This has been broken nearly all the time due to the patches needed to
iproute2 not being compatible with the newer versions we have been
shipping. As long as Ubuntu does not manage to upstream these changes
so they are maintained with iproute2 and we don't have a maintainer
updating these patches to new iproute2 versions it is not feasible to
have this available.
* openjdk 8: code cleanup
as recommended by 0xABAB in #27194
* openjdk 9: init at ea build 176
this starts with copy of 8.nix and just updates hashes and replaces 8
with 9. it also tweaks the version handling because we aren't dealing
with an update version yet.
* openjdk 9: adapt patches from openjdk 8
fix-java-home: surrounding code changed slightly
swing-use-gtk-jdk9: location of the file being patched changed due to
modularization
read-truststore-from-env: the code that handles the trustStore was
refactored out into a helper class in upstream commit
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/904861872c0e
adlc_updater: this isn't present anymore
* openjdk 9: make two more warnings-as-errors non-fatal
this requires that we switch to configureFlagsArray to deal with
whitespace
the errors being suppressed are show below:
* For target support_native_java.desktop_libawt_xawt_awt_Robot.o:
/tmp/nix-build-openjdk-9ea-b176.drv-0/jdk9-jdk-9+176/jdk/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_Robot.c: In function 'isXCompositeDisplay':
/tmp/nix-build-openjdk-9ea-b176.drv-0/jdk9-jdk-9+176/jdk/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_Robot.c:152:50: error: embedded '\0' in format
[-Werror=format-contains-nul]
snprintf(NET_WM_CM_Sn, sizeof(NET_WM_CM_Sn), "_NET_WM_CM_S%d\0", screenNumber);
^
/tmp/nix-build-openjdk-9ea-b176.drv-0/jdk9-jdk-9+176/jdk/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/awt/awt_Robot.c:152:50: error: embedded '\0' in format
[-Werror=format-contains-nul]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
* For target support_native_jdk.hotspot.agent_libsa_ps_core.o:
/tmp/nix-build-openjdk-9ea-b176.drv-0/jdk9-jdk-9+176/hotspot/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/linux/native/libsaproc/ps_core.c: In function 'read_exec_segments':
/tmp/nix-build-openjdk-9ea-b176.drv-0/jdk9-jdk-9+176/hotspot/src/jdk.hotspot.agent/linux/native/libsaproc/ps_core.c:834:7: error: ignoring return value of 'pread', declared
with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
pread(ph->core->exec_fd, interp_name, exec_php->p_filesz, exec_php->p_offset);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
* openjdk 9: ea+176 -> ea+180
* openjdk 9: TODO disable infinality patches, at least to start
the code being patched here seems to have changed substantially or
perhaps even disappeared altogether. need to investigate whether
these patches are still relevant.
* openjdk 9: update installPhase for modularization
* separate jdk and jre images are now present under build/*/images
* samples have been removed (JEP 298)
-- TODO that JEP says demos will be gone too, but it seems some are still present?
* bina directory is no longer present
* openjdk 9: TODO handle *.pf files or purge this code completely
* openjdk 9: update minimal jre components
in particular, the name of the config option for headless has changed,
per https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163102
* TODO about echo -n vs printWords, #27427
This includes fuse-common (fusePackages.fuse_3.common) as recommended by
upstream. But while fuse(2) and fuse3 would normally depend on
fuse-common we can't do that in nixpkgs while fuse-common is just
another output from the fuse3 multiple-output derivation (i.e. this
would result in a circular dependency). To avoid building fuse3 twice I
decided it would be best to copy the shared files (i.e. the ones
provided by fuse(2) and fuse3) from fuse-common to fuse (version 2) and
avoid collision warnings by defining priorities. Now it should be
possible to install an arbitrary combination of "fuse", "fuse3", and
"fuse-common" without getting any collision warnings. The end result
should be the same and all changes should be backwards compatible
(assuming that mount.fuse from fuse3 is backwards compatible as stated
by upstream [0] - if not this might break some /etc/fstab definitions
but that should be very unlikely).
My tests with sshfs (version 2 and 3) didn't show any problems.
See #28409 for some additional information.
[0]: https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0
