheduler "rustland" errored, disabling
[ 68.062831] sched_ext: runnable task stall (ollama_llama_se[3312] failed to run for 5.180s)
[ 68.062832] scx_watchdog_workfn+0x154/0x1e0
[ 68.062837] process_one_work+0x18e/0x350
[ 68.062839] worker_thread+0x2fa/0x490
[ 68.062841] kthread+0xd2/0x100
[ 68.062842] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
[ 68.062844] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Fixes: 6f4cd853 ("scx_rustland: introduce virtual time slice")
Tested-by: SoulHarsh007 <harsh.peshwani@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <piotrgorski@cachyos.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Overview
========
Currently, a task's time slice is determined based on the total number
of tasks waiting to be scheduled: the more overloaded the system, the
shorter the time slice.
This approach can help to reduce the average wait time of all tasks,
allowing them to progress more slowly, but uniformly, thus providing a
smoother overall system performance.
However, under heavy system load, this approach can lead to very short
time slices distributed among all tasks, causing excessive context
switches that can badly affect soft real-time workloads.
Moreover, the scheduler tends to operate in a bursty manner (tasks are
queued and dispatched in bursts). This can also result in fluctuations
of longer and shorter time slices, depending on the number of tasks
still waiting in the scheduler's queue.
Such behavior can also negatively impact on soft real-time workloads,
such as real-time audio processing.
Virtual time slice
==================
To mitigate this problem, introduce the concept of virtual time slice:
the idea is to evaluate the optimal time slice of a task, considering
the vruntime as a deadline for the task to complete its work before
releasing the CPU.
This is accomplished by calculating the difference between the task's
vruntime and the global current vruntime and use this value as the task
time slice:
task_slice = task_vruntime - min_vruntime
In this way, tasks that "promise" to release the CPU quickly (based on
their previous work pattern) get a much higher priority (due to
vruntime-based scheduling and the additional priority boost for being
classified as interactive), but they are also given a shorter time slice
to complete their work and fulfill their promise of rapidity.
At the same time tasks that are more CPU-intensive get de-prioritized,
but they will tend to have a longer time slice available, reducing in
this way the amount of context switches that can negatively affect their
performance.
In conclusion, latency-sensitive tasks get a high priority and a short
time slice (and they can preempt other tasks), CPU-intensive tasks get
low priority and a long time slice.
Example
=======
Let's consider the following theoretical scenario:
task | time
-----+-----
A | 1
B | 3
C | 6
D | 6
In this case task A represents a short interactive task, task C and D
are CPU-intensive tasks and task B is mainly interactive, but it also
requires some CPU time.
With a uniform time slice, scaled based on the amount of tasks, the
scheduling looks like this (assuming the time slice is 2):
A B B C C D D A B C C D D C C D D
| | | | | | | | |
`---`---`---`-`-`---`---`---`----> 9 context switches
With the virtual time slice the scheduling changes to this:
A B B C C C D A B C C C D D D D D
| | | | | | |
`---`-----`-`-`-`-----`----------> 7 context switches
In the latter scenario, tasks do not receive the same time slice scaled
by the total number of tasks waiting to be scheduled. Instead, their
time slice is adjusted based on their previous CPU usage. Tasks that
used more CPU time are given longer slices and their processing time
tends to be packed together, reducing the amount of context switches.
Meanwhile, latency-sensitive tasks can still be processed as soon as
they need to, because they get a higher priority and they can preempt
other tasks. However, they will get a short time slice, so tasks that
were incorrectly classified as interactive will still be forced to
release the CPU quickly.
Experimental results
====================
This patch has been tested on a on a 8-cores AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core
Processor (16 threads with SMT), 16GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070.
The test case involves the usual benchmark of playing a video game while
simultaneously overloading the system with a parallel kernel build
(`make -j32`).
The average frames per second (fps) reported by Steam is used as a
metric for measuring system responsiveness (the higher the better):
Game | before | after | delta |
---------------------------+---------+---------+--------+
Baldur's Gate 3 | 40 fps | 48 fps | +20.0% |
Counter-Strike 2 | 8 fps | 15 fps | +87.5% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 41 fps | 46 fps | +12.2% |
Terraria | 98 fps | 108 fps | +10.2% |
Team Fortress 2 | 81 fps | 92 fps | +13.6% |
WebGL demo (firefox) [1] | 32 fps | 42 fps | +31.2% |
---------------------------+---------+---------+--------+
Apart from the massive boost with Counter-Strike 2 (that should be taken
with a grain of salt, considering the overall poor performance in both
cases), the virtual time slice seems to systematically provide a boost
in responsiveness of around +10-20% fps.
It also seems to significantly prevent potential audio cracking issues
when the system is massively overloaded: no audio cracking was detected
during the entire run of these tests with the virtual deadline change
applied.
[1] https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Make restart handling with user_exit_info simpler and consistently use the
load and report macros consistently across the rust schedulers. This makes
all schedulers automatically handle auto restarts from CPU hotplug events.
Note that this is necessary even for scx_lavd which has CPU hotplug
operations as CPU hotplug operations which took place between skel open and
scheduler init can still trigger restart.
In cpumask_intersects_domain(), we check whether a given cpumask has any
CPUs in common with the specified domain by looking at the const, static
dom_cpumasks map. This map is only really necessary when creating the
domain struct bpf_cpumask objects at scheduler load time. After that, we
can just use the actual struct bpf_cpumask object embedded in the domain
context. Let's use that and cpumask kfuncs instead.
This allows rusty to load with
https://github.com/sched-ext/sched_ext/pull/216.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Commit 23b0bb5f ("scx_rustland: dispatch interactive tasks on any CPU")
allows only interactive tasks to be dispatched on any CPU, enabling them
to quickly use the first idle CPU available. Non-interactive tasks, on
the other hand, are kept on the same CPU as much as possible.
This change deprioritizes CPU-intensive tasks further, but it also helps
to exploit cache locality, while latency-sensitive tasks are dispatched
sooner, improving overall responsiveness, despite the potential
migration cost.
Given this new logic, the built-idle option, which forces all tasks to
be dispatched on the CPU assigned during select_cpu(), no longer offers
significant benefits. It would merely reduce the responsiveness of
interactive tasks.
Therefore, simply remove this option, allowing the scheduler to
determine the target CPU(s) for all tasks based on their nature.
Fixes: 23b0bb5f ("scx_rustland: dispatch interactive tasks on any CPU")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
In order to prevent compiler from merging or refetching load/store
operations or unwanted reordering, we take the implemetation of
READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() from kernel sources under
"/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h".
Use WRITE_ONCE() in function flip_sys_cpu_util() to ensure the compiler
doesn't perform unnecessary optimization so the compiler won't make
incorrect assumptions when performing the operation of modifying of bit
flipping.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
layered_dispatch() was incorrectly continuing down to the lower priority
DSQs after successfully consuming from HI_FALLBACK_DSQ which can lead to
latency issues. Fix it.
The main reason why custom affinities are tricky for scx_layered is because
if we put a task which doesn't allow all CPUs into a layer's DSQ, it may not
get consumed for an indefinite amount of time. However, this is only true
for confined layers. Both open and grouped layers always consumed from all
CPUs and thus don't have this risk.
Let's allow tasks with custom affinities in open and grouped layers.
- In select_cpu(), don't consider direct dispatching to a local DSQ as
affinity violation even if the target CPU is outside the layer's cpumask
if the layer is open.
- In enqueue(), separate out per-cpu kthread special case into its own
block. Note that this is only applied if the layer is not preempting as a
preempting layer has a higher priority than HI_FALLBACK_DSQ anyway.
- Trigger the LO_FALLBACK_DSQ path for other threads only if the layer is
confined.
- The preemption path now also runs for tasks with a custom affinity in open
and grouped layers. Update it so that it only considers the CPUs in the
preempting task's allowed cpumask.
(cherry picked from commit 82d2f887a4608de61ddf5e15643c10e504a88f7b)
- AFFN_VIOL for per-cpu tasks could be double counted. Once in select_cpu()
and again in enqueue(). Count in select_cpu() only when direct
dispatching.
- Violating tasks were prioritized over non-violating ones because they were
queued on SCX_DSQ_GLOBAL which has priority over all user DSQs. This
doesn't make sense. Let's introduce two fallback DSQs - HI_FALLBACK_DSQ
and LO_FALLBACK_DSQ. HI is used for violating kthreads and LO for
violating user threads. HI is dispatched after preempting layers and LO
after all other layers. This shouldn't change the behavior too much for
kthreads while punshing, rather than rewarding, violating user threads.
(cherry picked from commit 67f69645667ba8a155cae9a9b7e90c055d39e23c)
Dispatch non-interactive tasks on the CPU selected by the built-in idle
selection logic and allow interactive tasks to be dispatched on any CPU.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Do not always assign the maximum time slice to interactive tasks, but
use the same value of the dynamic time slice for everyone.
This seems to prevent potential audio cracking when the system is over
commissioned.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
The option --full-user is provided to delegate *all* scheduling
decisions to the user-space scheduler with no exception, including the
idle selection logic.
Therefore, make this option incompatible with --builtin-idle and
completely bypass the built-in idle selection logic when running in
full-user mode.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Provide a knob in scx_rustland_core to automatically turn the scheduler
into a simple FIFO when the system is underutilized.
This choice is based on the assumption that, in the case of system
underutilization (less tasks running than the amount of available CPUs),
the best scheduling policy is FIFO.
With this option enabled the scheduler starts in FIFO mode. If most of
the CPUs are busy (nr_running >= num_cpus - 1), the scheduler
immediately exits from FIFO mode and starts to apply the logic
implemented by the user-space component. Then the scheduler can switch
back to FIFO if there are no tasks waiting to be scheduled (evaluated
using a moving average).
This option can be enabled/disabled by the user-space scheduler using
the fifo_sched parameter in BpfScheduler: if set, the BPF component will
periodically check for system utilization and switch back and forth to
FIFO mode based on that.
This allows to improve performance of workloads that are using a small
amount of the available CPUs in the system, while still maintaining the
same good level of performance for interactive tasks when the system is
over commissioned.
In certain video games, such as Baldur's Gate 3 or Counter-Strike 2,
running in "normal" system conditions, we can experience a boost in fps
of approximately 4-8% with this change applied.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
This merge included additional commits that were supposed to be included
in a separate pull request and have nothing to do with the fifo-mode
changes.
Therefore, revert the whole pull request and create a separate one with
the correct list of commits required to implement this feature.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Dispatch non-interactive tasks on the CPU selected by the built-in idle
selection logic and allow interactive tasks to be dispatched on any CPU.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Do not always assign the maximum time slice to interactive tasks, but
use the same value of the dynamic time slice for everyone.
This seems to prevent potential audio cracking when the system is over
commissioned.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Provide a knob in scx_rustland_core to automatically turn the scheduler
into a simple FIFO when the system is underutilized.
This choice is based on the assumption that, in the case of system
underutilization (less tasks running than the amount of available CPUs),
the best scheduling policy is FIFO.
With this option enabled the scheduler starts in FIFO mode. If most of
the CPUs are busy (nr_running >= num_cpus - 1), the scheduler
immediately exits from FIFO mode and starts to apply the logic
implemented by the user-space component. Then the scheduler can switch
back to FIFO if there are no tasks waiting to be scheduled (evaluated
using a moving average).
This option can be enabled/disabled by the user-space scheduler using
the fifo_sched parameter in BpfScheduler: if set, the BPF component will
periodically check for system utilization and switch back and forth to
FIFO mode based on that.
This allows to improve performance of workloads that are using a small
amount of the available CPUs in the system, while still maintaining the
same good level of performance for interactive tasks when the system is
over commissioned.
In certain video games, such as Baldur's Gate 3 or Counter-Strike 2,
running in "normal" system conditions, we can experience a boost in fps
of approximately 4-8% with this change applied.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Report the amount of running tasks to stdout. This value also represents
the amount of active CPUs that are currently executing a task.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
The dynamic slice boost is not used anymore in the code, so there is no
reason to keep evaluating it.
Moreover, using it instead of the static slice boost seems to make
things worse, so let's just get rid of it.
Fixes: 0b3c399 ("scx_rustland: introduce dynamic slice boost")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
When building with warnings enabled, a few obvious bugs are pointed out:
- We're not correctly calculating waker frequency
- We're not taking the min of avg_run_raw compared to max latency
- We're missing an element from sched_prio_to_weight
Fix these. With these changes, interactivity is seemingly improved. We
go from ~12 sec / turn -> 11 seconds / turn in the Civ 6 AI benchmark
with a 4 x nproc CPU hogging workload in the background. It's clear,
however, that we really need preemption.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
C SCX_OPS_ATTACH() and rust scx_ops_attach() macros were not calling
.attach() and were only attaching the struct_ops. This meant that all
non-struct_ops BPF programs contained in the skels were never attached which
breaks e.g. scx_layered.
Let's fix it by adding .attach() invocation the the attach macros.
Originally the implementation of function rsigmoid_u64 will
perform substraction even when the value of "v" equals to the value
of "max" , in which the result is certainly zero.
We can avoid this redundant substration by changing the condition from
">" to ">=" since we know when the value of "v" and "max" are equal
we can return 0 without any substract operation.
Now that the scx_ops_open!() macro is available, let's use it in scx_rusty to
cover all cases of when hotplug can happen.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Now that the kernel exports the SCX_ECODE_ACT_RESTART exit code, we can
remove the custom hotplug logic from scx_rusty, and instead rely on the
built-in logic from the kernel. There's still a corner case that we're not
honoring: when a hotplug event happens on the init path. A future change will
address this as well.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Introduce a low-power mode to force the scheduler to operate in a very
non-work conserving way, causing a significant saving in terms of power
consumption, while still providing a good level of responsiveness in the
system.
This option can be enabled in scx_rustland via the --low_power / -l
option.
The idea is to not immediately re-kick a CPU when it enters an idle
state, but do that only if there are no other tasks running in the
system.
In this way, latency-critical tasks can be still dispatched immediately
on the other active CPUs, while CPU-bound tasks will be forced to spend
more time waiting to be scheduled, basically enforcing a special CPU
throttling mechanism that affects only the tasks that are not latency
critical.
The consequence is a reduction in the overall system throughput, but
also a significant reduction of power consumption, that can be useful
for mobile / battery-powered devices.
Test case (using `scx_rustland -l`):
- play a video game (Terraria) while recompiling the kernel
- measure game performance (fps) and core power consumption (W)
- compare the result of normal mode vs low-power mode
Result:
Game performance | Power consumption |
------------+-----------------+-------------------+
normal mode | 60 fps | 6W |
low-power mode | 60 fps | 3W |
As we can see from the result the reduction of power consumption is
quite significant (50%), while the responsiveness of the game (fps)
remains the same, that means battery life can be potentially doubled
without significantly affecting system responsiveness.
The overall throughput of the system is, of course, affected in a
negative way (kernel build is approximately 50% slower during this
test), but the goal here is to save power while still maintaining a good
level of responsiveness in the system.
For this reason the low-power mode should be considered only in
emergency conditions, for example when the system is close to completely
run out of power or simply to extend the battery life of a mobile device
without compromising its responsiveness.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
During the initialization phase the scheduler needs to be aware of all
the available CPUs in the system (also those that are offline), in order
to create a proper per-CPU DSQ for all of them.
Otherwise, if some cores are offline, we may get errors like the
following:
swapper/7[0] triggered exit kind 1024:
runtime error (invalid DSQ ID 0x0000000000000007)
Backtrace:
scx_bpf_consume+0xaa/0xd0
bpf_prog_42ff1b9d1ac5b184_rustland_dispatch+0x12b/0x187
Change the code to configure the BpfScheduler object with the total
amount of CPUs available in the system and prevent such failure.
This fixes#280.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Always dispatch at least one task, even if all the CPUs are busy.
This small overcommitment allows to maximize the CPU utilization without
introducing bubbles in the scheduling and also without introducing
regressions in terms of resposiveness.
Before this change the average CPU utilization of a `stress-ng -c 8` on
an 8-cores system is around 95%. With this change applied the CPU
utilization goes up to a consistent 100%.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Add a method to TopologyMap to get the amount of online CPUs.
Considering that most of the schedulers are not handling CPU hotplugging
it can be useful to expose also this metric in addition to the amount of
available CPUs in the system.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Drop the global effective time-slice and use the more fine-grained
per-task time-slice to implement the dynamic time-slice capability.
This allows to reduce the scheduler's overhead (dropping the global time
slice volatile variable shared between user-space and BPF) and it
provides a more fine-grained control on the per-task time slice.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
If there is a higher priority task when running ops.tick(),
ops.select_cpu(), and ops.enqueue() callbacks, the current running tasks
yields its CPU by shrinking time slice to zero and a higher priority
task can run on the current CPU.
As low-cost, fine-grained preemption becomes available, default
parameters are adjusted as follows:
- Raise the bar for remote CPU preemption to avoid IPIs.
- Increase the maximum time slice.
- Gradually enforce the fair use of CPU time (i.e., ineligible duration)
Lastly, using CAS, we ensure that a remote CPU is preempted by only one
CPU. This removes unnecessary remote preemptions (and IPIs).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Replace the BPF_MAP_TYPE_QUEUE with a BPF_MAP_TYPE_USER_RINGBUF to store
the tasks dispatched from the user-space scheduler to the BPF component.
This eliminates the need of the bpf() syscalls, significantly reducing
the overhead of the user-space->kernel communication and delivering a
notable performance boost in the overall system throughput.
Based on experimental results, this change allows to reduces the scheduling
overhead by approximately 30-35% when the system is overcommitted.
This improvement has the potential to make user-space schedulers based
on scx_rustland_core viable options for real production systems.
Link: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-rs/pull/776
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
scx_rusty's intention is to support hotplug by automatically restarting
whenever a hotplug event is encountered. Now that we're not trying to
consume a bogus DSQ in the rusty_dispatch() on a newly hotplugged CPU,
let's just remove offline tracking. It's really just there as a sanity
check, but it triggers if an offline task is made runnable during a
hotplug event before the ops.hotplug() callback has been invoked.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
There's currently a slight issue on existing kernels on the hotplug
path wherein we can start to receive scheduling callbacks on a CPU
before that CPU has received hotplug events. For CPUs going online, this
can possibly confuse a scheduler because it may not be expecting
anything to ever happen on that CPU, and therefore may do things that
could cause the scheduler to crash. For example, without this patch in
scx_rusty, we try to consume from a bogus DSQ that doesn't exist, which
causes ext.c to boot out the scheduler.
Though this issue will soon be fixed in ext.c, let's explicitly avoid
dispatching from an onlining CPU in rusty so that we properly support
hotplug on older kernels as well.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
scx_lavd implemented 32 and 64 bit versions of a base-2 logarithm
function. This is now also used in rusty. To avoid code duplication,
let's pull it into a shared header.
Note that there is technically a functional change here as we remove the
always inline compiler directive. We instead assume that the compiler
will know best whether or not to inline the function.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
In user space in rusty, the tuner detects system utilization, and uses
it to inform how we do load balancing, our greedy / direct cpumasks,
etc. Something else we could be doing but currently aren't, is using
system utilization to inform how we dispatch tasks. We currently have a
static, unchanging slice length for the runtime of the program, but this
is inefficient for all scenarios.
Giving a task a long slice length does have advantages, such as
decreasing the number of involuntary context switches, decreasing the
overhead of preemption by doing it less frequently, possibly getting
better cache locality due to a task running on a CPU for a longer amount
of time, etc. On the other hand, long slices can be problematic as well.
When a system is highly utilized, a CPU-hogging task running for too
long can harm interactive tasks. When the system is under-utilized,
those interactive tasks can likely find an idle, or under-utilized core
to run on. When the system is over-utilized, however, they're likely to
have to park in a runqueue.
Thus, in order to better accommodate such scenarios, this patch
implements a rudimentary slice scaling mechanism in scx_rusty. Rather
than having one global, static slice length, we instead have a dynamic,
global slice length that can be changed depending on system utilization.
When over-utilized, we go with a longer slice length, and vice versa for
when the system is under-utilized. With Terraria, this results in
roughly a 50% improvement in mean FPS when playing on an AMD Ryzen 9
7950X, while running Spotify, and stress-ng -c $((4 * $(nproc))).
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
scx_rusty doesn't do terribly well with interactive workloads. In order
to improve the situation, this patch adds support for basic deadline
scheduling in rusty. This approach doesn't incorporate eligibility, and
simply uses a crude avg_runtime tracking approach to scaling a task's
deadline.
In a series of follow-on changes, we'll update the scheduler to use more
indicators for interactivity that affect both slice length, and deadline
calculation.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To know the required CPU performance (e.g., frequency) demand, we keep
track of 1) utilization of each CPU and 2) _performance criticality_ of
each task. The performance criticality of a task denotes how critical it
is to CPU performance (frequency). Like the notion of latency
criticality, we use three factors: the task's average runtime, wake-up
frequency, and waken-up frequency. A task's runtime is longer, and its
two frequencies are higher; the task is more performance-critical
because it would be a bottleneck in the middle of the task chain.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Let's remove the extraneous copy pasting and use a lookup helper like we
do for task and pcpu context.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
A LoadEntity gets the load to transfer between two entities by taking
the minimum of their imbalances and reducing its abs value by
xfer_ratio.
In practice self.imbal(), the push node or domain, always has positive
imbalance and other.imbal(), the pull node or domain, always has
negative imbalance, so other.imbal() is always the minimum even though
the abs value of its imbalance might be greater than the abs value of
self.imbal(). It seems like the intent is to take the minimum of the
two absolute values instead to avoid overbalancing at the puller, so
make both values abs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Rusty's load balancer calculates load differently based on average
system CPU utilization in create_domain_hierarchy(). At >= 99.999%
utilization, load is the product of a task's weight and duty cycle;
below that, load is the same as the task's duty cycle.
populate_tasks_by_load(), however, always uses the product when
calculating per-task load so that in the sub-99.999% util case, load is
inflated, typically by a factor of 100 with a normal priority task.
Tasks look too heavy to migrate as a result because a single task would
transfer more load than the domain imbalance allows, leading to
significant imbalance in some cases.
Make populate_tasks_by_load() calculate task load the same way as
domain load, checking lb_apply_weight.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
The current code replenishes the task's time slice whenever the task
becomes ops.running(). However, there is a case where such behavior can
starve the other tasks, causing the watchdog timeout error. One (if not
all) such case is when a task is preempted while running by the higher
scheduler class (e.g., RT, DL). In such a case, the task will be transit
in a cycle of ops.running() -> ops.stopping() -> ops.running() -> etc.
Whenever it becomes re-running, it will be placed at the head of local
DSQ and ops.running() will renew its time slice. Hence, in the worst
case, the task can run forever since its time slice is never exhausted.
The fix is assigning the time slice only once by checking if the time
slice is calculated before.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Provide a command line option to print the version of the scheduler and
the scx_rustland_core crate.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Given that rustland_core now supports task preemption and it has been
tested successfully, it's worhtwhile to cut a new version of the crate.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
In Rust c_char can be aliased to i8 or u8, depending on the particular
target architecture.
For example, trying to build scx_lavd on ppc64 triggers the following
error:
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:200:38
|
200 | let c_tx_cm: *const c_char = (&tx.comm as *const [i8; 17]) as *const i8;
| ------------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `*const u8`, found `*const i8`
| |
| expected due to this
|
= note: expected raw pointer `*const u8`
found raw pointer `*const i8`
To fix this, consistently use c_char instead of assuming it corresponds
to i8.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
In _some_ kernel versions, loading scx_lavd fails with an error of
"bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing". The usage of
bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in proc_dump_all_tasks() is correct but the
bpf verifier still think bpf_rcu_read_unlock() is missing. The most
plausible reason so far is that the problematic kernel does not have a
commit 6fceea0fa59f ("bpf: Transfer RCU lock state between subprog
calls"), failing inter-procedural analysis between proc_dump_all_tasks()
and submit_task_ctx(). Thus, we force inline submit_task_ctx() (no
inter-procedural analysis by the verifier is necessary) for the time
being.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Only the very newest kernels support scx_bpf_cpuperf_set(). Let's update
scx_layered to accommodate older kernels as well.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Looking at perf top it seems that the scheduler can spend a significant
amount of time iterating over the CPU topology/cpumask information,
especially when the system is running a significant amount of tasks:
2.57% scx_rustland [.] <scx_utils::cpumask::CpumaskIntoIterator as core::iter::traits::iterator::Iterator>::next
Considering that scx_rustland doesn't support CPU hotplugging yet (it
requires a full restart to properly handle CPU hotplug events), we can
completely avoid this overhead by caching a TopologyMap object at the
beginning, when the scheduler starts, instead of constantly
re-evaluating the CPU topology information.
This allows to reduce the scheduler overhead by ~5% CPU utilization
under heavy load conditions (from ~65% -> ~60%, according to top).
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
This change adds `scx_bpf_cpuperf_cap`, `scx_bpf_cpuperf_cur` and
`scx_bpf_cpuperf_set` definitions that were recently introduced into
[`sched_ext`](https://github.com/sched-ext/sched_ext/pull/180). It adds
a `perf` field to `scx_layered` to allow for controlling performance per
layer.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com>
If a library creates threads, those threads will often have the same
name. If two different processes of different priority both use a
library, it may be that we want the library's threads in each process to
be put into different layers.
To support this, let's add the ability to filter not only by task name,
but also by process name via the task thread group leader's comm.
Tested by creating two executables named "foo" and "bar", which both
spawn a bunch of tasks named "exp_worker" that spin until being
interrupted. With this config: https://pastebin.com/Uz2phzxQ, the tasks
were correctly matched to the expected layers.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
We're currently cloning cpumasks returned by calls to {Core, Cache,
Node, Topology}::span(). If a caller needs to clone it, they can. Let's
not penalize the callers that just want to query the underlying cpumask.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Some people have expressed confusion at this behavior. Let's be a bit
more explicit in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Provide a run-time option to disable task preemption.
This option can be used to improve the throughput of the CPU-intensive
tasks while still providing a good level of responsiveness in the
system.
By default preemption is enabled, to provide a higher level of
responsiveness to the interactive tasks.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Use the new scx_rustland_core dispatch flag RL_PREEMPT_CPU to allow
interactive tasks to preempt other tasks with scx_rustland.
If the built-in idle selection logic is enforced (option `-i`), the
scheduler prioritizes keeping tasks on the target CPU designated by this
logic. With preemption enabled, these tasks have a higher likelihood of
reusing their cached working set, potentially improving performance.
Alternatively, when tasks are dispatched to the first available CPU
(default behavior), interactive tasks benefit from running more promptly
by kicking out other tasks before their assigned time slice expires.
This potentially allows to increase the default time slice to higher
values in the future, to improve the overall throughput in the system
and, at the same time, still maintain a good level of responsiveness,
because interactive tasks are now able to run pretty much immediately,
independently on the remaining time slice of the other tasks that are
contending the CPUs in the system.
= Results =
Measuring the performance of the usual benchmark "playing a video game
while running a parallel kernel build in background" seems to give
around 2-10% boost in the fps with preemption enabled, depending on the
particular video game.
Results were obtained running a `make -j32` kernel build on a AMD Ryzen
7 5800X 8-Cores 16GB RAM, while testing video games such as Baldur's
Gate 3 (with a solid +10% fps), Counter Strike 2 (around +5%) and Team
Fortress 2 (+2% boost).
Moreover, some WebGL applications (such as
https://webglsamples.org/aquarium/aquarium.html) seem to benefit even
more with preemption enabled, providing up to a +15% fps boost.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Reserve some bits of the `cpu` attribute of a task to store special
dispatch flags.
Initially, let's introduce just RL_CPU_ANY to replace the special value
NO_CPU, indicating that the task can be dispatched on any CPU,
specifically the first CPU that becomes available.
This allows to keep the CPU value assigned by the builtin idle selection
logic, that can potentially be used later for further optimizations.
Moreover, having the possibility to specify dispatch flags gives more
flexibility and it allows to map new scheduling features to such flags.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
