* pkg/pg: Add new service function storage node
Add a new service function to the storage node piece store for deleting
pieces when satellites request them.
* storagenode/piecestore: Add endpoint to delete piece
Add a new endpoint to receive from trusted satellites to delete a piece.
* private/testplanet: Fix storagenode mock
Add to the storagenode mock the new endpoint method.
* proto.lock: Update it with the last protbuff changes
* storagenode/piecestore: Reuse test piece upload
Extract the repeated logic from several tests functions for uploading a
test piece to a test helper function.
* uplink/piecestore: Implement client side method
Implement the client side method of the new piecestore RPC function.
* storagenode/piecestore: Add test DeletePiece endpoint
Implement a test for the DeletePiece new endpoint method.
We don't use reverse listing in any of our code, outside of tests, and
it is only exposed through libuplink in the
lib/uplink.(*Project).ListBuckets() API. We also don't know of any users
who might have a need for reverse listing through ListBuckets().
Since one of our prospective pointerdb backends can not support
backwards iteration, and because of the above considerations, we are
going to remove the reverse listing feature.
Change-Id: I8d2a1f33d01ee70b79918d584b8c671f57eef2a0
* add signatures, fix process loop bug, move delete to on success
* added tests for signatures
* PR comment updates
* fixed setting reason by default.
* updates for PR comments
* added signed failure when verificationi fails
* moved to sign_test
* fix panic
* removed testplanet from test
* add overall failure percentage check and inactive time frame check before sending a response to sno
* update comment
* delete node from transfer queue if it has been inactive for too long
* fix linting error
* add test config value
* fix nil pointer
* add config value into testplanet
* add unit test for overall failure threshold
* move timeframe threshold to chore
* update protolock
* add chore test
* add per peiece failure count logic
* change config name from EndpointMaxFailures to MaxFailuresPerPiece
* address comments
* fix linting error
* add error handling for no row returned from progress table
* fix test for graceful exit chore on storagenode
* fix typo InActive -> Inactive
* improve readability for failure threshold calculation
* update config lock
* change error handling for GetProgress in graceful exit endpoint on the satellite side
* return proper rpc error in endpoint
* add check in chore test for checking finish timestamp and queue
* add exit-status command
* remove todo and fix format
* fix status display
* change startExit to exit progress
* fix linting error
* add successful column in exit progress
* fix test
* remove extra new line
* fix TYPOS
* format the percentage better
* create upsert query for check-in method
* add tests
* fix lint err
* add benchmark test for db query
* fix lint and tests
* add a unit test, fix lint
* add address to tests
* replace print w/ b.Fatal
* refactor query per CR comments
* fix disqualified, only set if null
* fix query
* add version to updatecheckin query
* fix version
* fix tests
* change version for tests
* add version to tests
* add IP, add transport, mv unit test
* use node.address as arg
* add last ip
* fix lint
What: we move api keys out of the grpc connection-level metadata on the client side and into the request protobufs directly. the server side still supports both mechanisms for backwards compatibility.
Why: dRPC won't support connection-level metadata. the only thing we currently use connection-level metadata for is api keys. we need to move all information needed by a request into the request protobuf itself for drpc support. check out the .proto changes for the main details.
One fun side-fact: Did you know that protobuf fields 1-15 are special and only use one byte for both the field number and type? Additionally did you know we don't use field 15 anywhere yet? So the new request header will use field 15, and should use field 15 on all protobufs going forward.
Please describe the tests: all existing tests should pass
Please describe the performance impact: none
this is a trivial operation for storagenode/console, as it doesn't
really need or use kademlia in the first place.
What:
Removes kademlia from storagenode/console
Why:
We are in the process of getting rid of kademlia, and this is one place where it's particularly easy.
Please describe the tests:
Existing tests exercise storagenode/console behavior; if they continue to work, everything here should be tested satisfactorily.
Please describe the performance impact:
None
* add init contact proto
* make 2 svcs
* add geenerated proto code
* fux conflict with NodeRequest name
* use correct version on proto
* rm extra node fields
* add protolock
* update field names so they are better
* rm node id since we dont need it
What: this change makes sure the count of segments is not encrypted.
Why: having the segment count encrypted just makes things hard for no reason - a satellite operator can figure out how many segments an object has by looking at the other segments in the database. but if a user has access but has lost their encryption key, they now can't clean up or delete old segments because they can't know how many there are without just guessing until they get errors. :(
Backwards compatibility: clients will still understand old pointers and will still write old pointers. at some point in the future perhaps we can do a migration for remaining old pointers so we can delete the old code.
Please describe the tests: covered by existing tests
Please describe the performance impact: none
Deprecate the pieceinfo database, and start storing piece info as a header to
piece files. Institute a "storage format version" concept allowing us to handle
pieces stored under multiple different types of storage. Add a piece_expirations
table which will still be used to track expiration times, so we can query it, but
which should be much smaller than the pieceinfo database would be for the
same number of pieces. (Only pieces with expiration times need to be stored in piece_expirations, and we don't need to store large byte blobs like the serialized
order limit, etc.) Use specialized names for accessing any functionality related
only to dealing with V0 pieces (e.g., `store.V0PieceInfo()`). Move SpaceUsed-
type functionality under the purview of the piece store. Add some generic
interfaces for traversing all blobs or all pieces. Add lots of tests.
