These servers apparently no longer exist, since September 2, 2021[1].
If somebody needs this for non-Scaleway machines, they should suggest
its reintroduction with a different name.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27192757
Very confusingly, the `isPowerPC` predicate in
`lib/systems/inspect.nix` does *not* match `powerpc64le`!
This is because `isPowerPC` is defined as
isPowerPC = { cpu = cpuTypes.powerpc; };
Where `cpuTypes.powerpc` is:
{ bits = 32; significantByte = bigEndian; family = "power"; };
This means that the `isPowerPC` predicate actually only matches the
subset of machines marketed under this name which happen to be 32-bit
and running in big-endian mode which is equivalent to:
with stdenv.hostPlatform; isPower && isBigEndian && is32bit
This seems like a sharp edge that people could easily cut themselves
on. In fact, that has already happened: in
`linux/kernel/common-config.nix` there is a test which will always
fail:
(stdenv.hostPlatform.isPowerPC && stdenv.hostPlatform.is64bit)
A more subtle case of the strict isPowerPC being used instead of the
moreg general isPower accidentally are the GHC expressions:
Update pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/8.10.7.nix
Update pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/8.8.4.nix
Update pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/9.2.2.nix
Update pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/9.0.2.nix
Update pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/head.nix
Since the remaining legitimate use sites of isPowerPC are so few, remove
the isPowerPC predicate completely. The alternative expression above is
noted in the release notes as an alternative.
Co-authored-by: sternenseemann <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
canExecute is like isCompatible, but also checks that the Kernels are
_equal_, i.e. that both platforms use the same syscall interface. This
is crucial in order to actually be able to execute binaries for the
other platform.
isCompatible is dropped, since it has changed semantically and there's
no use case left in nixpkgs.
Since we (exclusively) use isCompatible to gauge whether platform a can
execute binaries built for platform b, mode switching CPUs are not to be
considered compatible for our purposes: Switching the mode of a CPU
usually requires a reset. At the very least we can't execute a mix of
executables for the two modes which would usually be the case in nixpkgs
where we may want to execute buildInputs for the hostPlatform in
addition to nativeBuildInputs for the buildPlatform.
Since the list only gates the platforms the nixpkgs flake exposes
packages to build on, the `hydra` label made little sense. It was also
only used for this purpose, so the `tier*` attributes were largely
unnecessary.
To reflect the intention more accurately, we expose
`lib.systems.flakeExposed` and use it to gate flake.nix's system list.
This reverts commit PR #167947.
Flakes aren't standardised and the `lib` namespace shouldn't be
polluted with utilities that serve only experimental uses.
This patch causes the autodetection code in lib/systems/platforms.nix
to return {} if it cannot detect the platform and one of the
platform.nix-detection-provided attributes (linux-kernel, gcc, and
rustc) are accessed, rather than silently assuming the "pc" platform
as was previously done.
It is definitely safe to assume that code using these attributes is
prepared to deal with `gcc` and `rustc` not being defined, because
many of the working entries in this file don't define it.
Regarding `linux-kernel` the situation is less certain, but some code
(`lib/systems/default.nix` for example) is already designed to deal
with that attribute being missing. At worst it would result in an
"attribute not found" error.
While adding mips64el bootstrap support to nixpkgs, the silent
assumption that mips64el routers are actually Intel PCs caused
significant frustration. This commit removes that assumption in order
to save people who port nixpkgs to new platforms in the future from
this frustration.
For other platforms like Intel and ARM, we can do
e.g. lib.platforms.aarch64 to get only the 64-bit ARM platorms, but
until now there were no equivalents for RISC-V.
Probably being the most prominent document demonstrating the problem,
configuration.nix(5) describes various types in plural, e.g.
- ` Type: list of strings`
- ` Type: list of systemd options`
However, there are other cases where appending "s" to the inner type
effectively changes the type, e.g.
- ```
Type: list of string matching the pattern
[a-zA-Z0-9@%:_.\-]+[.](service|socket|device|mount|automount|swap|target|path|timer|scope|slice)s
```
This should've read "list of string[s]..." but instead changes the
regular expression.
Simply drop the best-effort plural in favour of correctness and
simplicity rather than adding more grammar related logic/trying to fix
this.
* lib/strings: optimise hasInfix function
* lib/strings: optimise hasInfix further using regex
* rstudio: call hasInfix with a string
* lib/strings: remove let from hasInfix
Co-authored-by: pennae <82953136+pennae@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pennae <82953136+pennae@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit creates flakes.nix, which is a library containing functions
which relate to interacting with flakes. It also moves related functions
from trivial.nix into it.
This is essentially a copy of the function of the same name, from
flake-compat. callLocklessFlake is useful when trying to utilise a
flake.nix without a lock file, often for when you want to create a
subflake from within a parent flake.
Co-authored-by: Tom Bereknyei <tomberek@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#168327
The issue reported there can be demonstrated with the following
expression:
→ nix-instantiate --eval -E "with import ./. {}; pkgs.lib.options.showDefs [ { file = \"foo\"; value = pkgs.rust.packages.stable.buildRustPackages; } ]"
error: attempt to call something which is not a function but a string
at /home/ma27/Projects/nixpkgs/lib/trivial.nix:442:35:
441| isFunction = f: builtins.isFunction f ||
442| (f ? __functor && isFunction (f.__functor f));
| ^
443|
Basically, if a `__functor` is in an attribute-set at depth-limit,
`__functor` will be set to `"<unevaluated>"`. This however breaks
`lib.isFunction` which checks for a `__functor` by invoking `__functor`
with `f` itself.
The same issue - "magic" attributes being shadowed by `withRecursion` -
also applies to others such as
`__pretty`/`__functionArgs`/`__toString`.
Since these attributes have a low-risk of causing a stack overflow
(because these are flat attr-sets or even functions), ignoring them in
`withRecursion` seems like a valid solution.
This allows other module system consumers to
disable these docs via option merging.
For instance arion uses asciidoc instead of
docbook so that would look awful.
