When deleting a bucket, make sure that object copies in other buckets are
promoted to new ancestor and left in a working state.
Closes https://github.com/storj/storj/issues/4591
Change-Id: I019d916cd6de5ed51dd0dd25f47c35d0ec666af6
This change introduce problems with server side move so
let's revert it for now. Problem was found when latest
version of storj/storj was used in uplink tests.
This reverts commit 1ef06fae99.
Change-Id: I4d4fad5d1ea04ba15ff9d7bd765f7e078e9187c2
We were using mixed types for nonce fields. Protobuf
have storj.Nonce, metabase have []byte. This change
is a refactoring to have everywere its possible only
storj.Nonce.
Change-Id: Id54bd8481f30c721cdaf3df79206d25e7cfdab55
To optimize memory consumption we where consuming
segment data during processing results from delete
query. Turns out that there is a chance that query will be
rolled-back if something will go wrong while reading
results. In such case its possible to delete pices but
object/segment will be still in DB.
This change removed piece deletion from problematic
place. Pieces are still deleted in batches but are not
limited at the moment. To avoid memory issues object
deletion batch was decreased.
Change-Id: Icb3667220f9c25f64b73cf71d0cf3fdc7e5107c5
This change adds a NOT NULL constraint to the created_at column in the segment table.
All occurrences of CreatedAt as a pointer are changed to non pointer version (metabase, segment loop, etc)
Change-Id: I3efd476ebd1edd3327b69c9223d9edc800e1cc52
In case when number of deleted segments in a single
batch was multiplication of opts.DeletePiecesBatchSize it
was possible to finish deletion of objects to early.
Change-Id: I9181d4a3c64053d9df46a11a6e0cd22153c73ee9
It's possible that single object will have a lot of segments and
at the moment we are trying to collect all pieces at once and
send to storage nodes information about deletion. Such
approach my lead to using extensive amount of memory. This
change is handling this problem by calling DeletePieces
function multiple times with only part of pieces to delete for
a single call.
Change-Id: Ie1e66cd9d86d130eb89a61cf6e23f38b8cb8859e
metabase has become a central concept and it's more suitable for it to
be directly nested under satellite rather than being part of metainfo.
metainfo is going to be the "endpoint" logic for handling requests.
Change-Id: I53770d6761ac1e9a1283b5aa68f471b21e784198
