LAVD_VDL_LOOSENESS_FT represents how loose the deadline is. The smaller
value means the deadline is tighter. While it is unlikely to be tuned,
let's keep it as a tunable for now.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
That is okay since the runtime is considered in calculating a virtual
deadline. A shorter runtime will result in a tighter deadline linearly.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
If inheriting the parent's properties, a new fork task tends to be too
prioritized. That is, many parent processes, such as `make,` are a bit
more latency-critical than average.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Advancing the clock slower when overloaded gives more opportunities for
latency-critical tasks to cut in the run queue. Controlling the clock
better reflects the actual load than the prior approach of stretching
the time-space when overloaded.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
We now maintain two run queues—an eligible run queue (DSQ) and an
ineligible run queue (rbtree)—sorted by the task's virtual deadline.
When the eligible run queue is empty, or the ineligible run queue has
not been consumed for too long (e.g., 15 msec), a task in the ineligible
run queue is moved to the eligible run queue for execution. With these
two queues, we have a better admission control.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Update libbpf-rs & libbpf-cargo to 0.24. Among other things, generated
skeletons now contain directly accessible map and program objects, no
longer necessitating the use of accessor methods. As a result, the risk
for mutability conflicts is reduced greatly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Estimating the service time from run time and frequency is not
incorrect. However, it reacts slowly to sudden changes since it relies
on the moving average. Hence, we directly measure the service time to
enforce fairness.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
sched_ext is about to be merged upstream. There are some compatibility
breaking changes and we're making the current sched_ext/for-6.11
1edab907b57d ("sched_ext/scx_qmap: Pick idle CPU for direct dispatch on
!wakeup enqueues") the baseline.
Tag everything except scx_mitosis as 1.0.0. As scx_mitosis is still in early
development and is currently temporarily disabled, only the patchlevel is
bumped.
Sync from sched_ext/for-6.11 1edab907b57d ("sched_ext/scx_qmap: Pick idle
CPU for direct dispatch on !wakeup enqueues")
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/sched_ext.git for-6.11
- cgroup support hasn't landed in the upstream kernel yet. This most likely
will happen in a few weeks. For the time being, disable scx_flatcg,
scx_pair and scx_mitosis.
- Compat macro for DSQ task iterator dropped. This is now a part of
the baseline.
- scx_bpf_consume() isn't upstream yet. BPF interfacing side is still being
discussed. Dropped example usage from tools/sched_ext. None of the
practical schedulers use it, so this should be fine for now.
- scx_bpf_cpu_rq() added.
- AUTOATTACH workaround for newer libbpf versions added.
A task can become a runnable on any task's context not only its waker
task. Thus, we should not count wake-up on unrelated task's context.
With this commit, the scheduler can (much more) accurately detect
waker-wakee relationsships.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The prior approach using the sum of weights gives too much penalty to
nice tasks with large nice values. With this commit, the time slice is
determined by the number of runnable tasks regardless of nice priority.
Note that the fairness will still be enforced based on tasks' nice
priorities (weights).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
To easily distinguish, let's initialize the current logical clock to
zero (not the current physical time). Also, avoid the deadline
calculation being zero by adding +1 here and there.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
This commit changes the use of a physical clock to a virtual, logical
clock in calculating deadlines.
- The virtual current clock advances upon a task's running to its
virtual deadline.
- When enqueuing a task, its virtual deadline from the virtual current
clock is calculated.
With the above two changes, this guarantees that there is no such task
whose virtual deadline is smaller than the virtual current clock. This
means any enqueuing task can compete with any other already enqueued
tasks. This allows a latency-critical task to be immediately scheduled
if needed.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
With commit 5d20f89a ("scheds-rust: build rust schedulers in sequence"),
schedulers are now built serially one after the other to prevent meson
and cargo from forking NxN parallel tasks.
However, this change has made building a single scheduler much more
cumbersome, due to the chain of dependencies.
For example, building scx_rusty using the specific meson target would
still result in all schedulers being built, because they all depend on
each other.
To address this issue, introduce the new meson build option
`serialize=true|false` (default is false).
This option allows to disable the schedulers' build chain, restoring the
old behavior.
With this option enabled, it is now possible to build just a single
scheduler, parallelizing the cargo build properly, without triggering
the build of the others. Example:
$ meson setup build -Dbuildtype=release -Dserialize=false
$ meson compile -C build scx_rusty
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
The competition window was 7.5 msec, half of the targeted latency.
However, it is too wide for some workloads, so unrelated tasks may
compete with each other. Hence, it is tightened to about 1 msec with
LAVD_LAT_WEIGHT_SHIFT to avoid unnecessary competition.
Also, when a system is overloaded, now the time space is stretched more
aggressively (i.e., lat_prio^2) when a task's latency priority is low
(high value).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The old approach was too conservative in running a new task, so when a
fork-heavy workload competes with a CPU-bound workload, the fork-heavy
one is starved. The new approach solves the starvation problem by
inheriting parent's statistics. It seems a good (at least better than
old) guess how a new task will behave.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
When the system is highly loaded with compute-intensive tasks, the old
setting chokes latensive-intensive tasks, so loosen the dealine when the
system is overloaded (> 100% utilization).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
When the lavd is loaded, it prints out its build id. It helps to easily
identify what version it is when testing.
```
01:56:54 [INFO] scx_lavd scheduler is initialized (build ID: 0.8.1-g98a5fa8595430414115c504857cea1a458393838-dirty x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
```
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
This is a second attempt to optimize tunables for a wider range of
games.
1) LAVD_BOOST_RANGE increased from 14 (35%) to 40 (100% of nice range).
Now the latency priority (biased by nice value) will decide which
task should run first . The nice value will decide the time slice.
2) The first change will give higher priority to latency-critical task
compared to before. For compensation, the slice boost also increased
(2x -> 3x).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
In some games (e.g., Elden Ring), it was observed that preemption
happens much less frequently. The reason is that tasks' runtime per
schedule is similar, so it does not meet the existing criteria. To
alleviate the problem, the following three tunables are revised:
1) Smaller LAVD_PREEMPT_KICK_MARGIN and LAVD_PREEMPT_TICK_MARGIN help to
trigger more preemption.
2) Smaller LAVD_SLICE_MAX_NS works better especially 250 or 300Hz
kernels.
3) Longer LAVD_ELIGIBLE_TIME_MAX purturbes time lines less frequently.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Use the function can_task1_kick_task2() to replace places which also
checking the comp_preemption_info between two cpus for better
consistency.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
It seems that we are not updating `is_idle` when we find an idle CPU
with pick_cpu(), causing unnecessary rescheduling events when
select_cpu() is called.
To resolve this, ensure that the is_idle state is correctly set.
Additionally, always ensure that the task is dispatched to the local DSQ
immediately upon finding (and reserving) an idle CPU.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
- clean up u63 and u32 usages in structures to reduce struct size
- refactoring pick_cpu() for readability
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The required CPU performance (cpuperf) was set to 1024 (100%) when the
CPU utilization was 100%. When a sudden load spike happens, it makes the
system adapt slowly in the next interval.
The new scheme always reserves some headroom in advance, so it sets
cpuperf to 1024 when the CPU utilization reaches to 85%. This gives some
room to adapt in advance.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
In preparation of upstreaming, let's set the min version requirement at the
released v6.9 kernels. Drop __COMPAT_SCX_KICK_IDLE. The open helper macros
now check the existence of SCX_KICK_IDLE and abort if not.
In preparation of upstreaming, let's set the min version requirement at the
released v6.9 kernels. Drop __COMPAT_scx_bpf_switch_call(). The open helper
macros now check the existence of SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL and abort if not.
The bpf_ prefix is used for BPF API. Rename bpf_log2() to u32_log2() and
bpf_log2l() to u64_log2(). While at it, relocate them below compiler
directive helpers.
The old logic for CPU frequency scaling is that the task's CPU
performance target (i.e., target CPU frequency) is checked every tick
interval and updated immediately. Indeed, it samples and updates a
performance target every tick interval. Ultimately, it fluctuates CPU
frequency every tick interval, resulting in less steady performance.
Now, we take a different strategy. The key idea is to increase the
frequency as soon as possible when a task starts running for quick
adoption to load spikes. However, if necessary, it decreases gradually
every tick interval to avoid frequency fluctuations.
In my testing, it shows more stable performance in many workloads
(games, compilation).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Originally, do_update_sys_stat() simply calculated the system-wide CPU
utilization. Over time, it has evolved to collect all kinds of
system-wide, periodic statistics for decision-making, so it has become
bulky. Now, it is time to refactor it for readability. This commit does
not contain functional changes other than refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The periodic CPU utilization routine does a lot of other work now. So we
rename LAVD_CPU_UTIL_INTERVAL_NS to LAVD_SYS_STAT_INTERVAL_NS.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
When a device is suspended and resumed, the suspended duration is added
up to a task's runtime if the task was running on the CPU. After the
resume, the task's runtime is incorrectly long and the scheduler starts
to recognize the system is under heavy load. To avoid such problem, the
suspended duration is measured and substracted from the task's runtime.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
scx_lavd: core compaction for low power consumption
When system-wide CPU utilization is low, it is very likely all the CPUs
are running with very low utilization. That means all CPUs run with low
clock frequency thanks to dynamic frequency scaling and very frequently
go in and out from/to C-state. That results in low performance (i.e.,
low clock frequency) and high power consumption (i.e., frequent
P-/C-state transition).
The idea of *core compaction* is using less number of CPUs when
system-wide CPU utilization is low. The chosen cores (called "active
cores") will run in higher utilization and higher clock frequency, and
the rest of the cores (called "idle cores") will be in a C-state for a
much longer duration. Thus, the core compaction can achieve higher
performance with lower power consumption.
One potential problem of core compaction is latency spikes when all the
active cores are overloaded. A few techniques are incorporated to solve
this problem.
1) Limit the active CPU core's utilization below a certain limit (say 50%).
2) Do not use the core compaction when the system-wide utilization is
moderate (say 50%).
3) Do not enforce the core compaction for kernel and pinned user-space
tasks since they are manually optimized for performance.
In my experiments, under a wide range of system-wide CPU utilization
(5%—80%), the core compaction reduces 7-30% power consumption without
sacrificing average and 99p tail latency.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Make restart handling with user_exit_info simpler and consistently use the
load and report macros consistently across the rust schedulers. This makes
all schedulers automatically handle auto restarts from CPU hotplug events.
Note that this is necessary even for scx_lavd which has CPU hotplug
operations as CPU hotplug operations which took place between skel open and
scheduler init can still trigger restart.
In order to prevent compiler from merging or refetching load/store
operations or unwanted reordering, we take the implemetation of
READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() from kernel sources under
"/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h".
Use WRITE_ONCE() in function flip_sys_cpu_util() to ensure the compiler
doesn't perform unnecessary optimization so the compiler won't make
incorrect assumptions when performing the operation of modifying of bit
flipping.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
Use the GNU built-in __sync_fetch_and_xor() to perform the XOR operation
on global variable "__sys_cpu_util_idx" to ensure the operations
visibility.
The built-in function "__sync_fetch_and_xor()" can provide both atomic
operation and full memory barrier which is needed by every operation
(especially store operation) on global variables.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>
C SCX_OPS_ATTACH() and rust scx_ops_attach() macros were not calling
.attach() and were only attaching the struct_ops. This meant that all
non-struct_ops BPF programs contained in the skels were never attached which
breaks e.g. scx_layered.
Let's fix it by adding .attach() invocation the the attach macros.
Originally the implementation of function rsigmoid_u64 will
perform substraction even when the value of "v" equals to the value
of "max" , in which the result is certainly zero.
We can avoid this redundant substration by changing the condition from
">" to ">=" since we know when the value of "v" and "max" are equal
we can return 0 without any substract operation.
If there is a higher priority task when running ops.tick(),
ops.select_cpu(), and ops.enqueue() callbacks, the current running tasks
yields its CPU by shrinking time slice to zero and a higher priority
task can run on the current CPU.
As low-cost, fine-grained preemption becomes available, default
parameters are adjusted as follows:
- Raise the bar for remote CPU preemption to avoid IPIs.
- Increase the maximum time slice.
- Gradually enforce the fair use of CPU time (i.e., ineligible duration)
Lastly, using CAS, we ensure that a remote CPU is preempted by only one
CPU. This removes unnecessary remote preemptions (and IPIs).
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
scx_lavd implemented 32 and 64 bit versions of a base-2 logarithm
function. This is now also used in rusty. To avoid code duplication,
let's pull it into a shared header.
Note that there is technically a functional change here as we remove the
always inline compiler directive. We instead assume that the compiler
will know best whether or not to inline the function.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To know the required CPU performance (e.g., frequency) demand, we keep
track of 1) utilization of each CPU and 2) _performance criticality_ of
each task. The performance criticality of a task denotes how critical it
is to CPU performance (frequency). Like the notion of latency
criticality, we use three factors: the task's average runtime, wake-up
frequency, and waken-up frequency. A task's runtime is longer, and its
two frequencies are higher; the task is more performance-critical
because it would be a bottleneck in the middle of the task chain.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The current code replenishes the task's time slice whenever the task
becomes ops.running(). However, there is a case where such behavior can
starve the other tasks, causing the watchdog timeout error. One (if not
all) such case is when a task is preempted while running by the higher
scheduler class (e.g., RT, DL). In such a case, the task will be transit
in a cycle of ops.running() -> ops.stopping() -> ops.running() -> etc.
Whenever it becomes re-running, it will be placed at the head of local
DSQ and ops.running() will renew its time slice. Hence, in the worst
case, the task can run forever since its time slice is never exhausted.
The fix is assigning the time slice only once by checking if the time
slice is calculated before.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
In Rust c_char can be aliased to i8 or u8, depending on the particular
target architecture.
For example, trying to build scx_lavd on ppc64 triggers the following
error:
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:200:38
|
200 | let c_tx_cm: *const c_char = (&tx.comm as *const [i8; 17]) as *const i8;
| ------------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `*const u8`, found `*const i8`
| |
| expected due to this
|
= note: expected raw pointer `*const u8`
found raw pointer `*const i8`
To fix this, consistently use c_char instead of assuming it corresponds
to i8.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
In _some_ kernel versions, loading scx_lavd fails with an error of
"bpf_rcu_read_unlock is missing". The usage of
bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in proc_dump_all_tasks() is correct but the
bpf verifier still think bpf_rcu_read_unlock() is missing. The most
plausible reason so far is that the problematic kernel does not have a
commit 6fceea0fa59f ("bpf: Transfer RCU lock state between subprog
calls"), failing inter-procedural analysis between proc_dump_all_tasks()
and submit_task_ctx(). Thus, we force inline submit_task_ctx() (no
inter-procedural analysis by the verifier is necessary) for the time
being.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
* scx-lavd: preemption of a lower-priority task using kick cpu
When a task is enqueued to the global queue, the scheduler checks if
there is a lower priority task than the enqueued task. If so, it kicks
out the lower-priority task, hoping the newly enqueued task or another
higher-priority task runs on the kicked CPU. Kicking another CPU is
expensive as an IPI is involved, so the scheduler judiciously kicks the
CPU when its benefit (i.e., priority gap) is clear enough.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Change the upper bound of ineligible duration (LAVD_ELIGIBLE_TIME_MAX).
The updated (2x increased) upper bound reflects the distribution of
tasks' eligible_delta_ns better.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Change the calculation of the run_frequence using the wait_period from
the last time the task yielded CPU to this time when the task is
running. The old implementation measures the time interval between the
last stopping and the current running and increases run_freq without
reason.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Change the last_{start/stop/wait/wake}_clk in task_ctx to
last_{running/stopping/quiescent/runnable}_clk, matching with state
transition names. In addition, add comments and reorder fields in
task_ctx for readability.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
When a task runs more than once (running <->stopping) within one
runnable-quiescent transition, accumulate runtime of multiple runnings
for statistics. This helps to get the task's runtime per schedule when
supposing that a huge time slice is given, which is what we want to
collect for scheduling decisions.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Remove runtime_boost using slice_boost_prio. Without slice_boost_prio,
the scheduler collects the exact time slice.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Let's change the function names of update_stat_for_*() as follow their
callers for consistency and less confusion.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
The run_time_boosted_ns calculation requires updated slice_boost_prio,
so updating slice_boost_prio should be done before updating
run_time_boosted_ns.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
transit_task_stat() is now tracking the same runnable, running, stopping,
quiescent transitions that sched_ext core already tracks and always returns
%true. Let's remove it.
LAVD_TASK_STAT_ENQ is tracking a subset of runnable task state transitions -
the ones which end up calling ops.enqueue(). However, what it is trying to
track is a task becoming runnable so that its load can be added to the cpu's
load sum.
Move the LAVD_TASK_STAT_ENQ state transition and update_stat_for_enq()
invocation to ops.runnable() which is called for all runnable transitions.
Note that when all the methods are invoked, the invocation order would be
ops.select_cpu(), runnable() and then enqueue(). So, this change moves
update_stat_for_enq() invocation before calc_when_to_run() for
put_global_rq(). update_stat_for_enq() updates taskc->load_actual which is
consumed by calc_greedy_ratio() and thus affects calc_when_to_run().
Before this patch, calc_greedy_ratio() would use load_actual which doesn't
reflect the last running period. After this patch, the latest running period
will be reflected when the task gets queued to the global queue.
The difference is unlikely to matter but it'd probably make sense to make it
more consistent (e.g. do it at the end of quiescent transition).
After this change, transit_task_stat() doesn't detect any invalid
transitions.
scx_lavd tracks task state transitions and updates statistics on each valid
transition. However, there's an asymmetry between the runnable/running and
stopping/quiescent transitions. In the former, the runnable and running
transitions are accounted separately in update_stat_for_enq() and
update_stat_for_run(), respectively. However, in the latter, the two
transitions are combined together in update_stat_for_stop().
This asymmetry leads to incorrect accounting. For example, a task's load
should be added to the cpu's load sum when the task gets enqueued and
subtracted when the task is no longer runnable (quiescent). The former is
accounted correctly from update_stat_for_enq() but the latter is done
whenever the task stops. A task can transit between running and stopping
multiple times before becoming quiescent, so the asymmetry can end up
subtracting the load of a task which is still running from the cpu's load
sum.
This patch:
- introduces LAVD_TASK_STAT_QUIESCENT and updates transit_task_stat() so
that it can handle all valid state transitions including the multiple back
and forth transitions between two pairs - QUIESCENT <-> ENQ and RUNNING
<-> STOPPING.
- restores the symmetry by moving load adjustments part from
update_stat_for_stop() to new update_stat_for_quiescent().
This removes a good chunk of ignored transitions. The next patch will take
care of the rest.
The old approach is mapping [0, maximum latency criticliy] to [-boost
range, boost range). This approach is easily affected by one outlier
maximum value and suffers from the integer truncation error. The new
approach divides the range into two -- [minimum latency criticality,
average latency criticality) and [average latency criticality, maximum
latency criticality] -- and maps them into [boost range/2, 0) and [0,
-boost range/2), respectively,
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Replace a latency weight arrary to more skewed one, which is the
inverse of sched_prio_to_slice_weight. It turns out more skewed one
works better under highly CPU-overloaded cases since it gives a longer
deadline to non-latency-critical tasks.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
As the calculated runtime increases by considering the number of
full-time slice consumption, increase the upper bound
(LAVD_LC_RUNTIME_MAX) of runtime to be considered in latency
calculation. Also, add LAVD_SLICE_BOOST_MAX_PRIO to avoid
slice_boost_prio dropping to zero suddenly.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Take slice_boost_prio -- how many times a full time slice was consumed
-- into consideration in calculating run_time_ns (runtime per schedule).
This improve the accuracy especially when a task is overscheduled and
its time slice is reduced for enforcing fairness.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Returning prev_cpu after picking an idle CPU will cause the idle CPU
stall because the idle core was already punched out from the idle mask
by the scx core so it is no longer idle from the scx core's point of
view.
This fix conducts the idle core selection at the last step so it never
return prev_cpu after picking the idle core.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
get_task_ctx() and try_get_task_ctx() were added for common error
handling for task lookup failure. Since idle "swapper" task is not under
sched_ext, try_get_task_ctx() is added for the case such that idle task
can be searched.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
We don't need to test SCX_WAKE_SYNC because SCX_WAKE_SYNC should only be
set when SCX_WAKE_TTWU is set.
Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
scx_lavd is a BPF scheduler that implements an LAVD (Latency-criticality
Aware Virtual Deadline) scheduling algorithm. While LAVD is new and
still evolving, its core ideas are 1) measuring how much a task is
latency critical and 2) leveraging the task's latency-criticality
information in making various scheduling decisions (e.g., task's
deadline, time slice, etc.). As the name implies, LAVD is based on the
foundation of deadline scheduling. This scheduler consists of the BPF
part and the rust part. The BPF part makes all the scheduling decisions;
the rust part loads the BPF code and conducts other chores (e.g.,
printing sampled scheduling decisions).
