Components related to project usage costs have been updated to show
different estimations for each partner, and the satellite has been
updated to send the client the information it needs to do this.
Previously, project costs in the satellite frontend were estimated
using only the price model corresponding to the partner that the user
registered with. This caused users who had a project containing
differently-attributed buckets to see an incorrect price estimation.
Resolvesstorj/storj-private#186
Change-Id: I2531643bc49f24fcb2e5f87e528b552285b6ff20
Add and implement interface to manage customer balances. Adds ability to
add credit to a user's balance, list balance transactions, and get the
balance.
Change-Id: I7fd65d07868bb2b7489d1141a5e9049514d6984e
Add columns package_plan and purchased_package_at to stripe_customers
table and add methods to update and select these values from console
service and payments accounts.
Change-Id: I1e89909055cc3054bfb7baa33c9dca3dfdc7336e
Commit fb59974 disabled usage price overrides because of a failing
test. This change reenables it while resolving the issue that caused
the test to fail.
The previous version of the test passed Gerrit verification and was
merged, but it failed for the primary Jenkins pipeline after merge.
This is due to a difference in how the Jenkins build runs Cockroach
and Postgres for each pipeline.
This commit rewrites the test to be safe for concurrent execution by
ensuring any mutable variables are defined within each test so that
shared state across tests is reduced.
Change-Id: Ia4566c9cd2d698afdb2caa4b7e2808b17e18de4e
Project usage price overriding has been removed because it produces
incorrect results when tested. It should not be re-implemented until
the issues it causes are resolved.
Change-Id: Ic92eff374c9af4fea3bf32782a72303a7978b055
This change causes the bucket's partner info to be used rather than the
user's when calculating project usage prices. This ensures that users
who own differently-partnered buckets will be charged correctly for
usage based on the specific bucket they are utilizing.
according to the bucket's partner.
Related to storj/storj-private#90
Change-Id: Ieeedfcc5451e254216918dcc9f096758be6a8961
This change allows for overriding project usage prices for a specific
partner so that users who sign up with that partner do not need their
invoices to be manually adjusted.
Relates to storj/storj-private#90
Change-Id: Ia54a9cc7c2f8064922bbb15861f974e5dea82d5a
Implemented project delete endpoint for REST API.
Added project usage status check service method to indicate if project can be deleted.
Updated project invoice status check method to indicate if project can be deleted.
Change-Id: I57dc96efb072517144252001ab5405446c9cdeb4
Users signing up through a url containing a promo code will have that code applied to their stripe account instead of the free tier coupon.
Change-Id: I071041b0934648ef3f5bdb05b6ec97c400f89ae4
Because of our free/paid tier plan, we do not need a paywall anymore. We
have not used it in a while, but still have leftover code laying around.
Change-Id: Iaea8c39faf042a2f7a6b837727bb135c8bdf2907
The same was that our Admin API handles project and account deletions currently, we would like
to have the same checks on the user-facing API. This PR adds the same checks to the console service.
General more applicable checks have been moved directly into the payments service.
In addition it adds the BucketsDB to the console DB, to have easier access and avoiding import cycles with
the metainfo package.
A small cleanup around our unnecessary monkit imports made it in as well.
Change-Id: I8769b01c2271c1687fbd2269a738a41764216e51
Jira: https://storjlabs.atlassian.net/browse/USR-822
This the last step of dropping these 2 db tables. It also deletes all
code associate with them.
Change-Id: I8be840dc2a7be255cf6308c9434b729fe4d9391e
Add a config so that some percent of users require credit cards /
account balances
in order to create a project or have a promotional coupon applied
UI was updated to match needed paywall status
At this point we decided not to use a field to store if a user is in an
A/B
test, and instead just use math to see if they're in a test. We decided
to use MD5 (because its in Postgres too) and User UUID for that math.
Change-Id: I0fcd80707dc29afc668632d078e1b5a7a24f3bb3
