Accidentally broken by 4fede53c09
("nixos manuals: bring back package references").
Without this fix, grafana won't start:
$ systemctl status grafana
...
systemd[1]: Starting Grafana Service Daemon...
systemd[1]: Started Grafana Service Daemon.
grafana[666]: 2016/03/06 19:57:32 [log.go:75 Fatal()] [E] Failed to detect generated css or javascript files in static root (%!s(MISSING)), have you executed default grunt task?
systemd[1]: grafana.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
systemd[1]: grafana.service: Unit entered failed state.
systemd[1]: grafana.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Broken by 17389e256f.
The description attributes of mkOption are parsed by XSLT, so we can
create a DocBook manual out of it.
Unfortunately, the passwordHash option had a description which includes
a <password> placeholder which is recognized by DocBook XSL as a valid
start tag. So as there is obviously no </password>, the build of the
manual bailed out with a parsing error.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Reported-by: devhell <"^"@regexmail.net>
Since we don't restart sysinit.service in switch-to-configuration, this
additionally overrides systemd-binfmt.service to depend on
proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc.automount, which is normally provided by
sysinit.service.
In NixOS/nixpkgs@da6bc44 @thoughtpolice
made the Transmission NixOS module override the umask setting in the
Transmission config. This commit removes that override.
I want a different umask setting and I guess it is possible that other
people might want it to. Thus I think it is a good idea to respect the
umask settings in the Transmission config.
Add ability to do a more traditional bspwm startup (using the bspwm-session
script provided by nixpkgs.bspwm) as an alternative to directly starting
sxhkd & bspwm
Also added the ability to specify a custom startup script, instead of
relying on the provided bspwm-session
This splits a few NixOS tests (namely Chromium, VirtualBox and the
networking tests) into several subtests that are exposed via attributes.
The networking tests were already split up but they didn't expose an
attribute set of available tests but used a function attribute to
specify the resulting test instead.
A new function callSubTests in nixos/release.nix is now responsible for
gathering subtests, which is also used for the installer and boot tests.
The latter is now placed in a tests.boot.* namespace rather than
"polluting" the tests attribute set with its subtest.
As @bobvanderlinden suggests in #13585:
"Looks like that cleans things up quite a bit! Just one aesthetics note,
the boot tests could now be renamed from boot.bootBiosCdrom to
boot.biosCdrom in nixos/tests/boot.nix:L33.
That makes them more consistent with the other tests."
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This makes it easier to test just a specific channel rather than to
force testing all builds down the users/testers throat. Especially this
makes it easier to test NixOS channel upgrades only against the Chromium
stable channel instead of just removing the beta/dev channels from the
tests entirely (as done in 69ec09f38a).
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Should clean up a lot of these redundant lines for various sub-tests.
Note that the tests.boot* are now called tests.boot.boot*, but otherwise
all the test attribute names should stay the same.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @edolstra
Cc: @wkennington
Cc: @bobvanderlinden
So far the networking test expression only generated a single test
depending on the passed "test" attribute. This makes it difficult to
autodiscover the subtests with our shiny new callSubTests function.
This change essentially doesn't change the behaviour of the subtests but
rather exposes them as an attribute set instead of relying on a
particular input argument.
The useNetworkd argument still exists however.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @wkennington
This should de-clutter the various redundant lines of callTest's on
subtests so that every main test file should have only one line with a
callSubTests instead.
Overrides work the same way as callTest, except that if the system
attribute is explicitly specified we do not generate attributes for all
available systems.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @edolstra
Now subtests are separate derivations, because the individual tests do
not depend on state from previous test runs.
This has the advantage that it's easier to run individiual tests and
it's also easier to pinpoint individual tests that randomly fail.
I ran all of these tests locally and they still succeed.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
