Shea told me composableDerivation is hard to understand.
Thus comment it and why it was written long time ago until it'll get replaced piecewise.
This commit is contained in:
parent
bfc524664a
commit
31fc4c6aa4
@ -1,15 +1,74 @@
|
||||
{lib, pkgs} :
|
||||
let inherit (lib) nv nvs; in
|
||||
{
|
||||
# see for example:
|
||||
# - development/interpreters/php_configurable/default.nix
|
||||
# - .. search composableDerivation in all-packages.nix ..
|
||||
|
||||
# composableDerivation basically mixes these features:
|
||||
# - fix function
|
||||
# - mergeAttrBy
|
||||
# - provides shortcuts for "options" such as "--enable-foo" and adding
|
||||
# buildInputs, see php example
|
||||
#
|
||||
# You should be able to override anything you like easily
|
||||
# grep the mailinglist by title "python proposal" (dec 08)
|
||||
# -> http://mail.cs.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2008-December/001571.html
|
||||
# to see why this got complicated when using all its features
|
||||
# TODO add newer example using new syntax (kernel derivation proposal -> mailinglist)
|
||||
# It predates styles which are common today, such as
|
||||
# * the config attr
|
||||
# * mkDerivation.override feature
|
||||
# * overrideDerivation (lib/customization.nix)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Some of the most more important usage examples (which could be rewritten if it was important):
|
||||
# * php
|
||||
# * postgis
|
||||
# * vim_configurable
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A minimal example illustrating most features would look like this:
|
||||
# let base = composableDerivation { (fixed : let inherit (fixed.fixed) name in {
|
||||
# src = fetchurl {
|
||||
# }
|
||||
# buildInputs = [A];
|
||||
# preConfigre = "echo ${name}";
|
||||
# # attention, "name" attr is missing, thus you cannot instantiate "base".
|
||||
# }
|
||||
# in {
|
||||
# # These all add name attribute, thus you can instantiate those:
|
||||
# v1 = base.merge ({ name = "foo-add-B"; buildInputs = [B]; }); // B gets merged into buildInputs
|
||||
# v2 = base.merge ({ name = "mix-in-pre-configure-lines" preConfigre = ""; });
|
||||
# v3 = base.replace ({ name = "foo-no-A-only-B;" buildInputs = [B]; });
|
||||
# }
|
||||
#
|
||||
# So yes, you can think about it being something like nixos modules, and
|
||||
# you'd be merging "features" in one at a time using .merge or .replace
|
||||
# Thanks Shea for telling me that I rethink the documentation ..
|
||||
#
|
||||
# issues:
|
||||
# * its complicated to understand
|
||||
# * some "features" such as exact merge behaviour are burried in mergeAttrBy
|
||||
# and defaultOverridableDelayableArgs assuming the default behaviour does
|
||||
# the right thing in the common case
|
||||
# * Eelco once said using such fix style functions are slow to evaluate
|
||||
# * Too quick & dirty. Hard to understand for others. The benefit was that
|
||||
# you were able to create a kernel builder like base derivation and replace
|
||||
# / add patches the way you want without having to declare function arguments
|
||||
#
|
||||
# nice features:
|
||||
# declaring "optional featuers" is modular. For instance:
|
||||
# flags.curl = {
|
||||
# configureFlags = ["--with-curl=${curl}" "--with-curlwrappers"];
|
||||
# buildInputs = [curl openssl];
|
||||
# };
|
||||
# flags.other = { .. }
|
||||
# (Example taken from PHP)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# alternative styles / related features:
|
||||
# * Eg see function supporting building the kernel
|
||||
# * versionedDerivation (discussion about this is still going on - or ended)
|
||||
# * composedArgsAndFun
|
||||
# * mkDerivation.override
|
||||
# * overrideDerivation
|
||||
# * using { .., *Support ? false }: like configurable options.
|
||||
# To find those examples use grep
|
||||
#
|
||||
# To sum up: It exists for historical reasons - and for most commonly used
|
||||
# tasks the alternatives should be used
|
||||
#
|
||||
# If you have questions about this code ping Marc Weber.
|
||||
composableDerivation = {
|
||||
mkDerivation ? pkgs.stdenv.mkDerivation,
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user