sched_ext is about to be merged upstream. There are some compatibility
breaking changes and we're making the current sched_ext/for-6.11
1edab907b57d ("sched_ext/scx_qmap: Pick idle CPU for direct dispatch on
!wakeup enqueues") the baseline.
Tag everything except scx_mitosis as 1.0.0. As scx_mitosis is still in early
development and is currently temporarily disabled, only the patchlevel is
bumped.
Sync to vmlinux.h from sched_ext/for-6.11 1edab907b57d ("sched_ext/scx_qmap:
Pick idle CPU for direct dispatch on !wakeup enqueues"). This most likely
will be the commit which will be merged during the upcoming kernel v6.11
merge window.
Unfortunately, this is a compatibility breaking change. As the size of
bpf_iter_scx_dsq is reduced, schedulers that use the iterator - scx_lavd and
scx_layered - won't be able to run on older kernels. Likewise, older
binaries from before this commit won't be able to run on newer kernels.
Sync from sched_ext/for-6.11 1edab907b57d ("sched_ext/scx_qmap: Pick idle
CPU for direct dispatch on !wakeup enqueues")
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext.git for-6.11
- cgroup support hasn't landed in the upstream kernel yet. This most likely
will happen in a few weeks. For the time being, disable scx_flatcg,
scx_pair and scx_mitosis.
- Compat macro for DSQ task iterator dropped. This is now a part of
the baseline.
- scx_bpf_consume() isn't upstream yet. BPF interfacing side is still being
discussed. Dropped example usage from tools/sched_ext. None of the
practical schedulers use it, so this should be fine for now.
- scx_bpf_cpu_rq() added.
- AUTOATTACH workaround for newer libbpf versions added.
Sync to the latest. Right now, it's in an awkward place where receiving
AUTOATTACH compat updatees from kernel breaks build as the libbpf version is
marked as 1.5 but bpf_map__set_autoattach() is not available yet. Sync to
the latest.
A task can become a runnable on any task's context not only its waker
task. Thus, we should not count wake-up on unrelated task's context.
With this commit, the scheduler can (much more) accurately detect
waker-wakee relationsships.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The prior approach using the sum of weights gives too much penalty to
nice tasks with large nice values. With this commit, the time slice is
determined by the number of runnable tasks regardless of nice priority.
Note that the fairness will still be enforced based on tasks' nice
priorities (weights).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
To easily distinguish, let's initialize the current logical clock to
zero (not the current physical time). Also, avoid the deadline
calculation being zero by adding +1 here and there.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The priority boost for interactive tasks can be exploited to render the
system nearly unresponsive by creating numerous tasks that constantly
switch between wait/wakeup states.
For example, stress tests like `hackbench -l 10000` can significantly
degrade system responsiveness.
To mitigate this, limit the number of interactive tasks added to the
priority queue to 4x the number of online CPUs.
This simple approach appears to be a quite effective at identifying
potential spam of "fake" interactive tasks, while still prioritizing
legitimate interactive tasks.
Additionally, periodically refresh the interactive status of the tasks
based on their most recent average of voluntary context switches,
preventing the interactive status from being too "sticky".
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Avoid dispatching per-CPU kthreads directly, since this may cause
interactivity problems or unfairness, for example if there are too many
softirqs being scheduled (e.g., in presence of high RX network traffic
or when running certain stress tests, like hackbench).
Moreover, in order to help with testing and benchmarks, introduce the
option --local-kthread, that allows to restore the old behavior if
enabled.
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
When updating the task vruntime, ensure the time slice delta is always a
positive value. Failing to do so may cause the global vruntime to
increase excessively due to overflows.
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Periodically report the amount of online CPUs to stdout.
The online CPUs are initially evaluated looking at the online cpumask,
then the value is updated in the .cpu_offline() / .cpu_online()
callbacks.
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Keep track of the CPUs that are running interactive tasks and report
their amount to stdout.
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
The correct default value of slice_ns 5ms, not 5s.
This change doesn't really make any difference in practice, since these
values are changed by the Rust part when the scheduler is started, but
it's good to keep this aligned to the proper values for consistency.
Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
This commit changes the use of a physical clock to a virtual, logical
clock in calculating deadlines.
- The virtual current clock advances upon a task's running to its
virtual deadline.
- When enqueuing a task, its virtual deadline from the virtual current
clock is calculated.
With the above two changes, this guarantees that there is no such task
whose virtual deadline is smaller than the virtual current clock. This
means any enqueuing task can compete with any other already enqueued
tasks. This allows a latency-critical task to be immediately scheduled
if needed.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Every time we need to dispatch a task re-evalate its time slice as:
(unused_time_slice + min_time_slice) / 2
This allows to refill the time slice for tasks that haven't used much of
their previously assigned time, improving fairness.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Make sure to always classify interactive tasks, even when the system is
not fully utilized. This ensures that if the system suddenly becomes
overloaded, we already know which tasks need to be dispatched to the
priority DSQ.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Fetch the value of "delta" directly from the returned value from
__sync_fetch_and_sub, as it returns the origin value of
cgc->cvtime_delta.
Additional fetching instruction of cgc->cvtime_delta would be redundant
here.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Tasks are consumed from various DSQs in the following order:
per-CPU DSQs => priority DSQ => shared DSQ
Tasks in the shared DSQ may be starved by those in the priority DSQ,
which in turn may be starved by tasks dispatched to any per-CPU DSQ.
To mitigate this, record the timestamp of the last task scheduling event
both from the priority DSQ and the shared DSQ.
If the starvation threshold is exceeded without consuming a task, the
scheduler will be forced to consume a task from the corresponding DSQ.
The starvation threshold can be adjusted using the --starvation-thresh
command line parameter (default is 5ms).
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
There is no need to RCU protect the cpumask for the offline CPUs: it is
created once when the scheduler is initialized and it's never
deallocated.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Reduce the default time slice down to 5ms for a faster reaction and
system responsiveness when the system is overcomissioned.
This also helps to provide a more predictable level of performance.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Always use direct CPU dispatch for kthreads, there is no need to treat
kthreads in a special way, simply reuse direct CPU dispatch to
prioritize them.
Moreover, change direct CPU dispatches to use scx_bpf_dispatch_vtime(),
since we may dispatch multiple tasks to the same per-CPU DSQ now.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
