Merge pull request #105865 from adisbladis/CVE-2020-25659
python2.pkgs.cryptography: Fix CVE-2020-25659
This commit is contained in:
commit
6c2d29a077
@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ buildPythonPackage rec {
|
||||
sha256 = "0af25w5mkd6vwns3r6ai1w5ip9xp0ms9s261zzssbpadzdr05hx0";
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
patches = [ ./CVE-2020-25659.patch ];
|
||||
|
||||
outputs = [ "out" "dev" ];
|
||||
|
||||
buildInputs = [ openssl ]
|
||||
@ -70,6 +72,5 @@ buildPythonPackage rec {
|
||||
+ replaceStrings [ "." ] [ "-" ] version;
|
||||
license = with licenses; [ asl20 bsd3 psfl ];
|
||||
maintainers = with maintainers; [ primeos ];
|
||||
knownVulnerabilities = [ "CVE-2020-25659" "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hggm-jpg3-v476" ];
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
Backported of:
|
||||
|
||||
From 58494b41d6ecb0f56b7c5f05d5f5e3ca0320d494 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>
|
||||
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:16:42 -0400
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Attempt to mitigate Bleichenbacher attacks on RSA decryption
|
||||
(#5507)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt b/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
|
||||
index 6e4675d..ce66c28 100644
|
||||
--- a/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
|
||||
+++ b/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
|
||||
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ backend
|
||||
Backends
|
||||
backends
|
||||
bcrypt
|
||||
+Bleichenbacher
|
||||
Blowfish
|
||||
boolean
|
||||
Botan
|
||||
diff --git a/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py b/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py
|
||||
index 3e4c2fd..6303f95 100644
|
||||
--- a/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py
|
||||
+++ b/src/cryptography/hazmat/backends/openssl/rsa.py
|
||||
@@ -117,40 +117,19 @@ def _enc_dec_rsa_pkey_ctx(backend, key, data, padding_enum, padding):
|
||||
|
||||
outlen = backend._ffi.new("size_t *", buf_size)
|
||||
buf = backend._ffi.new("unsigned char[]", buf_size)
|
||||
+ # Everything from this line onwards is written with the goal of being as
|
||||
+ # constant-time as is practical given the constraints of Python and our
|
||||
+ # API. See Bleichenbacher's '98 attack on RSA, and its many many variants.
|
||||
+ # As such, you should not attempt to change this (particularly to "clean it
|
||||
+ # up") without understanding why it was written this way (see
|
||||
+ # Chesterton's Fence), and without measuring to verify you have not
|
||||
+ # introduced observable time differences.
|
||||
res = crypt(pkey_ctx, buf, outlen, data, len(data))
|
||||
+ resbuf = backend._ffi.buffer(buf)[: outlen[0]]
|
||||
+ backend._lib.ERR_clear_error()
|
||||
if res <= 0:
|
||||
- _handle_rsa_enc_dec_error(backend, key)
|
||||
-
|
||||
- return backend._ffi.buffer(buf)[:outlen[0]]
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-def _handle_rsa_enc_dec_error(backend, key):
|
||||
- errors = backend._consume_errors()
|
||||
- backend.openssl_assert(errors)
|
||||
- backend.openssl_assert(errors[0].lib == backend._lib.ERR_LIB_RSA)
|
||||
- if isinstance(key, _RSAPublicKey):
|
||||
- backend.openssl_assert(
|
||||
- errors[0].reason == backend._lib.RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE
|
||||
- )
|
||||
- raise ValueError(
|
||||
- "Data too long for key size. Encrypt less data or use a "
|
||||
- "larger key size."
|
||||
- )
|
||||
- else:
|
||||
- decoding_errors = [
|
||||
- backend._lib.RSA_R_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_NOT_01,
|
||||
- backend._lib.RSA_R_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_NOT_02,
|
||||
- backend._lib.RSA_R_OAEP_DECODING_ERROR,
|
||||
- # Though this error looks similar to the
|
||||
- # RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE, this occurs on decrypts,
|
||||
- # rather than on encrypts
|
||||
- backend._lib.RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS,
|
||||
- ]
|
||||
- if backend._lib.Cryptography_HAS_RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR:
|
||||
- decoding_errors.append(backend._lib.RSA_R_PKCS_DECODING_ERROR)
|
||||
-
|
||||
- backend.openssl_assert(errors[0].reason in decoding_errors)
|
||||
- raise ValueError("Decryption failed.")
|
||||
+ raise ValueError("Encryption/decryption failed.")
|
||||
+ return resbuf
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rsa_sig_determine_padding(backend, key, padding, algorithm):
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user