We fixed a race condition in #51505 and #51107. This required running
autoreconfHook to pick up the `coregrind-makefile-race.patch` patch.
Unfortunately this broke darwin's postPatch fixes as autoreconfHook would run
afterwards regenerating the fixed makefiles.
Moving the postPatch fixes to preConfigure should resolve the issue.
I left `postPatch = ""` in to avoid a rebuild on linux.
(cherry picked from commit a6d4a0c53c)
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/51107 added a patch to Makefile.am to fix
a race condition in the build. It was unfortunately never picked up as we we're
using the generated makefile from the tarball.
The bzero-patch was merged upstream in
git-svn-id: svn://svn.valgrind.org/valgrind/trunk@16103, so it does no
longer apply.
Additionally - to make the build succeed on darwin systems more recent
than our nixpkgs.darwin.xnu kernel version - we need to teach the build
the version of the xnu headers we provide, instead of letting the build
figure out the actual system version using `uname -r`.
The following parameters are now available:
* hardeningDisable
To disable specific hardening flags
* hardeningEnable
To enable specific hardening flags
Only the cc-wrapper supports this right now, but these may be reused by
other wrappers, builders or setup hooks.
cc-wrapper supports the following flags:
* fortify
* stackprotector
* pie (disabled by default)
* pic
* strictoverflow
* format
* relro
* bindnow
(My OCD kicked in today...)
Remove repeated package names, capitalize first word, remove trailing
periods and move overlong descriptions to longDescription.
I also simplified some descriptions as well, when they were particularly
long or technical, often based on Arch Linux' package descriptions.
I've tried to stay away from generated expressions (and I think I
succeeded).
Some specifics worth mentioning:
* cron, has "Vixie Cron" in its description. The "Vixie" part is not
mentioned anywhere else. I kept it in a parenthesis at the end of the
description.
* ctags description started with "Exuberant Ctags ...", and the
"exuberant" part is not mentioned elsewhere. Kept it in a parenthesis
at the end of description.
* nix has the description "The Nix Deployment System". Since that
doesn't really say much what it is/does (especially after removing
the package name!), I changed that to "Powerful package manager that
makes package management reliable and reproducible" (borrowed from
nixos.org).
* Tons of "GNU Foo, Foo is a [the important bits]" descriptions
is changed to just [the important bits]. If the package name doesn't
contain GNU I don't think it's needed to say it in the description
either.
