[info] type_name = "std::set" stub_template_params = [1,2] ctype = "SET_TYPE" header = "set" # Old: typeName = "std::set<" ns = ["namespace std"] numTemplateParams = 1 replaceTemplateParamIndex = [1] allocatorIndex = 2 [codegen] decl = """ template void getSizeType(const %1% &container, size_t& returnArg); """ func = """ template void getSizeType(const %1% &container, size_t& returnArg) { constexpr size_t nodeSize = sizeof(typename %1%::node_type); size_t numElems = container.size(); SAVE_SIZE(sizeof(%1%) + (nodeSize * numElems)); SAVE_DATA((uintptr_t)nodeSize); SAVE_DATA((uintptr_t)numElems); // The double ampersand is needed otherwise this loop doesn't work with vector for (auto&& it: container) { getSizeType(it, returnArg); } } """ traversal_func = """ auto tail = returnArg.write((uintptr_t)&container) .write(container.size()); // The double ampersand is needed otherwise this loop doesn't work with // vector for (auto&& it : container) { tail = tail.delegate([&it](auto ret) { return OIInternal::getSizeType(it, ret); }); } return tail.finish(); """ [[codegen.processor]] type = "types::st::VarInt" func = """ el.pointer = std::get(d.val).value; """ [[codegen.processor]] type = "types::st::List::type>" func = """ #ifdef __GLIBCXX__ /* We don't have access to the _Rb_tree_node struct, so we manually re-create it * to get the effective size of a set entry. Is there a better way to do this? * * https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen/a00716_source.html#l00216 * From the source of , an _Rb_tree_node has the following members: */ struct OI_Rb_tree_node { using _Rb_tree_color = int; // enum using _Base_ptr = std::nullptr_t; // pointer _Rb_tree_color _M_color; // from parent _Rb_tree_node_base _Base_ptr _M_parent; // from parent _Rb_tree_node_base _Base_ptr _M_left; // from parent _Rb_tree_node_base _Base_ptr _M_right; // from parent _Rb_tree_node_base T0 _M_value; }; static constexpr size_t element_size = sizeof(OI_Rb_tree_node); #elif _LIBCPP_VERSION static_assert(false && "libc++ is currently not supported"); /* We don't have access to the __tree_node struct, so we manually re-create it * to get the effective size of a set entry. Is there a better way to do this? * * https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/1b10920164695a487669405223f8bbe93799430c/libcxx/include/__tree#L729-L781 * From the source of <__tree>, a __tree_node has the following members: */ struct OI__tree_node { using pointer = std::nullptr_t; // pointer using __parent_pointer = std::nullptr_t; // pointer pointer __left_; // from parent __tree_end_node pointer __right_; // from parent __tree_node_base __parent_pointer __parent_; // from parent __tree_node_base bool __is_black_; // from parent __tree_node_base T0 __value_; }; static constexpr size_t element_size = sizeof(OI__tree_node); #else static_assert(false && "No known element_size for sets. See types/set_type.toml"); #endif static constexpr auto childField = make_field("[]"); auto list = std::get(d.val); el.container_stats.emplace(result::Element::ContainerStats { .capacity = list.length, .length = list.length, }); el.exclusive_size += el.container_stats->length * (element_size - sizeof(T0)); for (size_t i = 0; i < list.length; i++) stack_ins(childField); """