All the files in uploadselection are (in fact) related to generic node selection, and used not only for upload,
but for download, repair, etc...
Change-Id: Ie4098318a6f8f0bbf672d432761e87047d3762ab
We use two different Node types in `overlay` and `uploadnodeselection` and converting back and forth.
Using the same object would allow us to use a unified node selection interface everywhere.
Change-Id: Ie71e29d60184ee0e5b4547eb54325f09c418f73c
Currently we are using KnownUnreliableOrOffline to get missing pieces
for segment repairer (GetMissingPieces). The issue is that now repairer
is looking at more things than just missing pieces (clumped/off
placement pieces).
KnownReliable was refactored to get data (e.g. country, lastNet) about
all reliable nodes from provided list. List is split into online and
offline. This way we will be able to use results from this method to all
checks: missing pieces, clumped pieces, out of placement pieces.
This this first part of changes to handle different kind of pieces in
segment repairer.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5998
Change-Id: I6cbaf59cff9d6c4346ace75bb814ccd985c0e43e
Up to now, we have been implementing the DistinctIP preference with code
in two places:
1. On check-in, the last_net is determined by taking the /24 or /64
(in ResolveIPAndNetwork()) and we store it with the node record.
2. On node selection, a preference parameter defines whether to return
results that are distinct on last_net.
It can be observed that we have never yet had the need to switch from
DistinctIP to !DistinctIP, or from !DistinctIP to DistinctIP, on the
same satellite, and we will probably never need to do so in an automated
way. It can also be observed that this arrangement makes tests more
complicated, because we often have to arrange for test nodes to have IP
addresses in different /24 networks (a particular pain on macOS).
Those two considerations, plus some pending work on the repair framework
that will make repair take last_net into consideration, motivate this
change.
With this change, in the #2 place, we will _always_ return results that
are distinct on last_net. We implement the DistinctIP preference, then,
by making the #1 place (ResolveIPAndNetwork()) more flexible. When
DistinctIP is enabled, last_net will be calculated as it was before. But
when DistinctIP is _off_, last_net can be the same as address (IP and
port). That will effectively implement !DistinctIP because every
record will have a distinct last_net already.
As a side effect, this flexibility will allow us to change the rules
about last_net construction arbitrarily. We can do tests where last_net
is set to the source IP, or to a /30 prefix, or a /16 prefix, etc., and
be able to exercise the production logic without requiring a virtual
network bridge.
This change should be safe to make without any migration code, because
all known production satellite deployments use DistinctIP, and the
associated last_net values will not change for them. They will only
change for satellites with !DistinctIP, which are mostly test
deployments that can be recreated trivially. For those satellites which
are both permanent and !DistinctIP, node selection will suddenly start
acting as though DistinctIP is enabled, until the operator runs a single
SQL update "UPDATE nodes SET last_net = last_ip_port". That can be done
either before or after deploying software with this change.
I also assert that this will not hurt performance for production
deployments. It's true that adding the distinct requirement to node
selection makes things a little slower, but the distinct requirement is
already present for all production deployments, and they will see no
change.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5391
Change-Id: I0e7e92498c3da768df5b4d5fb213dcd2d4862924
This is in response to community feedback that our existing reputation
calculation is too likely to disqualify storage nodes unfairly with
extreme swings up and down.
For details and analysis, please see the data_loss_vs_dq_chance_sim.py
tool, the "tuning reputation further.ipynb" Jupyter notebook in the
storj/datascience repository, and the discussion at
https://forum.storj.io/t/tuning-audit-scoring/14084
In brief: changing the lambda and initial-alpha parameters in this way
causes the swings in reputation to be smaller and less likely to put a
node past the disqualification threshold unfairly.
Note: this change will cause a one-time reset of all (non-disqualified)
node reputations, because the new initial alpha value of 1000 is
dramatically different, and the disqualification threshold is going to
be much higher.
Change-Id: Id6dc4ba8fde1be3db4255b72282207bab5491ca3
This test had an effective config.Reputation.AuditCount = 0, meaning all
nodes that had _any_ positive audit results were considered vetted.
Because of that, only one node in the test setup was "new". And that
node was marked as being in GE, so could not be returned by node
selection.
The reason the tests still worked is because of the node selection rule
that says "if there are no new nodes at all, just get all reputable
nodes to satisfy the request".
This commit makes it so half of the nodes are vetted and half new, which
makes the test somewhat more interesting (and means we aren't
concentrating too much on testing details of behavior when AuditCount is
0).
Change-Id: I09157b7dc20ecaddd2a6e60cfe146e9186e3603b
prevent network enumeration by rejecting privateIPs in PingMe and
Checkin endpoints
Closesstorj/storj-private#32
Change-Id: I63f00483ff4128ebd5fa9b7b8da826a5706748c9
inconsistency
The original design had a flaw which can potentially cause discrepancy
for nodes reputation status between reputations table and nodes table.
In the event of a failure(network issue, db failure, satellite failure, etc.)
happens between update to reputations table and update to nodes table, data
can be out of sync.
This PR tries to fix above issue by passing through node's reputation from
the beginning of an audit/repair(this data is from nodes table) to the next
update in reputation service. If the updated reputation status from the service
is different from the existing node status, the service will try to update nodes
table. In the case of a failure, the service will be able to try update nodes
table again since it can see the discrepancy of the data. This will allow
both tables to be in-sync eventually.
Change-Id: Ic22130b4503a594b7177237b18f7e68305c2f122
Union query for both reputable and new nodes didn't properly work. The
top level query is required to have an `AS OF SYSTEM TIME` statement as
well.
Change-Id: I8ee6dd5b700c2b1ed2aa562962bfa72be7eec30a
We are no longer planning on implementing downtime penalization using
the method described in
docs/blueprints/archive/storage-node-downtime-tracking-deprecated.md.
Now, we are implementing the design described in
docs/blueprints/storage-node-downtime-tracking-with-audits.md.
This change removes the downtime estimation chores from the satellite
core as well as the package satellite/downtime. A future change will
remove the database table.
Change-Id: I1a1d3cf9dceeba36255d25243294865b89925518
With the new overlay.AuditOutcome type for offline audits, the
IsUp field is redundant. If AuditOutcome != AuditOffline, then
the node is online.
In addition to removing the field itself, other changes needed
to be made regarding the relationship between 'uptime' and 'audits'.
Previously, uptime and audit outcome were completely separated. For
example, it was possible to update a node's stats to give it a
successful/failed/unknown audit while simultaneously indicating that
the node was offline by setting IsUp to false. This is no longer possible
under this changeset. Some test which did this have been changed slightly
in order to pass.
Also add new benchmarks for UpdateStats and BatchUpdateStats with different
audit outcomes.
Change-Id: I998892d615850b1f138dc62f9b050f720ea0926b
Additionally, this PR changes NewNodeFraction devDefault and testplanet config from 0.05 to 1.
This is because many tests relied on selecting nodes that were reputable based on audit and uptime
counts of 0, in effect, selecting new nodes as reputable ones.
However, since reputation is now indicated by a vetted_at db field that is explicitly set
rather than implied by audit and uptime counts, it would be more complicated to try to
update all of the nodes' reputations before selecting nodes for tests.
Now we just allow all test nodes to be new if needed.
Change-Id: Ib9531be77408662315b948fd029cee925ed2ca1d
When a node's audit history "online score" passes below a configured
threshold, the node goes into "offline suspension" mode and begins a
review period, where the operator is given an opportunity to bring their
node back online.
After the review period passes, offline suspension is turned off for the
node.
In the future, if a node still has a bad online score at the end of the
review period, it will be disqualified. This is disabled right now.
In the future, if a node is in offline suspension, it will be treated as
"unhealthy". Right now, there are no consequences for being in offline
suspension.
Minor changes:
* Moves AuditHistoryConfig out of UpdateStats/BatchUpdateStats args and
into UpdateRequest.
* Adds "now" argument to UpdateStats/BatchUpdateStats args for easy
testing.
* Changes formatting strings inside buildUpdateStatement to use specific
types.
Change-Id: I032b60298840fc16e6ef831da750f2d57619a397
What: As soon as a node passes the vetting criteria (total_audit_count and total_uptime_count
are greater than the configured thresholds), we set vetted_at to the current timestamp.
Why: We may want to use this timestamp in future development to select new vs vetted nodes.
It also allows flexibility in node vetting experiments and allows for better metrics around
vetting times.
Please describe the tests: satellitedb_test: TestUpdateStats and TestBatchUpdateStats make sure vetted_at is set appropriately
Please describe the performance impact: This change does add extra logic to BatchUpdateStats and UpdateStats and
commits another variable to the db (vetted_at), but this should be negligible.
Change-Id: I3de804549b5f1bc359da4935bc859758ceac261d
Also distinguish the purpose for selecting nodes to avoid potential
confusion, what should allow caching and what shouldn't.
Change-Id: Iee2451c1f10d0f1c81feb1641507400d89918d61
The UpdateAddress method use to be used when storage node's checked in with the Satellite, but once the contact service was created this method was no longer used. This PR finally removes it.
Change-Id: Ib3f83c8003269671d97d54f21ee69665fa663f24
Adds a test to make sure that the correct amount of total nodes,
reputable nodes, and new nodes are returned by SelectStorageNodes
in different cases.
Change-Id: I0939159600afde8a46c35735f1edf0576fcdb4cd
* change overlay.UpdateStats to allow a third audit outcome. Now it can
handle successful, failed, and unknown audits.
* when "unknown audit reputation"
(unknownAuditAlpha/(unknownAuditAlpha+unknownAuditBeta)) falls below the
DQ threshold, put node into suspension.
* when unknown audit reputation goes above the DQ threshold, remove node
from suspension.
* record unknown audits from audit reporter.
* add basic tests around unknown audits and suspension.
Change-Id: I125f06f3af52e8a29ba48dc19361821a9ff1daa1
My understanding is that the nodes table has the following fields:
- `address` field which can be a hostname or an IP
- `last_net` field that is the /24 subnet of the IP resolved from the address
This PR does the following:
1) add back the `last_ip` field to the nodes table
2) for uplink operations remove the calls that the satellite makes to `lookupNodeAddress` (which makes the DNS calls to resolve the IP from the hostname) and instead use the data stored in the nodes table `last_ip` field. This means that the IP that the satellite sends to the uplink for the storage nodes could be approx 1 hr stale. In the short term this is fine, next we will be adding changes so that the storage node pushes any IP changes to the satellite in real time.
3) use the address field for repair and audit since we want them to still make DNS calls to confirm the IP is up to date
4) try to reduce confusion about hostname, ip, subnet, and address in the code base
Change-Id: I96ce0d8bb78303f82483d0701bc79544b74057ac
On satellite, remove all references to free_bandwidth column in nodes table.
On storage node, remove references to AllocatedBandwidth and MinimumBandwidth and mark as deprecated.
Protobuf message, NodeCapacity, is left intact for backwards compatibility.
Once this is released to all satellites, we can drop the column from the DB.
Change-Id: I2ff6c6537fc9008a0c5588e951afea58ede85838
Curently, storage nodes only report their capacity to satellites
once per hour. If a node fills up, it will fail all uploads until
the next contact cycle begins. With these changes, at the end of an
upload we check whether the MinimumDiskSpace threshold has been
passed. If so, trigger the monitor chore to update the node's
capacity, then trigger the contact chore to report the new
capacity to the satellites
Change-Id: Ie6aadaade1e2c12c87e03f8ff9059a50121380a0
Currently SNs report their free disk space once per hour. If a node
becomes full, it has to wait until the next contact cycle begins to
report; all the while receiving and failing upload requests. By increasing
the minimum required disk space, we can give the storage nodes more time
to report their space before the completely fill up. This change goes
hand-in-hand with another change we want to implement: trigger capacity
report on SN immediately upon falling below threshold.
Change-Id: I12f778286c6c3f582438b0e2949765ac43325e27
Adds ExcludedIPs to the NodeCriteria for selecting new storage
nodes. Previously, ExcludedIPs was only added to the NodeCriteria
for selecting reputable storage nodes. Now that both are included
in the FindStorageNodesWithPreferences call, it should no longer
be possible to repair pieces to nodes that are on the same IP as
nodes already storing pieces from that segment.
Adds TestSelectNewStorageNodesExcludedIPs to make sure that
SelectNewStorageNodes returns nodes with different IP addresses.
https://storjlabs.atlassian.net/browse/V3-3011
Change-Id: Ic2d5e607cadeba6e8d5c40f9717149cb30880335
With the new storage node downtime tracking feature, we need remove current uptime reputation configs: UptimeReputationAlpha, UptimeReputationBeta, and
UptimeReputationDQ. This is the first step of removing the uptime
reputation columns from satellitedb
Change-Id: Ie8fab13295dbf545e33aeda0c4306cda4ba54e36
