The blobstore implementation is entirely related to storagenode, so the
rightful place is together with the storagenode implementation.
Fixes https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5754
Change-Id: Ie6637b0262cf37af6c3e558556c7604d9dc3613d
storj/storj uses storj/uplink and storj/uplink uses storj/storj (for integration test).
Without using the real defaults (instead of hard coded ones) in storj/storj, we couldn't modify them. (modification in uplink will fail when storj/storj is used for integration test, with the unchanged, hard-coded defaults).
Change-Id: Ifa68567dc2d5c8d08af8041ac338870c4fc26d45
add ability to sort api keys on the access management page by ascending
or descending name or creation date. Additionally, edit api keys query
when ordering by name to order by lower(name) so names starting with
capital letters are not treated differently from lower case when
ordering.
Change-Id: I81dbb87587a24fb7097313f76bad116b1f20d306
With this change we are replacing parsing code with existing go-redis
util.
We also switch redis client to version 9.
Change-Id: Ie4a651e3ae6960e68958c690873925d319b70e10
We use defineComponent syntax because images are not loaded with regular <script setup> syntax and dynamic template source.
Change-Id: If0993c57772277e767db2b0705100215e17a4625
The following tests should be made less flaky by this change:
- TestFailedDataRepair
- TestOfflineNodeDataRepair
- TestUnknownErrorDataRepair
- TestMissingPieceDataRepair_Succeed
- TestMissingPieceDataRepair
- TestCorruptDataRepair_Succeed
- TestCorruptDataRepair_Failed
This follows on to a change in commit 6bb64796. Nearly all tests in the
repair suite used to rely on events happening in a certain order. After
some of our performance work, those things no longer happen in that
expected order every time. This caused much flakiness.
The fix in 6bb64796 was sufficient for the tests operating directly on
an `*ECRepairer` instance, but not for the tests that make use of the
repairer by way of the repair queue and the repair worker. These tests
needed a different way to indicate the number of expected failures. This
change provides that different way.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5736
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5718
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5715
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5609
Change-Id: Iddcf5be3a3ace7ad35fddb513ab53dd3f2f0eb0e
Components related to project usage costs have been updated to show
different estimations for each partner, and the satellite has been
updated to send the client the information it needs to do this.
Previously, project costs in the satellite frontend were estimated
using only the price model corresponding to the partner that the user
registered with. This caused users who had a project containing
differently-attributed buckets to see an incorrect price estimation.
Resolvesstorj/storj-private#186
Change-Id: I2531643bc49f24fcb2e5f87e528b552285b6ff20
This is not recommended for most nodes; leaving your node running when
it can't handle requests fast enough is a good way to fail audits and
get disqualified, which may happen before you even know about the
problem.
But some Windows users are finding that this is being triggered
regularly on their nodes, and that it apparently causes the whole system
to lock up occasionally. We are adding this option as a way to mitigate
that problem until we can collect more information.
Change-Id: I7a652b0f9f970bbb9ed9f2cb3ad1cb89d90db8d7
