Unfortunately we don't have a better way to check whether the reload has
been done successfully, but at least we now *can* reload it without
figuring out the exact signal to send to the process.
Note that on reload, Taskserver will not reload the CRL file. For that
to work, a full restart needs to be done.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
If we want to revoke client certificates and want the server to actually
notice the revocation, we need to have a valid certificate revocation
list.
Right now the expiration_days is set to 10 years, but that's merely to
actually get certtool to actually generate the CRL without trying to
prompt for user input.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It doesn't do much harm to make the server certificate world readable,
because even though it's not accessible anymore via the file system,
someone can still get it by simply doing a TLS handshake with the
server.
So this is solely for consistency.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We now no longer have the stupid --service-helper option, which silences
messages about already existing organisations, users or groups.
Instead of that option, we now have a new subcommand called
"process-json", which accepts a JSON file directly from the specified
NixOS module options and creates/deletes the users accordingly.
Note that this still has a two issues left to solve in this area:
* Deletion is not supported yet.
* If a user is created imperatively, the next run of process-json will
delete it once deletion is supported.
So we need to implement deletion and a way to mark organisations, users
and groups as "imperatively managed".
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The Click functions really are for the command line and should be solely
used for that.
What I have in mind is that instead of that crappy --service-helper
argument, we should really have a new subcommand that is expecting JSON
which is directly coming from the services.taskserver.organisations
module option.
That way we can decrease even more boilerplate and we can also ensure
that organisations, users and groups get properly deleted if they're
removed from the NixOS configuration.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
With <olink/> support in place, we can now reference the Taskserver
section within the NixOS manual, so that users reading the manpage of
configuration.nix(5) won't miss this information.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
My first attempt to do this was to just use a conditional <refsection/>
in order to not create exact references in the manpage but create the
reference in the HTML manual, as suggested by @edolstra on IRC.
Later I went on to use <olink/> to reference sections of the manual, but
in order to do that, we need to overhaul how we generate the manual and
manpages.
So, that's where we are now:
There is a new derivation called "manual-olinkdb", which is the olinkdb
for the HTML manual, which in turn creates the olinkdb.xml file and the
manual.db. The former contains the targetdoc references and the latter
the specific targetptr elements.
The reason why I included the olinkdb.xml verbatim is that first of all
the DTD is dependent on the Docbook XSL sources and the references
within the olinkdb.xml entities are relative to the current directory.
So using a store path for that would end up searching for the manual.db
directly in /nix/store/manual.db.
Unfortunately, the <olinks/> that end up in the output file are
relative, so for example if you're clicking on one of these within the
PDF, the URL is searched in the current directory.
However, the sections from the olink's text are still valid, so we could
use an alternative URL for that in the future.
The manual doesn't contain any links, so even referencing the relative
URL shouldn't do any harm.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Cc: @edolstra
We're now using .pki.server.* and .pki.ca.* so that it's entirely clear
what these keys/certificates are for. For example we had just .pki.key
before, which doesn't really tell very much about what it's for except
if you look at the option description.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The improvement here is just that we're adding a big <note/> here so
that users of these options are aware that whenever they're setting one
of these the certificates and keys are _not_ created automatically.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This is clearly a server configuration option and has nothing to do with
certificate creation and signing, so let's move it away from the .pki
namespace.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It's not necessarily related to the PKI options, because this is also
used for setting the server address on the Taskwarrior client.
So if someone doesn't have his/her own certificates from another CA, all
options that need to be adjusted are in .pki. And if someone doesn't
want to bother with getting certificates from another CA, (s)he just
doesn't set anything in .pki.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
After moving out the PKI-unrelated options, let's name this a bit more
appropriate, so we can finally get rid of the taskserver.server thing.
This also moves taskserver.caCert to taskserver.pki.caCert, because that
clearly belongs to the PKI options.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Having an option called services.taskserver.server.host is quite
confusing because we already have "server" in the service name, so let's
first get rid of the listening options before we rename the rest of the
options in that .server attribute.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
As the nixos-taskserver command can also be used to imperatively manage
users, we need to test this as well.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
In the comments of the pull request @nbp wrote:
"Why is it implemented in 3 different languages: Nix, Bash and C?"
And he's right, it doesn't make sense, because we were using C as a
runuser replacement and used Nix to generate the shellscript
boilerplates.
Writing this in Python gets rid of all of this and we also don't need
the boilerplate as well, because we're using Click to handle all the
command line stuff.
Note that this currently is a 1:1 implementation of what we had before.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
fixes#13507
On June 8 (e8655ee) tortoisehg changed the way
it computes the `/usr/share` directory in a way that
invalidated the assumptions behind the use
of substituteInPlace in postUnpack.
I think the intention of this functionality was to provide a simple
alternative to the "runAsRoot" and "contents" attributes.
The implementation caused very slow builds of Docker images. Almost all
of the build time was spent in IO for tar, due to tarballs being
created, immediately extracted, then recreated. I had 30 minute builds
on some of my images which are now down to less than 2 minutes. A couple
of other users on #nix IRC have observed similar improvements.
The implementation also mutated the produced Docker layers without
changing their hashes. Using non-empty tarballs would produce images
which got cached incorrectly in Docker.
I have a commit which just fixes the performance problem but I opted to
completely remove the tarball feature after I found out that it didn't
correctly implement the Docker Image Specification due to the broken
hashing.
