Go to file
aszlig dcf40f7c24
Merge pull request #57519 (systemd-confinement)
Currently if you want to properly chroot a systemd service, you could do
it using BindReadOnlyPaths=/nix/store or use a separate derivation which
gathers the runtime closure of the service you want to chroot. The
former is the easier method and there is also a method directly offered
by systemd, called ProtectSystem, which still leaves the whole store
accessible. The latter however is a bit more involved, because you need
to bind-mount each store path of the runtime closure of the service you
want to chroot.

This can be achieved using pkgs.closureInfo and a small derivation that
packs everything into a systemd unit, which later can be added to
systemd.packages.

However, this process is a bit tedious, so the changes here implement
this in a more generic way.

Now if you want to chroot a systemd service, all you need to do is:

  {
    systemd.services.myservice = {
      description = "My Shiny Service";
      wantedBy = [ "multi-user.target" ];

      confinement.enable = true;
      serviceConfig.ExecStart = "${pkgs.myservice}/bin/myservice";
    };
  }

If more than the dependencies for the ExecStart* and ExecStop* (which
btw. also includes script and {pre,post}Start) need to be in the chroot,
it can be specified using the confinement.packages option. By default
(which uses the full-apivfs confinement mode), a user namespace is set
up as well and /proc, /sys and /dev are mounted appropriately.

In addition - and by default - a /bin/sh executable is provided, which
is useful for most programs that use the system() C library call to
execute commands via shell.

Unfortunately, there are a few limitations at the moment. The first
being that DynamicUser doesn't work in conjunction with tmpfs, because
systemd seems to ignore the TemporaryFileSystem option if DynamicUser is
enabled. I started implementing a workaround to do this, but I decided
to not include it as part of this pull request, because it needs a lot
more testing to ensure it's consistent with the behaviour without
DynamicUser.

The second limitation/issue is that RootDirectoryStartOnly doesn't work
right now, because it only affects the RootDirectory option and doesn't
include/exclude the individual bind mounts or the tmpfs.

A quirk we do have right now is that systemd tries to create a /usr
directory within the chroot, which subsequently fails. Fortunately, this
is just an ugly error and not a hard failure.

The changes also come with a changelog entry for NixOS 19.03, which is
why I asked for a vote of the NixOS 19.03 stable maintainers whether to
include it (I admit it's a bit late a few days before official release,
sorry for that):

  @samueldr:

    Via pull request comment[1]:

      +1 for backporting as this only enhances the feature set of nixos,
      and does not (at a glance) change existing behaviours.

    Via IRC:

      new feature: -1, tests +1, we're at zero, self-contained, with no
      global effects without actively using it, +1, I think it's good

  @lheckemann:

    Via pull request comment[2]:

      I'm neutral on backporting. On the one hand, as @samueldr says,
      this doesn't change any existing functionality. On the other hand,
      it's a new feature and we're well past the feature freeze, which
      AFAIU is intended so that new, potentially buggy features aren't
      introduced in the "stabilisation period". It is a cool feature
      though? :)

A few other people on IRC didn't have opposition either against late
inclusion into NixOS 19.03:

  @edolstra:  "I'm not against it"
  @Infinisil: "+1 from me as well"
  @grahamc:   "IMO its up to the RMs"

So that makes +1 from @samueldr, 0 from @lheckemann, 0 from @edolstra
and +1 from @Infinisil (even though he's not a release manager) and no
opposition from anyone, which is the reason why I'm merging this right
now.

I also would like to thank @Infinisil, @edolstra and @danbst for their
reviews.

[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/57519#issuecomment-477322127
[2]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/57519#issuecomment-477548395
2019-03-29 04:37:53 +01:00
.github doc/reviewing-contributions: nix-review instead of nox-review 2019-03-20 11:28:00 +00:00
doc dockerTools: add finalImageName parameter for pullImage 2019-03-26 19:35:14 +01:00
lib Doc fix: use correct function name in type signature for concatIMapStringsSep 2019-03-18 12:14:39 +00:00
maintainers fetch-kde-qt.sh: get hashes from metadata 2019-03-27 22:16:18 -04:00
nixos Merge pull request #57519 (systemd-confinement) 2019-03-29 04:37:53 +01:00
pkgs Merge pull request #58503 from geistesk/stellarium-v0.19.0 2019-03-29 03:52:02 +01:00
.editorconfig Revert ".version: remove final newline" 2018-04-28 14:23:13 +02:00
.gitattributes gitattributes: disable merge=union in all-packages 2018-03-27 11:03:03 -05:00
.gitignore Replace androidenv by new implementation 2018-12-18 21:16:06 +01:00
.version 19.09 is Loris. 2019-02-25 23:21:14 +01:00
COPYING COPYING: include 2019 2019-03-18 19:55:33 -07:00
default.nix Fix local path to release notes in error message 2018-10-08 05:43:15 -05:00
README.md doc/reviewing-contributions: pull-requests -> pull requests 2018-11-19 13:03:23 -06:00

logo

Code Triagers Badge

Nixpkgs is a collection of packages for the Nix package manager. It is periodically built and tested by the Hydra build daemon as so-called channels. To get channel information via git, add nixpkgs-channels as a remote:

% git remote add channels https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs-channels.git

For stability and maximum binary package support, it is recommended to maintain custom changes on top of one of the channels, e.g. nixos-18.09 for the latest release and nixos-unstable for the latest successful build of master:

% git remote update channels
% git rebase channels/nixos-18.09

For pull requests, please rebase onto nixpkgs master.

NixOS Linux distribution source code is located inside nixos/ folder.

Communication:

Note: MIT license does not apply to the packages built by Nixpkgs, merely to the package descriptions (Nix expressions, build scripts, and so on). It also might not apply to patches included in Nixpkgs, which may be derivative works of the packages to which they apply. The aforementioned artifacts are all covered by the licenses of the respective packages.