We want to be able to limit the number of segments per project for users.
To limit this we need to check limit value associated with project
and value of used segments already in BeginMoveObject, BeginMoveSegment
and increment cache segments usage after each CommitSegment call.
Resolves https://github.com/storj/team-metainfo/issues/1
Change-Id: I6290e67c095a174b9d101c4521802d9bfe0453b8
Currently the admin UI Makefile target deletes the .gitignore file.
While it being unnecessary to my findings it also causes and dirty
git repository, since files have been modified.
Removing this command lets the build process continue to work as expected
and since we are not commiting any files or assets later on this should
be fine.
Change-Id: Ibc1b7a8e456394ca19ea39dd8389c2ec03f066fc
inconsistency
The original design had a flaw which can potentially cause discrepancy
for nodes reputation status between reputations table and nodes table.
In the event of a failure(network issue, db failure, satellite failure, etc.)
happens between update to reputations table and update to nodes table, data
can be out of sync.
This PR tries to fix above issue by passing through node's reputation from
the beginning of an audit/repair(this data is from nodes table) to the next
update in reputation service. If the updated reputation status from the service
is different from the existing node status, the service will try to update nodes
table. In the case of a failure, the service will be able to try update nodes
table again since it can see the discrepancy of the data. This will allow
both tables to be in-sync eventually.
Change-Id: Ic22130b4503a594b7177237b18f7e68305c2f122
Batching of the order submissions can lead to combining the allocated
traffic totals for two completely different time windows, resulting
in incorrect customer accounting. This change will group the batched
order submissions by projectID as well as time window, leading to
distinct updates of a buckets bandwidth rollup based on the hour
window in which the order was created.
Change-Id: Ifb4d67923eec8a533b9758379914f17ff7abea32
Each test doesn't need to be in a separate file.
Keep naming consistent such that relevant tests can be run together.
Also skip test that do not work at the moment.
No functional changes.
Change-Id: Icd314d383ec5b683dea8afaaf2790e2e4b306671
We want to issue a reminder to users when they don't verify their email within 24hrs of registering. This change only adds a column to the users table.
Change-Id: I92e2baeabf179338ffec01574d4752c0ccdba88b
This allows us to distinguish between accounts created from the signup
page vs. from www.storj.io.
Also set a field `account_created=true` when we send so
that we can see when existing leads have created an account.
Change-Id: Ibef34825a08b6c68b8f2869625e576bb837520e5
Currently UI tests are always failing.
Disable them for now, since they do not add any useful signal to the result.
Change-Id: Ifa4a5c70cb6954e355fa9f26912fb0ce03a62ddc
This change includes storagenode QUIC status on SNO dashboard.
If disabled, it displays warning for SNOs to foward their
UDP port for quic.
Change-Id: I8d28c9c0f5f1e90d80b7c18b9e1e7b78c5e45609
this makes the flags match rclone nomenclature
fixes test-uplinkng to use the temporary config dir
instead of the machine default, and clean up some.
bumps clingy so that the command errors when an unknown
command is specified.
also fixes some printfs in share to use clingy stdout.
it still does some external actions that should be
passed through a ulext.External for mocking, but
that's ok for now.
Change-Id: Icc231e7e26393541c312396fec907b640b97718e
* remove alpha badge
* remove information about "beta phase" and "network under construction" from License section
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benten <mail@stefan-benten.de>
This change adds a script and the needed build logic to create a draft github release and then upload the created binaries to it in order to make the actual publishing a lot less error prone.
The logic is currently that it only does this for all github tags, but not for every main build/push. This is handled by the checks in the script itself.
Change-Id: Ie172a8e4a97200de901a26a055aa5a8a54b60a2a
At some point we missed to add metadata key to list objects
response. Because of that uplink is taking key from pb.SteamMeta.
We need to clean it up.
Tests will be added on uplink side.
https://github.com/storj/uplink/issues/71
Change-Id: I3328e2f1b86bca15aeaf89f8e59cdca3c8e97742
We enabled this chore on different satellites
for testing. Works fine so we can enable this
by default for all configurations.
Change-Id: I987639685d8de5c7e5798adca30fe26bdac9e1d1
Currently most of the satellite log is made up by this specific log
message and thus we should increase the log level. We already have
a monkit event tracking this case. In case we need to look into this
more we should just increase the satellite log level.
Change-Id: I27ebed3e6745701c66c83e8c52ddc836ad9d5f4e
added tests for add node (check modal, cancel with separate buttons, add new node, add node that already exists) and more options (change display name, delete node(&cancel delete), copy node ID).
I introduced a change in the UI that was a better way to dynamically
render Svelte components
(https://review.dev.storj.io/c/storj/storj/+/5931/4..5) during the
review of the first version of it, however, while it works perfectly
on development mode it doesn't work when the assets are built for
production, failing silently, because the constructor name get renamed
due to the name mangling caused by the minifyer as stated in the
following issue: https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/issues/6980
This commit use a different alternative not based on the constructor
name and it works fine with the production build.
Change-Id: I643c405f877a9206cf0e51b44d5138e5a9756a79
Migrate the satellite admin UI web app from the Svelte template used to
generate a Svelte App scaffolding to SvelteKit.
There aren't any functional changes in the application, however, the
commit has a lot because:
1. SvelteKit uses a different directory layout and constraints to it, so
the files have been moved.
2. The files have changed its formatting due to the new default linter
configurations that SvelteKit uses.
3. The linter detected some issues with using `object` and `any` types
in Typescript, so they have been replaced by better general types
(e.g. Record).
The migration allows to use the new tooling rather than Rollup
directly, besides that will empower the future of it when it needs more
features (e.g. different routes, etc.).
Change-Id: Ifa6736c13585708337f6c5a59388077b784eaddd
All limits we have for projects have also parent limits stored
with user data. New created project is first taking limits from
owner (user) limits.
This change is extending users table with project_segment_limit
column and adds functionality to get and set value for this
column.
Change-Id: Iff5e36c62b517652390b649fc05992475916ecff
This change disallows creation of users possessing the same email.
If a user attempts to create an account with an email address
that's already used - whether it belongs to an active account or not -
he will be notified of unsuccessful account creation. If he attempts to
log in using an email address belonging to an inactive account,
he will be presented with a link allowing him to re-send the
verification email. Attempting to register with an email address
belonging to an existing account triggers a password reset email.
Change-Id: Iefd8c3bef00ecb1dd9e8504594607aa0dca7d82e
The Add method on the multinode DB interface accepts
a set of parameters which are already fields in the nodes.Node struct
excluding the name field.
When adding a new node, you're forced to call UpdateName() method
after calling the Add() method in order to save a node and update
the name.
This change allows passing the nodes.Node entity which includes
the name field. With this, a new node can be added together with
the name without invoking the UpdateName() method.
Change-Id: I281ec628dffaade35d6db4479a84f39636200072
Added a testplan folder in docs, with a README and TEMPLATE for testplan
We want community involvement with testplans, since we believe that testplans written as early as possible before implementation starts work like a checklist and as soon as we finish the implementation we can compare it to the test plan to check for any bugs. Also even before implementation is finished, if a developer can read a test plan beforehand they can prevent most bugs, hence why we believe that the earlier we write a test plan the more bugs we can prevent.
Co-authored-by: Igor <38665104+ihaid@users.noreply.github.com>
