af8f08d638
The patch is no longer needed, as we are now using the BPF seccomp sandbox. Unfortunately this is not marked "adequately sandboxed" in chrome://sandbox, as it awaits security review on http://crbug.com/26528. Unfortunately this gets us into a position where we can't be sure if the sandbox is working correctly, especially because the non-BPF seccomp sandbox has a bunch of stability issues and is marked legacy. And we definitely don't want to add support for the setuid sandbox, do we? Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
arora | ||
chromium | ||
conkeror | ||
elinks | ||
firefox | ||
icecat-3 | ||
konq-plugins | ||
links | ||
links2 | ||
lynx | ||
midori | ||
mozilla | ||
mozilla-plugins | ||
netsurf | ||
opera | ||
rekonq | ||
uzbl | ||
vimprobable2 | ||
w3m |