This is a bit of a thorny issue. See, the actual `diskSize` variable is
for the *total* disk size, not for the filesystem!
The automatic numbers are meant to compute the *filesystem* required
space. So we have to add any other reserved space!
We have different requirements for reserved space. E.g. there could be
none (when it's actually a filesystem image). There could also be 1MiB
for alignment for an MBR image, legacy+gpt needs 2MiB, then GPT with an
ESP ("bootSize") needs to take the boot partition and GPT size into
account too!
Though luckily(?) for this latter situation we can cheat! As noted in the
change, `bootSize` is NOT the boot partition size. It is actually the
offset where the target filesystem starts.
Reserved space includes:
- inodes space in use (2 blocks per)
- about 5.2% of the space
The 5.2% reserved space was computed empirically when working on a
previous EXT4 image builder. It seems to stabilize around 5% even for
much larger filesystems.
On some filesystems, `du` without `--apparent-size` will not give the
actual size for a file. Using `--apparent-size` will give us the actual
file size.
Though, this is not actually correct still. 1000 × 1 bytes is not 1000
bytes. It is 1000 × ceil(filesize/blockSize)*blockSize.
So instead of adding up the actual file sizes. We are adding up the
block sizes.
Note that this also changes the builder to work with *bytes*, rather
than with any other units. Doing maths on bytes is less likely to go
awry than doing it on other units.
As a temporary workaround for #120473 while the image builder is patched
to correctly look up disk sizes, partially revert
f3aa040bcb for EC2 disk images only.
We retain the type allowing "auto" but set the default back to the
previous value.
When performing OCR, some of the Tesseract settings perform better than
others on a variety of different workloads, but they mostly take
~negligible incremental time to run compared to the overhead of running
the ImageMagick filters.
After this commit, we try using all three of the current Tesseract
models (classic, LSTM, and classic+LSTM) to generate output text. This
fixes chromium-90's tests at release-20.09, and should make cases where
you're looking for *specific* text better, with the tradeoff of running
Tesseract multiple times.
To make it sensible to cherrypick this into release-20.09, this doesn't
change the existing API surface for the test driver. In particular,
get_screen_text continues to have the existing behaviour.
backends changing shouldn't be very likely, but services may well change. we
should restart sshguard from nixos-rebuild instead of merely plopping down a new
config file and waiting for the user to restart sshguard.
Rather than relying on carefully avoiding touching the 9P-mounted
/nix/store, we instead install a small NixOS system, similar to
the installer tests, and boot from that.
This avoids the various pitfalls associated with trying to unsuspend
properly and trades off a bunch of boilerplate for what will hopefully
be a more reliable test.
Additionally, this test now actually tests booting the system using a
bootloader, rather than the previous method of just booting the kernel
directly.
There is no need for a separate unit. Simplify the NixOS module by adding the shell code to preStart of the main unit, where the other initialization code already is.
Things will get quite broken if an /etc/passwd entry contains a
colon (which terminates a field), or a newline (which terminates a
record). I know because I just accidentally made a user whose home
directory path contained a newline!
So let's make sure that can't happen.
Upstream repositories do no longer exists. There has been no release in
a while. - Not a good combination for a network daemon running as root
in C that parses network packets...
aa22be179a dropped the backend setting
which was used in the test, breaking evaluation of the test in the
process. Kind of defeats the purpose of a test if it isn't executed
before merging a change to a module…
Remove old CUDA toolkits (and corresponding CuDNN versions).
- Not supported by upstream anymore.
- We do not use them in nixpkgs.
- We do not test or actively maintain them.
- Anything but ancient GPUs is supported by newer toolkits.
Fixes#107131.
* nixos/nginx: add upstreams examples
I am not fully sure if they are fully correct but they deployed the right syntax.
* nixos/nginx: use literal example
* Update nixos/modules/services/web-servers/nginx/default.nix
* Update nixos/modules/services/web-servers/nginx/default.nix
