38771badd3
If a package's meta has `knownVulnerabilities`, like so: stdenv.mkDerivation { name = "foobar-1.2.3"; ... meta.knownVulnerabilities = [ "CVE-0000-00000: remote code execution" "CVE-0000-00001: local privilege escalation" ]; } and a user attempts to install the package, they will be greeted with a warning indicating that maybe they don't want to install it: error: Package ‘foobar-1.2.3’ in ‘...default.nix:20’ is marked as insecure, refusing to evaluate. Known issues: - CVE-0000-00000: remote code execution - CVE-0000-00001: local privilege escalation You can install it anyway by whitelisting this package, using the following methods: a) for `nixos-rebuild` you can add ‘foobar-1.2.3’ to `nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages` in the configuration.nix, like so: { nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages = [ "foobar-1.2.3" ]; } b) For `nix-env`, `nix-build`, `nix-shell` or any other Nix command you can add ‘foobar-1.2.3’ to `permittedInsecurePackages` in ~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix, like so: { permittedInsecurePackages = [ "foobar-1.2.3" ]; } Adding either of these configurations will permit this specific version to be installed. A third option also exists: NIXPKGS_ALLOW_INSECURE=1 nix-build ... though I specifically avoided having a global file-based toggle to disable this check. This way, users don't disable it once in order to get a single package, and then don't realize future packages are insecure. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
cross | ||
custom | ||
cygwin | ||
darwin | ||
freebsd | ||
generic | ||
linux | ||
native | ||
nix | ||
adapters.nix | ||
booter.nix | ||
common-path.nix | ||
default.nix |