When pieces fail an audit (hard fail, meaning the node acknowledged it
did not have the piece or the piece was corrupted), we will now remove
those pieces from the segment.
Previously, we did not do this, and some node operators were seeing the
same missing piece audited over and over again and losing reputation
every time.
This change will include both verification and reverification audits. It
will also apply to pieces found to be bad during repair, if
repair-to-reputation reporting is enabled.
Change-Id: I0ca7af7e3fecdc0aebbd34fee4be3a0eab53f4f7
* Don't use rpcstatus.Unknown as an indicator of dial failure; instead,
GetShare now indicates with a per-share field where a failure happened
(DialFailure, RequestFailure, NoFailure). Use that information in
Verify() to determine how to treat the source node.
* Add a test that replaces a storage node with a black hole, so that
connections there will always time out. Make sure we handle that case
correctly.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5632
Change-Id: I513a53520fb48b7187d4c4d7e14e01e2cfc0a721
We automatically start a chore to check whether the blobstore is
writeable and readable, however, we don't want to fail the tests due to
that reason. Usually we want to test some other failure.
There probably should be some nicer way to achieve this, but this is an
easier fix.
Change-Id: I77ada75329f88d3ea52edd2022e811e337c5255a
The blobstore implementation is entirely related to storagenode, so the
rightful place is together with the storagenode implementation.
Fixes https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5754
Change-Id: Ie6637b0262cf37af6c3e558556c7604d9dc3613d
We are supposed to wait for some amount of time after a timed-out audit
before retrying the audit on the contained node. We are also supposed to
wait for some amount of time before subsequent retries, if they are
necessary. The test added here tries to assure that those delays happen,
as far as it is possible to assure that a delay will happen in computer
code.
The previous behavior of the system was, in fact, to carry out
Reverifies as soon as a worker could retrieve the job from the
reverification queue. That's not a very major problem, as subsequent
retries do have a delay and the node does get several retries. Still, it
was not ideal, and this test exposed that mismatch with expectations, so
this commit includes a minor change to effect that pause between verify
and the first reverify.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5499
Change-Id: I83bb79c166a458ba59a2db2d17c85eca43ca90f0
This commit introduces tests that perform multiple concurrent audits
against the same storage node, to make sure that doing so does not
create incorrect outcomes.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5495
Change-Id: Iaae49e042306bfa59bdf04c1a1540667488e51e5
This change implements the ranged loop observer to replace the audit
chore that builds the audit queue.
The strategy employed by this change is to use a collector for each
segment range to build separate per-node segment reservoirs that are
then merge them during the join step.
In previous observer migrations, there were only a handful of tests so
the strategy was to duplicate them. In this package, there are dozens
of tests that utilize the chore. To reduce code churn and maintenance
burden until the chore is removed, this change introduces a helper that
runs tests under both the chore and observer, providing a pair of
functions that can be used to pause or run the queueing function.
https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5232
Change-Id: I8bb4b4e55cf98b1aac9f26307e3a9a355cb3f506
Now that all the reverification changes have been made and the old code
is out of the way, this commit renames the new things back to the old
names. Mostly, this involves renaming "newContainment" to "containment"
or "NewContainment" to "Containment", but there are a few other renames
that have been promised and are carried out here.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5230
Change-Id: I34e2b857ea338acbb8421cdac18b17f2974f233c
Now that we are doing scalable piecewise reverifications, the code for
handling the old way of doing things (containment, pending audits,
reporting, testing) can now be removed.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5230
Change-Id: Ief1a75f423eff682e8f3d57804e343b3409a6631
This commit pulls the big switch! We have been setting up piecewise
reverifications (the workers for which can be scaled independently of
the core) for several commits now, and this commit actually begins
making use of them.
The core of this commit is fairly small, but it requires changing the
semantics in all the tests that relate to reverifications, so it ends up
being a large change. The changes to the tests are mostly mechanical and
repetitive, though, so reviewers needn't worry much.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5230
Change-Id: Ibb421cc021664fd6e0096ffdf5b402a69b2d6f18
This method on the Verifier allows the caller to find, out of the nodes
holding pieces in a given segment, which ones are contained.
This method is not yet being used. It will be in a future commit.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5230
Change-Id: I242cd999913ca4dabbe8a62767ed4869b31fca04
NewContainment will replace Containment later in this commit chain, but
for now it is not yet being used.
NewContainment will allow a node to be contained for multiple pending
reverify jobs at a time. It is implemented by way of the reverify queue.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5231
Change-Id: I126eda0b3dfc4710a88fe4a5f41780618ec19101
As part of the effort of splitting out the auditor workers to their own
process, we are transitioning the communication between the auditor
chore and the verification workers to a queue implemented in the
database, rather than the sequence of in-memory queues we used to use.
This logical database is safely partitionable from the rest of
satelliteDB.
Refs: https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/5251
Change-Id: I6cd31ac5265423271fbafe6127a86172c5cb53dc
The MinDownloadTimeout 950ms and delay of 1s were quiet close, possibly
causing flaky behavior in TestVerifierSlowDownload.
Change-Id: I4f6c1554a118b21427357642abe39986fd0af38d
For nodes in excluded areas, we don't necessarily want to remove them
from the pointer, but we do want to increase the number of pieces in the
segment in case those excluded area nodes go down. To do that, we
increase the number of pieces repaired by the number of pieces in
excluded areas.
Change-Id: I0424f1bcd7e93f33eb3eeeec79dbada3b3ea1f3a
In addition to upgrading the storj.io/common library, this change
moves off the TCPConnector in favor of the HybridConnector per
the deprecation warning.
Change-Id: I7e7e1e7568e8b95e4a99ad9caa158a799e68e1e3
inconsistency
The original design had a flaw which can potentially cause discrepancy
for nodes reputation status between reputations table and nodes table.
In the event of a failure(network issue, db failure, satellite failure, etc.)
happens between update to reputations table and update to nodes table, data
can be out of sync.
This PR tries to fix above issue by passing through node's reputation from
the beginning of an audit/repair(this data is from nodes table) to the next
update in reputation service. If the updated reputation status from the service
is different from the existing node status, the service will try to update nodes
table. In the case of a failure, the service will be able to try update nodes
table again since it can see the discrepancy of the data. This will allow
both tables to be in-sync eventually.
Change-Id: Ic22130b4503a594b7177237b18f7e68305c2f122
Since we are sharing the reporting logic between repair and audit. We
need to remove metric reporting logic in reporter.
Change-Id: Ib87295ab19079329e7438327d785a7f5c21d3b21
At some point we moved metabase package outside Metainfo
but we didn't do that for satellite structure. This change
refactors only tests.
When uplink will be adjusted we can remove old entries in
Metainfo struct.
Change-Id: I2b66ed29f539b0ec0f490cad42c72840e0351bcb
In most situations where we would not get enough shares to complete
an audit, something has probably gone wrong like a forgotten delete,
and nodes should not be failed. We have an alert when this occurs.
Check the logs to see what happened. If we decide the nodes should
get audit failures, we can do it manually.
Change-Id: Ib6e408082048d31197c37ebfd7f9031135fc938f
metabase has become a central concept and it's more suitable for it to
be directly nested under satellite rather than being part of metainfo.
metainfo is going to be the "endpoint" logic for handling requests.
Change-Id: I53770d6761ac1e9a1283b5aa68f471b21e784198
At some point we might try to change original segment RS values and set Pieces according to the new values. This change adds add NewRedundancy parameter for UpdateSegmentPieces method to give ability to do that. As a part of change NewPieces are validated against NewRedundancy.
Change-Id: I8ea531c9060b5cd283d3bf4f6e4c320099dd5576
We now have the piece hashes verified for all segments on all production
satellites. We can remove the code that handles the case where piece
hashes are not verified. This would make easier the migration of
services from PointerDB to the new metabase.
For consistency, PieceHashesVerified is still set to true in PointerDB
for new segments.
Change-Id: Idf0ccce4c8d01ae812f11e8384a7221d90d4c183
Make metainfo.RSConfig a valid pflag config value. This allows us to
configure the RSConfig as a string like k/m/o/n-shareSize, which makes
having multiple supported RS schemes easier in the future.
RS-related config values that are no longer needed have been removed
(MinTotalThreshold, MaxTotalThreshold, MaxBufferMem, Verify).
Change-Id: I0178ae467dcf4375c504e7202f31443d627c15e1
A year ago we made the audit service deleting expired segments.
Meanwhile, we introduced an expired deletetion sub-service in the
metainfo service which sole purpose is deleting expired segments.
Therefore, now we are removing this responsibility from the audit
service. It will continue to avoid reporting failures on expired
segments, but it would not delete them anymore.
We do this to cleanup responsibilities in advance of the metainfo
refactoring.
Change-Id: Id7aab2126f9289dbb5b0bdf7331ba7a3328730e4
This preserves the last_ip_and_port field from node lookups through
CreateAuditOrderLimits() and CreateAuditOrderLimit(), so that later
calls to (*Verifier).GetShare() can try to use that IP and port. If a
connection to the given IP and port cannot be made, or the connection
cannot be verified and secured with the target node identity, an
attempt is made to connect to the original node address instead.
A similar change is not necessary to the other Create*OrderLimits
functions, because they already replace node addresses with the cached
IP and port as appropriate. We might want to consider making a similar
change to CreateGetRepairOrderLimits(), though.
The audit situation is unique because the ramifications are especially
powerful when we get the address wrong. Failing a single audit can have
a heavy cost to a storage node. We need to make extra effort in order
to avoid imposing that cost unfairly.
Situation 1: If an audit fails because the repair worker failed to make
a DNS query (which might well be the fault on the satellite side), and
we have last_ip_and_port information available for the target node, it
would be unfair not to try connecting to that last_ip_and_port address.
Situation 2: If a node has changed addresses recently and the operator
correctly changed its DNS entry, but we don't bother querying DNS, it
would be unfair to penalize the node for our failure to connect to it.
So the audit worker must try both last_ip_and_port _and_ the node
address as supplied by the SNO.
We elect here to try last_ip_and_port first, on the grounds that (a) it
is expected to work in the large majority of cases, and (b) there
should not be any security concerns with connecting to an out-or-date
address, and (c) avoiding DNS queries on the satellite side helps
alleviate satellite operational load.
Change-Id: I9bf6c6c79866d879adecac6144a6c346f4f61200
The VerifyPieceHashes method has a sanity check for the number pieces to
be removed from the pointer after the audit for verifying the piece
hashes.
This sanity check failed when we executed the command on the production
satellites because the Verify command removes Fails and PendingAudits
nodes from the audit report if piece_hashes_verified = false.
A new temporary UsedToVerifyPieceHashes flag is added to
audits.Verifier. It is set to true only by the verify-piece-hashes
command. If the flag is true then the Verify method will always include
Fails and PendingAudits nodes in the report.
Test case is added to cover this use case.
Change-Id: I2c7cb6b12029d52b2fc565365eee0826c3de6ee8
Jira: https://storjlabs.atlassian.net/browse/PG-69
There are a number of segments with piece_hashes_verified = false in
their metadata) on US-Central-1, Europe-West-1, and Asia-East-1
satellites. Most probably, this happened due to a bug we had in the
past. We want to verify them before executing the main migration to
metabase. This would simplify the main migration to metabase with one
less issue to think about.
Change-Id: I8831af1a254c560d45bb87d7104e49abd8242236
* The audit worker wants to get items from the queue and process them.
* The audit chore wants to create new queues and swap them in when the
old queue has been processed.
This change adds a "Queues" struct which handles the concurrency
issues around the worker fetching a queue and the chore swapping a new
queue in. It simplifies the logic of the "Queue" struct to its bare
bones, so that it behaves like a normal queue with no need to understand
the details of swapping and worker/chore interactions.
Change-Id: Ic3689ede97a528e7590e98338cedddfa51794e1b
satellite.DB.Console().Projects().GetAll database query
can be replaced with planet.Uplinks[0].Projects[0].ID
Change-Id: I73b82b91afb2dde7b690917345b798f9d81f6831
If a segment is deleted, is modified, or expires during an audit, this
is not problematic, so we should not return errors. Functionally,
nothing changes, but our metrics around audit success rate will be
improved after this change.
Change-Id: Ic11df056b2c73894b67a55894bd4d58c00470606
* Do not swap the active audit queue with the pending audit queue until
the active audit queue is empty.
* Do not begin creating a new pending audit queue until the existing
pending audit queue has been swapped to the active queue.
Change-Id: I81db5bfa01458edb8cdbe71f5baeebdcb1b94317
TestVerifierSlowDownload would sometimes not have enough nodes finish in
the allotted deadline period. This increases the deadline and also does
not assert that exactly 3 have finished. Instead, in keeping with the
purpose of the test, it asserts that the slow download is never counted
as a success and is always counted as a pending audit in the final
report.
Change-Id: I180734fcc4a499420c75164bad6253ed155d87de
Instead of providing the database from outside to testplanet create it
inside and then allow wrapping and modifying it. This is more convenient
to use.
Change-Id: I9b8f69e6e0a19ff984b4e2bfe927c9100c77bc6c
