all permissions
Without read and list permissions BeginObjectDelete won't return error
if occurs. This was breaking Batch processing because there was
assumption that without error response will be always not nil.
https://storjlabs.atlassian.net/browse/SM-590
Change-Id: I0fc9539e429110a660eb28725b266d5e4771d198
This change is a special case for batch processing. If in batch request
CommitSegment and CommitObject are one after another we can execute
these requests as one. This will avoid current logic where we are saving
pointer for CommitSegment and later we are deleting this pointer and
saving it once again as under last segment path for CommitObject.
This change should handle issue we have in older uplinks with incorrect
order of storing pointers.
Change-Id: I86514c95df169e6fbc91b52e5117472cae70cb8b
This reverts commit 8772867855.
for uplink versions v0.25.0 through v0.30.7, there's a bug with multiplesegment upload
where the last segment is inline caused by this commit.
Change-Id: If375e186b23265586caf08991c25980e99f3cc1a
This change is a special case for batch processing. If in batch request
CommitSegment and CommitObject are one after another we can execute
these request as one. This will avoid current logic where we are saving
pointer for CommitSegment and later we are deleting this pointer and
saving it once again as under last segment path for CommitObject.
Change-Id: If170e78c8410f5ba5916cbff6a29b9221db9ce2e
What: we move api keys out of the grpc connection-level metadata on the client side and into the request protobufs directly. the server side still supports both mechanisms for backwards compatibility.
Why: dRPC won't support connection-level metadata. the only thing we currently use connection-level metadata for is api keys. we need to move all information needed by a request into the request protobuf itself for drpc support. check out the .proto changes for the main details.
One fun side-fact: Did you know that protobuf fields 1-15 are special and only use one byte for both the field number and type? Additionally did you know we don't use field 15 anywhere yet? So the new request header will use field 15, and should use field 15 on all protobufs going forward.
Please describe the tests: all existing tests should pass
Please describe the performance impact: none
