Rust 1.50.0 incorporated a Cargo change (rust-lang/cargo#8937) in
which cargo vendor erroneously changed permissions of vendored
crates. This was fixed in Rust
1.51.0 (rust-lang/cargo#9131). Unfortunately, this means that all
cargoSha256/cargoHashes produced during the Rust 1.50.0 cycle are
potentially broken.
This change updates cargoSha256/cargoHash tree-wide.
Fixes#121994.
* ripgrep: Add installCheckPhase
Convert test removed in dd63561bcb
to an installCheckPhase
* Update pkgs/tools/text/ripgrep/default.nix
Co-authored-by: Sandro <sandro.jaeckel@gmail.com>
The pcre2 crate which is used by ripgrep uses pkg-config to find the
path of the PCRE2 dynamic library. If the pkg-config or the library is
not found, PCRE2 will be built/linked statically.
This change adds pkg-config to the nativeBuildInputs of ripgrep, so
that the PCRE2 library is detected and dynamically linked.
Includes some bugfixes/cleanups to the scripts and packaging, a run of the
updater, a bump of the version, an upgrade to the newer cargo fetcher in #79975,
and gets the web assembly portion to compile successfully.
Fixes#75863
Changes the default fetcher in the Rust Platform to be the newer
`fetchCargoTarball`, and changes every application using the current default to
instead opt out.
This commit does not change any hashes or cause any rebuilds. Once integrated,
we will start deleting the opt-outs and recomputing hashes.
See #79975 for details.
Idea shamelessly stolen from 4e60b0efae.
I realized that I don't really know anymore where I'm listed as maintainer and what
I'm actually (co)-maintaining which means that I can't proactively take
care of packages I officially maintain.
As I don't have the time, energy and motivation to take care of stuff I
was interested in 1 or 2 years ago (or packaged for someone else in the
past), I decided that I make this explicit by removing myself from several
packages and adding myself in some other stuff I'm now interested in.
I've seen it several times now that people remove themselves from a
package without removing the package if it's unmaintained after that
which is why I figured that it's fine in my case as the affected pkgs
are rather low-prio and were pretty easy to maintain.
A recent upgrade of cargo-vendor changed its output slightly, which
broke all cargoSha256 hashes in nixpkgs.
See https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60668 for more information.
Since then, a few hashes have been fixed in master by hand, but there
were a lot still to do, so I did all of the ones left over with some
scripts I wrote.
The one hash I wasn’t able to update was habitat's, because it’s
currently broken and the build doesn’t get far enough to produce a
hash anyway.
