* master: (81 commits)
Add NixOS 17.09 AMIs
gradle: 4.2 -> 4.2.1
maintainers.nix: use my GitHub handle as maintainer name
fcitx-engines.rime: init at 0.3.2
brise: init at 2017-09-16
librime: init at 1.2.9
marisa: init at 0.2.4
opencc: build shared library and programs
josm: 12712 -> 12914
exa: 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0
krb5: add deprecation date for old configuration
rustRegistry: 2017-09-10 -> 2017-10-03
go-ethereum: Fix libusb segmentation faults on Darwin
tor-browser-bundle-bin: 7.0.5 -> 7.0.6
libsodium: 1.0.13 -> 1.0.15
tor-browser-bundle: geoip support
tor-browser-bundle: support transports obfs2,obfs3
tor-browser-bundle: bump https-everywhere to 2017.9.12
tint2: limit platforms to Linux since macOS is not supported and fails the tests
eclipse-plugin-vrapper: init at 0.72.0
...
This has been broken nearly all the time due to the patches needed to
iproute2 not being compatible with the newer versions we have been
shipping. As long as Ubuntu does not manage to upstream these changes
so they are maintained with iproute2 and we don't have a maintainer
updating these patches to new iproute2 versions it is not feasible to
have this available.
This includes fuse-common (fusePackages.fuse_3.common) as recommended by
upstream. But while fuse(2) and fuse3 would normally depend on
fuse-common we can't do that in nixpkgs while fuse-common is just
another output from the fuse3 multiple-output derivation (i.e. this
would result in a circular dependency). To avoid building fuse3 twice I
decided it would be best to copy the shared files (i.e. the ones
provided by fuse(2) and fuse3) from fuse-common to fuse (version 2) and
avoid collision warnings by defining priorities. Now it should be
possible to install an arbitrary combination of "fuse", "fuse3", and
"fuse-common" without getting any collision warnings. The end result
should be the same and all changes should be backwards compatible
(assuming that mount.fuse from fuse3 is backwards compatible as stated
by upstream [0] - if not this might break some /etc/fstab definitions
but that should be very unlikely).
My tests with sshfs (version 2 and 3) didn't show any problems.
See #28409 for some additional information.
[0]: https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/releases/tag/fuse-3.0.0
