the new bus_factor calculation doesn't make sense with different classes, as we have overlaps.
For example: it can detect a risk if we loose one country and one different subnet (with possible overlap).
It's better to calculate the stat and bus_factor per class (net, country, ...).
It also makes it easier to measure execution time per class.
Change-Id: I7d4d5f7cb811cd50c5831077b43e001908aab96b
To make sure that Benchmark tests are good, we run them with -short flag, eg:
```
go test -short -run=BenchmarkDurabilityProcess
```
Durability benchmark already supports this, but we can make it slightly more faster with
using less sgements and pieces during the `-short` run.
Change-Id: I9547ca1e3cd0178eb395a7a388f2e7936a9862d7
Currently, graceful exit is a complicated subsystem that keeps a queue
of all pieces expected to be on a node, and asks the node to transfer
those pieces to other nodes one by one. The complexity of the system
has, unfortunately, led to numerous bugs and unexpected behaviors.
We have decided to remove this entire subsystem and restructure graceful
exit as follows:
* Nodes will signal their intent to exit gracefully
* The satellite will not send any new pieces to gracefully exiting nodes
* Pieces on gracefully exiting nodes will be considered by the repair
subsystem as "retrievable but unhealthy". They will be repaired off of
the exiting node as needed.
* After one month (with an appropriately high online score), the node
will be considered exited, and held amounts for the node will be
released. The repair worker will continue to fetch pieces from the
node as long as the node stays online.
* If, at the end of the month, a node's online score is below a certain
threshold, its graceful exit will fail.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/6042
Change-Id: I52d4e07a4198e9cb2adf5e6cee2cb64d6f9f426b
When we do `satellite run api --placement '...'`, the placement rules are not parsed well.
The problem is based on `viper.AllSettings()`, and the main logic is sg. like this (from a new unit test):
```
r := ConfigurablePlacementRule{}
err := r.Set(p)
require.NoError(t, err)
serialized := r.String()
r2 := ConfigurablePlacementRule{}
err = r2.Set(serialized)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, p, r2.String())
```
All settings evaluates the placement rules in `ConfigurablePlacementRules` and stores the string representation.
The problem is that we don't have proper `String()` implementation (it prints out the structs instead of the original definition.
There are two main solutions for this problem:
1. We can fix the `String()`. When we parse a placement rule, the `String()` method should print out the original definition
2. We can switch to use pure string as configuration parameter, and parse the rules only when required.
I feel that 1 is error prone, we can do it (and in this patch I added a lot of `String()` implementations, but it's hard to be sure that our `String()` logic is inline with the parsing logic.
Therefore I decided to make the configuration value of the placements a string (or a wrapper around string).
That's the main reason why this patch seems to be big, as I updated all the usages.
But the main part is in beginning of the `placement.go` (configuration parsing is not a pflag.Value implementation any more, but a separated step).
And `filter.go`, (a few more String implementation for filters.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/6248
Change-Id: I47c762d3514342b76a2e85683b1c891502a0756a
Currently, we have issue were while counting unhealthy pieces we are
counting twice piece which is in excluded country and is outside segment
placement. This can cause unnecessary repair.
This change is also doing another step to move RepairExcludedCountryCodes
from overlay config into repair package.
Change-Id: I3692f6e0ddb9982af925db42be23d644aec1963f
placement.AllowedCountry is the old way to specify placement, with the new approach we can use a more generic (dynamic method), which can check full node information instead of just the country code.
The 90% of this patch is just search and replace:
* we need to use NodeFilters instead of placement.AllowedCountry
* which means, we need an initialized PlacementRules available everywhere
* which means we need to configure the placement rules
The remaining 10% is the placement.go, where we introduced a new type of configuration (lightweight expression language) to define any kind of placement without code change.
Change-Id: Ie644b0b1840871b0e6bbcf80c6b50a947503d7df
Currently we are using Reliable to get missing pieces for repair
checker. The issue is that now checker is looking at more things than
just missing pieces (clumped/off, placement pieces) and using only node
ID is not enough. We have issue where we are skipping offline nodes from
clumped and off placement pieces check.
Reliable was refactored to get data (e.g. country, lastNet) about all
reliable nodes. List is split into online and offline. This data will be
cached for quick use by repair checker. It will be also possible to
check nodes metadata like country code or lastNet.
We are also slowly moving `RepairExcludedCountryCodes` config from
overlay to repair which makes more sens for it.
This this first part of changes.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5998
Change-Id: If534342488c0e440affc2894a8fbda6507b8959d
We want to eliminate usages of LoopSegmentEntry.Pieces, because it is
costing a lot of cpu time to look up node IDs with every piece of every
segment we read.
In this change, we are eliminating use of LoopSegmentEntry.Pieces in the
node tally observer (both the ranged loop and segments loop variants).
It is not necessary to have a fully resolved nodeID until it is time to
store totals in the database. We can use NodeAliases as the map key
instead, and resolve NodeIDs just before storing totals.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5622
Change-Id: Iec12aa393072436d7c22cc5a4ae1b63966cbcc18
It was surprising that `satellite auditor` complained about SMTP mail settings, even if it's not supposed to sending any mail.
Looks like we can remove the mail service dependency, as it's not a hard requirement for overlay.Service.
Change-Id: I29a52eeff3f967ddb2d74a09458dc0ee2f051bd7
Segments loop have build-in sanity check to verify if number of segments
processed by loop is roughly fine. We want to have the same verification
for ranged loop.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5544
Change-Id: Ia19edc0fb4aa8dc45993498a8e6a4eb5928485e9
implemented observer and partial, created new structures to keep mon
metrics remain in same way as in segment loop
Change-Id: I209c126096c84b94d4717332e56238266f6cd004
Add node tally ranged loop observer and partial.
Add node tally randed observer to range loop peer.
Add config flag to select which loop to use for node tally.
Update satellite core to use segement/ranged loop based on a flag.
Duplicate existing node tally test but using ranged loop.
Change-Id: I6786f1a16933463fab5f79601bf438203a7a5f9e
Add option AsOfSystemTime to segment provider to make it equivalent to
the old segment loop.
There's no comment on what it does because it's pretty complex and
makes no sense, but we can improve it later.
closes https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5434
Change-Id: I8f09b03803e681e2fd41008c5dba67804b0f37a1
Add an observer to monitor ranged segment loop progress.
Tested by running the segment loop in storj-up and navigating to
http://<container>:11111/mon/stats and there is the entry:
rangedloop-live,scope=storj.io/storj/satellite/metabase/rangedloop numSegments=364523630000.000000
part of https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5223
Change-Id: If3d2774d2f17f51eac86f47c6dda1fb8ad696dfe
added in storj-sim rangedloop for each satellite, to verify it works for metrics oveserver,
removed identity from rangedloop peer as we never use it, added logs on service run, added loop
to service instead of endless for loop, interval value to config
Closes: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5414
Change-Id: Ibc3b06071b68feda4a35b45da2bbe36e22a02fc8
This change implements the ranged loop observer to replace the audit
chore that builds the audit queue.
The strategy employed by this change is to use a collector for each
segment range to build separate per-node segment reservoirs that are
then merge them during the join step.
In previous observer migrations, there were only a handful of tests so
the strategy was to duplicate them. In this package, there are dozens
of tests that utilize the chore. To reduce code churn and maintenance
burden until the chore is removed, this change introduces a helper that
runs tests under both the chore and observer, providing a pair of
functions that can be used to pause or run the queueing function.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5232
Change-Id: I8bb4b4e55cf98b1aac9f26307e3a9a355cb3f506
The tests are forked from the chore tests with slight adaptations for
being run against the ranged loop. I also moved a benchmark for the
database from chore_test.go to db_test.go.
The pathcollector is reused as a rangedloop.Partial.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5234
Change-Id: I56182031d133812a9f4d4a433c01b9150af39f31
Some observers assume that they will observe all the segments for a
given stream, and that they will observe those segments in a sequential
stream over one or more iterations.
This change updates the range provider from rangedlooptest to provide
these guarantees.
The change also removes the Mock suffix from the provider/splitter types
since the package name (rangedlooptest) implies that the type is a test
double.
Change-Id: I927c409807e305787abcde57427baac22f663eaa
Minimal implementation of the ranged (=threaded) segment loop
service, to improve performance over the existing loop.
Has tests with a an inmemory segment database
and example observer.
Does not have yet: database link, observer duration tracking,
suspicious processed ratio guard, rate limiting, minimum execution
interval per observer, etc.
Part of https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5223
Change-Id: I08ffb392c3539e380f4e7b4f1afd56c4c394668d
