JakeHillion/nixpkgs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
63acfd5685
nixpkgs/pkgs/development/compilers/julia
History
Pontus Stenetorp c43789e7bb
julia_16-bin: 1.6.2 -> 1.6.3 
Patches: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/compare/v1.6.2...v1.6.3

Dropping `chown` test workaround patch as it is now fixed upstream:

    3e8eb9e8de
2021-09-26 14:32:29 +00:00
..
patches julia_16-bin: 1.6.2 -> 1.6.3 2021-09-26 14:32:29 +00:00
1.0-bin.nix julia: mark julia_10-bin as insecure 2021-05-18 07:37:24 +00:00
1.0.nix julia: move patches into separate directories 2021-04-28 06:55:52 +00:00
1.5.nix julia_15: add comment clarifying broken-ness 2021-05-18 01:01:34 -07:00
1.6-bin.nix julia_16-bin: 1.6.2 -> 1.6.3 2021-09-26 14:32:29 +00:00
README.md julia: add README 2021-04-28 06:55:53 +00:00

README.md

Julia

Julia, as a full-fledged programming language with an extensive standard library that covers numerical computing, can be somewhat challenging to package. This file aims to provide pointers which could not easily be included as comments in the expressions themselves.

For Nixpkgs, the manual is as always your primary reference, and for the Julia side of things you probably want to familiarise yourself with the README , build instructions, and release process. Remember that these can change between Julia releases, especially if the LTS and release branches have deviated greatly. A lot of the build process is underdocumented and thus there is no substitute for digging into the code that controls the build process. You are very likely to need to use the test suite to locate and address issues and in the end passing it, while only disabling a minimal set of broken or incompatible tests you think you have a good reason to disable, is your best bet at arriving at a solid derivation.