We have a specific issue that a user uploaded a file to a bucket
geo-fenced to EU and one of the pieces appeared to be on a node in the
US. The country code of this node is set to SE (Sweden) in the satellite
DB. It turns out that some time ago MaxMind changed the country code of
this node's IP from Sweden to US, but this change hasn't been reflected
in the satellite's database.
So far the satellite updates the country code of a node only if its IP
changes. It was assumed that if the IP does not change, its country code
shouldn't change too. This turned to be a wrong assumption.
With this change, the satellite will look up the MaxMindDB on every
check-in to see if the country code of the node's IP has changed.
Change-Id: Icdf659b09be9fc6ad14601902032b35ba5ea78c4
This test involves a satellite with dev defaults (DistinctIP=no) being
upgraded past commit 2522ff09b6, which
means we need to run the dev-defaults-satellite-upgrade migration SQL
to avoid getting DistinctIP=yes behavior (which breaks the tests).
Change-Id: I29fb596d1ffa568dad635d98cfe9abacd3aaa48f
It was surprising that `satellite auditor` complained about SMTP mail settings, even if it's not supposed to sending any mail.
Looks like we can remove the mail service dependency, as it's not a hard requirement for overlay.Service.
Change-Id: I29a52eeff3f967ddb2d74a09458dc0ee2f051bd7
Up to now, we have been implementing the DistinctIP preference with code
in two places:
1. On check-in, the last_net is determined by taking the /24 or /64
(in ResolveIPAndNetwork()) and we store it with the node record.
2. On node selection, a preference parameter defines whether to return
results that are distinct on last_net.
It can be observed that we have never yet had the need to switch from
DistinctIP to !DistinctIP, or from !DistinctIP to DistinctIP, on the
same satellite, and we will probably never need to do so in an automated
way. It can also be observed that this arrangement makes tests more
complicated, because we often have to arrange for test nodes to have IP
addresses in different /24 networks (a particular pain on macOS).
Those two considerations, plus some pending work on the repair framework
that will make repair take last_net into consideration, motivate this
change.
With this change, in the #2 place, we will _always_ return results that
are distinct on last_net. We implement the DistinctIP preference, then,
by making the #1 place (ResolveIPAndNetwork()) more flexible. When
DistinctIP is enabled, last_net will be calculated as it was before. But
when DistinctIP is _off_, last_net can be the same as address (IP and
port). That will effectively implement !DistinctIP because every
record will have a distinct last_net already.
As a side effect, this flexibility will allow us to change the rules
about last_net construction arbitrarily. We can do tests where last_net
is set to the source IP, or to a /30 prefix, or a /16 prefix, etc., and
be able to exercise the production logic without requiring a virtual
network bridge.
This change should be safe to make without any migration code, because
all known production satellite deployments use DistinctIP, and the
associated last_net values will not change for them. They will only
change for satellites with !DistinctIP, which are mostly test
deployments that can be recreated trivially. For those satellites which
are both permanent and !DistinctIP, node selection will suddenly start
acting as though DistinctIP is enabled, until the operator runs a single
SQL update "UPDATE nodes SET last_net = last_ip_port". That can be done
either before or after deploying software with this change.
I also assert that this will not hurt performance for production
deployments. It's true that adding the distinct requirement to node
selection makes things a little slower, but the distinct requirement is
already present for all production deployments, and they will see no
change.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5391
Change-Id: I0e7e92498c3da768df5b4d5fb213dcd2d4862924
this change uses the new storj/common noise helpers, which:
* add a security fix (require an expected node id for validating
noise key attestations)
* stops doing an unnecessary order signature validation (it's
already been done inside of PutPiece)
* removes some duplicate code
Change-Id: I5e67a08ff216cd9c5b0b82e40b4d9de664b6b0fc
We will be needing an infrequent chore to check which nodes are in the
reverify queue and synchronize that set with the 'contained' field in
the nodes db, since it is easily possible for them to get out of sync.
(We can't require that the reverification queue table be in the same
database as the nodes table, so maintaining consistency with SQL
transactions is out. Plus, even if they were in the same database, using
such SQL transactions to maintain consistency would be slow and
unwieldy.)
This commit adds a method to the overlay allowing the caller to set the
contained status of all nodes in the nodes table at once. This is valid
because our definition of "contained" now depends solely on whether a
node appears at least once in the reverification queue. Only rows whose
contained field does not match the expectation will be updated; the
contained timestamp will not be updated for a node which is supposed to
be contained and was already contained.
Change-Id: I8cabe56ad897b6027e11aa5b17175295391aa3ac
we have two more fields in the database (noise_proto and
noise_public_key) that now need to go into pb.NodeAddress when
returning AddressedOrderLimits.
the only real complication is making sure type conversions between
database types and NodeURLs and so on don't lose this new
pb.NodeAddress field (NoiseInfo). otherwise this is a relatively
straightforward commit
Change-Id: I45b59d7b2d3ae21c2e6eb95497f07cd388d454b3
The CASE expression used to determine which value to set
last_software_update_email to did not have an ELSE clause. Therefore,
when the node is both below the minimum version and did not receive a
version update email (no condition is true), the value would be set to
NULL.
Additionally, replace `time.Now()` with `timestamp` in the check to
determine if the email cooldown has passed.
Change-Id: I2e2e93f1a865e123ed8b665be9621cebfb72236f
`overlay.(*Service).UpdateReputation()` takes a "reputationChanges"
parameter, a slice of node events indicating whether we think the node's
disqualification or suspension status is changing. This is necessary so
that the overlay service can notify the nodeevents DB about these
changes.
In several cases, however, this list of events is not constructed
correctly, because of missing information about the previous state.
In most cases, this is because the node was offline, and the order limit
creation functions (which usually obtain and return the prior reputation
status) ignored that node.
This change makes it so that all callers to
`overlay.(*Service).UpdateReputation()` can be expected to provide a
correct list of change events (as correct as feasible, given that we
can't lock the node's information in the database during the entire
operation).
It ended up that there was only one caller we needed to worry about, and
that was reputation.(*Service).ApplyAudit(). So the bulk of this change
is teaching that function how to recognize when the prior reputation
status was not filled in, and fill it in.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5464
Change-Id: I52ce385fc9c0ce3b283b998d517998e7f4ec8792
SetNodeContained() will change the contained flag in the nodes table,
which will affect whether nodes are selected for new uploads. This flag
_should_ correlate with whether or not a given node has any entries in
the reverification queue. However, the reverification queue is intended
to be 'safely partitionable' from the nodes table, so we can't enforce
that characteristic transactionally. But this is ok; there are no dire
consequences if they are out of sync.
We will be adding a chore that updates the contained flag based on the
contents of the reverification queue periodically, if something fails
to set it directly when appropriate.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5231
Change-Id: I26460d8718dee63fd55d00a44568b2065fc8fe30
Add a new chore to periodically insert nodes who are offline and
have not gotten an offline email in a certain amount of time into node
events
Change-Id: I658b385bb777b0240c98092946a93d65bee94abc
Add LastOfflineEmail to overlay.NodeDossier. This is the last time a
node got an offline email. Add two new overlay db methods,
GetOfflineNodesForEmail and UpdateLastOfflineEmail. Edit db method
UpdateCheckIn to nullify last_offline_email if node is up.
Change-Id: I1ee60e7d98dd1b68348a57f9a4fb77c6c9895d6d
When a node checks in and its version is below the minimum, insert
BelowMinVersion event into node events
Change-Id: I0e437ac34496778369515cbc40c15676da8b27ae
Instead of sending emails at the time the node is seen to be back
online, we have decided to send the event to the node events table,
which will initiate the email sending process at some point.
Change-Id: Id756209498112579de8e78ee20ad2df54571a617
Add nodeevents.DB to satellite overlay service so we can insert node
events into the nodeevents DB.
Change-Id: I642c0ccc9941ecdb08cb22d5c8cf701959a55156
We want to send emails to SNOs. Node status changes go through the
overlay service, so it's a good place to add the mail service.
Add the mailservice.Service, satellite address, and satellite name to
overlay service. Also add feature flag --overlay.send-node-emails
Change-Id: I3bd2cb3bf22f9724954ce2374f8b651b902b3a24
Pieces count in DB are stored as int64 and we would like to align bloom
filter processing with this type.
Change-Id: Iaec767e609a40d802077ae057520541805a7c44f
Currently, the satellite tracks connectivity information about all nodes
that have contacted it, even if we have never successfully contacted
the node back.
This behavior was leveraged during a security audit to create hundreds
of thousands of "junk nodes" in the nodes table on one satellite, which
affected performance of queries such as node selection.
With this change, we should no longer track information about nodes that
have never been successfully contacted.
Note that it will still be possible to cause the creation of "junk
node" entries in the db; the attacker just has to set up individual
publicly-routable IP+port pairs for each node as it is created, so it
can respond to a PingBack.
Change-Id: Ibb6da6cc908fd4fc85aae1ba00313ba2738409ab
This is in response to community feedback that our existing reputation
calculation is too likely to disqualify storage nodes unfairly with
extreme swings up and down.
For details and analysis, please see the data_loss_vs_dq_chance_sim.py
tool, the "tuning reputation further.ipynb" Jupyter notebook in the
storj/datascience repository, and the discussion at
https://forum.storj.io/t/tuning-audit-scoring/14084
In brief: changing the lambda and initial-alpha parameters in this way
causes the swings in reputation to be smaller and less likely to put a
node past the disqualification threshold unfairly.
Note: this change will cause a one-time reset of all (non-disqualified)
node reputations, because the new initial alpha value of 1000 is
dramatically different, and the disqualification threshold is going to
be much higher.
Change-Id: Id6dc4ba8fde1be3db4255b72282207bab5491ca3
Use DownloadSelectionCache to avoid querying database for every
download.
This change only addresses downloads from users. The download selection
cache is not currently used for audit and repair.
Change-Id: I96a49e121dac0b4204f97592a63131edabd73fb5
This test had an effective config.Reputation.AuditCount = 0, meaning all
nodes that had _any_ positive audit results were considered vetted.
Because of that, only one node in the test setup was "new". And that
node was marked as being in GE, so could not be returned by node
selection.
The reason the tests still worked is because of the node selection rule
that says "if there are no new nodes at all, just get all reputable
nodes to satisfy the request".
This commit makes it so half of the nodes are vetted and half new, which
makes the test somewhat more interesting (and means we aren't
concentrating too much on testing details of behavior when AuditCount is
0).
Change-Id: I09157b7dc20ecaddd2a6e60cfe146e9186e3603b
prevent network enumeration by rejecting privateIPs in PingMe and
Checkin endpoints
Closesstorj/storj-private#32
Change-Id: I63f00483ff4128ebd5fa9b7b8da826a5706748c9
Set disqualification reason when reputations stats are updated on DB.Update.
Added tests for DisqualifyNode and for disqualification cases which happens during Update.
Change-Id: I00130ab5d9722422805159ad2f183c205de60f7e
For nodes in excluded areas, we don't necessarily want to remove them
from the pointer, but we do want to increase the number of pieces in the
segment in case those excluded area nodes go down. To do that, we
increase the number of pieces repaired by the number of pieces in
excluded areas.
Change-Id: I0424f1bcd7e93f33eb3eeeec79dbada3b3ea1f3a
Create global config to specify a list of country codes that should be
excluded from node selection during uploads.
This exclusion is not implemented when the upload selection cache is
disabled.
Change-Id: Ic41e8b4f18857a11045668eac23107da99668a72
Add a RepairExcludedCountryCodes config flag for overlay for providing a list of country codes to exclude nodes from target repair selection.
Mark segments with less than repairThreshold pieces in countries not in the RepairExcludedCountryCodes as not healthy.
With this change, the repair process is not affected. The segment will be removed from the repair queue by the repairer.
Another change will handle the logic at the repairer level.
Fixes https://github.com/storj/team-metainfo/issues/95
Change-Id: I9231b32de117a116488de055a3e94efcabb46e81
The database table got invalid input and the resulting error
was not checked. This adds updates that contain invalid fields
to trigger different errors.
Change-Id: Iacea32cbef5599aab562c88e4113073596cc9996
inconsistency
The original design had a flaw which can potentially cause discrepancy
for nodes reputation status between reputations table and nodes table.
In the event of a failure(network issue, db failure, satellite failure, etc.)
happens between update to reputations table and update to nodes table, data
can be out of sync.
This PR tries to fix above issue by passing through node's reputation from
the beginning of an audit/repair(this data is from nodes table) to the next
update in reputation service. If the updated reputation status from the service
is different from the existing node status, the service will try to update nodes
table. In the case of a failure, the service will be able to try update nodes
table again since it can see the discrepancy of the data. This will allow
both tables to be in-sync eventually.
Change-Id: Ic22130b4503a594b7177237b18f7e68305c2f122
Currently the test threshold for unneeded node checkins are 30s.
The disqualification threshold was at 30s, which means, it was possible
for all the nodes to get disqualified.
Hopefully fixes#4267
Change-Id: I6b0a10c09b7fd90a9729794885c9e7a593781bad
