I no longer use rancher and can test this derivation.
Also rancher-compose should have the same version as the rancher cluster
used. So it is better to be build by the user using it rather having a
random version in nixpkgs.
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools.
This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/virtualbox/versions.
These checks were done:
- built on NixOS
- ran ‘/nix/store/6769l9s88jlcv3qgxpjsfr1ybkq3yvvb-virtualbox-5.2.12/bin/VBoxManage -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/6769l9s88jlcv3qgxpjsfr1ybkq3yvvb-virtualbox-5.2.12/bin/VBoxManage --help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/6769l9s88jlcv3qgxpjsfr1ybkq3yvvb-virtualbox-5.2.12/bin/VBoxManage help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/6769l9s88jlcv3qgxpjsfr1ybkq3yvvb-virtualbox-5.2.12/bin/VBoxBalloonCtrl -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/6769l9s88jlcv3qgxpjsfr1ybkq3yvvb-virtualbox-5.2.12/bin/VBoxBalloonCtrl --help’ got 0 exit code
- found 5.2.12 with grep in /nix/store/6769l9s88jlcv3qgxpjsfr1ybkq3yvvb-virtualbox-5.2.12
- directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/f9bf852a0a8e6e0b4c44a9b68764850b
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools.
This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/containerd/versions.
These checks were done:
- built on NixOS
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/containerd -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/containerd --help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/containerd help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/containerd-release -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/containerd-release --help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/containerd-release help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/ctr -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/ctr --help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0/bin/ctr help’ got 0 exit code
- found 1.1.0 with grep in /nix/store/lmnlz9w8fhf71pxl7wlhv9vsv4k3bnxd-containerd-1.1.0
- directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/7b4a990853acfbf946f8abe02582f41d
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools.
This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/tini/versions.
These checks were done:
- built on NixOS
- ran ‘/nix/store/h0h2qyxwrvsjy47m1xyv7sxzd2j0ilsi-tini-0.18.0/bin/tini -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/h0h2qyxwrvsjy47m1xyv7sxzd2j0ilsi-tini-0.18.0/bin/tini --version’ and found version 0.18.0
- found 0.18.0 with grep in /nix/store/h0h2qyxwrvsjy47m1xyv7sxzd2j0ilsi-tini-0.18.0
- directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/c992fd0a24dfc0365d6b62ac567d395c
Following legacy packing conventions, `isArm` was defined just for
32-bit ARM instruction set. This is confusing to non packagers though,
because Aarch64 is an ARM instruction set.
The official ARM overview for ARMv8[1] is surprisingly not confusing,
given the overall state of affairs for ARM naming conventions, and
offers us a solution. It divides the nomenclature into three levels:
```
ISA: ARMv8 {-A, -R, -M}
/ \
Mode: Aarch32 Aarch64
| / \
Encoding: A64 A32 T32
```
At the top is the overall v8 instruction set archicture. Second are the
two modes, defined by bitwidth but differing in other semantics too, and
buttom are the encodings, (hopefully?) isomorphic if they encode the
same mode.
The 32 bit encodings are mostly backwards compatible with previous
non-Thumb and Thumb encodings, and if so we can pun the mode names to
instead mean "sets of compatable or isomorphic encodings", and then
voilà we have nice names for 32-bit and 64-bit arm instruction sets
which do not use the word ARM so as to not confused either laymen or
experienced ARM packages.
[1]: https://developer.arm.com/products/architecture/a-profile
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools.
This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/singularity/versions.
These checks were done:
- built on NixOS
- ran ‘/nix/store/0rcn1kn4j7rmr0qn314g28vpa4xf230d-singularity-2.4.6/bin/singularity -h’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/0rcn1kn4j7rmr0qn314g28vpa4xf230d-singularity-2.4.6/bin/singularity --help’ got 0 exit code
- ran ‘/nix/store/0rcn1kn4j7rmr0qn314g28vpa4xf230d-singularity-2.4.6/bin/singularity help’ got 0 exit code
- found 2.4.6 with grep in /nix/store/0rcn1kn4j7rmr0qn314g28vpa4xf230d-singularity-2.4.6
- directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/e2f21872e885760acf461b07dd5b4f86
