nixpkgs/pkgs/development/libraries/gettext/no-gets.patch
Eelco Dolstra fcc18aad0a Fix some packages that referred to gets()
Glibc no longer defines gets() if _GNU_SOURCE is defined.
2012-09-18 14:05:23 -04:00

43 lines
1.5 KiB
Diff

hack until gzip pulls a newer gnulib version
From 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:41 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] stdio: don't assume gets any more
Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11
and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning
any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous
interface.
--- a/gettext-tools/libgettextpo/stdio.in.h
+++ b/gettext-tools/libgettextpo/stdio.in.h
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@
so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is
always declared, since it is required by C89. */
#undef gets
-_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
#if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
# if @REPLACE_FOPEN@
--- a/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib/stdio.in.h
+++ b/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib/stdio.in.h
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@
so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is
always declared, since it is required by C89. */
#undef gets
-_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
#if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
# if @REPLACE_FOPEN@
--- a/gettext-runtime/gnulib-lib/stdio.in.h
+++ b/gettext-runtime/gnulib-lib/stdio.in.h
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@
so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is
always declared, since it is required by C89. */
#undef gets
-_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
#if @GNULIB_FOPEN@
# if @REPLACE_FOPEN@