Handing CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE to the `paperless-web.service` only makes
sense when it actually wants to bind to a port < 1024. Don't hand it out
if that is not the case.
Finding out how to connect paperless to a PostgreSQL database via unix
sockets and peer authentication took me a few minutes, so leaving a hint
in the extraConfig example seems like a good idea to me.
Also remove unnecessary use of literalExpression for attribute set, it
is only required for complex values like functions or values that depend
on other values or packages.
After uploading a document through the webinterface I started seeing
it killed through the SYSBUS signal. Inspecting the call trace led me to
liblapack's memory allocator, that uses the mbind syscall on Linux.
Prior to this change, ffmpeg couldn't be built for an
environment.noXlibs system, because it would fail in:
ffmpeg → SDL2 → libdecor
ffmpeg certainly does not need support for SDL2 windowing on a noXlibs
system.
This fix is important because the minidlna NixOS test, which uses the
minimal profile (and therefore environment.noXlibs) and ffmpeg, can't
currently build.
The primary difference between the standard and minimal variants of
this package is that all the X libraries are removed from the minimal
variant.
I had to switch the order of the definitions in all-packages.nix to
avoid an infinite recursion after the overlay was applied.
The udisks2 service was enabled to fix the test in (c5ebec7ee4).
However, cagebreak doesn't require udisks2, just polkit (which the
udisks2 module enables and which is why the cagebreak test broke after
the udisks2 module was disabled by default).
I've documented why polkit is required in this PR:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/156858
In this case the "dependency" chain is basically cagebreak -> wlroots ->
libseat -> logind (with polkit support) -> polkit.
Because of long standing bugs and stability issues & an
uncollaborative upstream there has been talk on the emacs-devel
mailing list to switch the default toolkit to
Lucid (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-08/msg00752.html).
The GTK build also has issues with Xinput2, something that both we and
upstream want to enable by default in Emacs 29.
This situation has prompted me to use both Lucid an no-toolkit (pure X11) Emacs
as a daily driver in recent weeks to evaluate what the
advantages/drawbacks are and I have concluded that, at least for me,
switching the toolkit to Lucid is strictly an upgrade.
It has resulted in better stability (there are far fewer tiny UX
issues that are hard to understand/identify) & a snappier UI.
On top of that the closure size is reduced by ~10%.
In the pure X11 build I noticed some unsharpness around fonts so this
is not a good default choice.
As with everything there is a cost, and that is uglier (I think most
would agree but of course this is subjective) menu bars for
those that use them and no GTK scroll bars.
For anyone who still wants to use GTK they could of course still
choose to do so via the new `emacs-gtk` attribute but I think this
is a bad default.
A note to Wayland users:
This does not affect Wayland compatibility in any way since that will
already need a PGTK build variant in the future.
For example, the wait_for_unit() call in the Moodle test times out for
myself and others[1], so it would be good to be able to increase it to
something less likely to be hit by a test that would otherwise pass.
[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/177052#issue-1266336706
most of these are hidden because they're either part of a submodule that
doesn't have its type rendered (eg because the submodule type is used in
an either type) or because they are explicitly hidden. some of them are
merely hidden from nix-doc-munge by how their option is put together.
conversions were done using https://github.com/pennae/nix-doc-munge
using (probably) rev f34e145 running
nix-doc-munge nixos/**/*.nix
nix-doc-munge --import nixos/**/*.nix
the tool ensures that only changes that could affect the generated
manual *but don't* are committed, other changes require manual review
and are discarded.
there are sufficiently few variable list around, and they are
sufficiently simple, that it doesn't seem helpful to add another
markdown extension for them. rendering differences are small, except in
the tor module: admonitions inside other blocks cannot be made to work
well with mistune (and likely most other markdown processors), so those
had to be shuffled a bit. we also lose paragraph breaks in the list
items due to how we have to render from markdown to docbook, but once we
remove docbook from the pipeline those paragraph breaks will be restored.
mostly no rendering changes. some lists (like simplelist) don't have an
exact translation to markdown, so we use a comma-separated list of
literals instead.
