This might be a bit debatable but upstream uses "xx" instead of "++"
when using it as identifier / in the code (file/directory names, build
scripts, website URLs, etc.) so we should probably too.
And at least the attribute name and pname will be consistent now.
mrustc is mostly patched to use shared LLVM sources but still uses
in-tree source for compiler-rt from LLVM 7. This needs to be patched to
compile under glibc 2.31 or later. It's easy enough to reapply all our
compiler-rt patches here.
This patch was applied to gcc7 in aab8c7ba43 ("netbsd: add cross target"),
but it hasn't been brought forward to newer compilers that have the
same problem.
GCC 6 and (probably) GCC 4.9 also have the issue, but the patch
doesn't apply cleanly to them so I'm leaving them alone for now.
GCC 10, our current default, appears to have finally fixed this.
Remove old CUDA toolkits (and corresponding CuDNN versions).
- Not supported by upstream anymore.
- We do not use them in nixpkgs.
- We do not test or actively maintain them.
- Anything but ancient GPUs is supported by newer toolkits.
Fixes#107131.
This commit patches one of the llvm-exegesis tests to swap out whatever
CPU model happens to be on the build host for bdver2 (AMD Family
15h/Piledriver), which was picked because it looks like that was the
intent of the test author. This provides a more predictable compilation
behaviour when running on older (or possibly even newer!) machines.
One of the machines that is currently part of the NixOS Hydra build
farm, wendy, is using an old AMD Opteron CPU for which LLVM has no
scheduling machine model. This causes one of the tests for llvm-exegesis
to fail, because it segfaults trying to use the machine model to produce
useful analysis results.
Note that this particular test only runs on x86-64 build hosts anyway;
aarch64 isn't affected.
This deliberately only patches LLVM 12 to limit the rebuilds; other
LLVM versions are going through staging.
It is building fine locally, tested by myself and @SuperSandro2000 (who had added the broken tag).
Should this be tested on hydra before removing it? I don't know if that is even possible.
This patches are included from libcxx and libcxxabi when
stdenv.hostPlatform.isMusl. After #117433 the patchs to that patch
wasn't adjusted for the new structure, likely because it doesn't come up
during normal eval. This fixes (among other attribute paths):
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_12.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_12.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_11.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_11.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_10.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_10.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_9.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_9.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_8.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_8.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_7.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_7.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_6.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_6.libcxx
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_5.libcxxabi
* pkgsMusl.llvmPackages_5.libcxx
Only evaluation was tested, not compilation though.
