I have effectively not really maintained it in a while, since I had no
use-case.
Now that ryantm-bot has stopped reacting to updates of the package, I
don’t see this improving.
I hope somebody else steps up, an up-to-date rabbitmq in nixpkgs is
quite important.
ed16f83 made all dependencies explicit, including systemd, which makes the
build step to fail on macOS. Here systemd is added to runtimePath only if the
target system is Linux
According to https://repology.org/repository/nix_unstable/problems, we have a
lot of packages that have http links that redirect to https as their homepage.
This commit updates all these packages to use the https links as their
homepage.
The following script was used to make these updates:
```
curl https://repology.org/api/v1/repository/nix_unstable/problems \
| jq '.[] | .problem' -r \
| rg 'Homepage link "(.+)" is a permanent redirect to "(.+)" and should be updated' --replace 's@$1@$2@' \
| sort | uniq > script.sed
find -name '*.nix' | xargs -P4 -- sed -f script.sed -i
```
Some things were provided by default, some by systemd unit and some
were just miraculously working. This turns them into explicit
dependencies of the package itself, making everything properly
overrideable.
+ providing glibcLocales fixes elixir compile warnings
+ providing systemd dependency allows rabbit to use systemctl for unit
activation check instead of falling back to sleep. This was seen as
a warning during startup.
Idea shamelessly stolen from 4e60b0efae.
I realized that I don't really know anymore where I'm listed as maintainer and what
I'm actually (co)-maintaining which means that I can't proactively take
care of packages I officially maintain.
As I don't have the time, energy and motivation to take care of stuff I
was interested in 1 or 2 years ago (or packaged for someone else in the
past), I decided that I make this explicit by removing myself from several
packages and adding myself in some other stuff I'm now interested in.
I've seen it several times now that people remove themselves from a
package without removing the package if it's unmaintained after that
which is why I figured that it's fine in my case as the affected pkgs
are rather low-prio and were pretty easy to maintain.
