iputils: Increase the priority to avoid collisions with inetutils (#78408)
The ping binary will be from iputils anyway since it's installed in /run/wrappers/bin/ (first in $PATH) and tftpd will be from iputils as well since inetutils installs it into libexec (not in $PATH). Therefore, there's not even a real choice here (though we should most likely prefer iputils anyway). Current collisions: collision between `/nix/store/...-iputils-20190709/bin/ping' and `/nix/store/...-inetutils-1.9.4/bin/ping' collision between `/nix/store/...-iputils-20190709/share/man/man8/tftpd.8.gz' and `/nix/store/...-inetutils-1.9.4/share/man/man8/tftpd.8.gz'
This commit is contained in:
parent
89864a01d1
commit
24b7d0de7b
@ -16259,7 +16259,8 @@ in
|
||||
|
||||
iproute_mptcp = callPackage ../os-specific/linux/iproute/mptcp.nix { };
|
||||
|
||||
iputils = callPackage ../os-specific/linux/iputils { };
|
||||
iputils = hiPrio (callPackage ../os-specific/linux/iputils { });
|
||||
# hiPrio for collisions with inetutils (ping and tftpd.8.gz)
|
||||
|
||||
iptables = iptables-legacy;
|
||||
iptables-legacy = callPackage ../os-specific/linux/iptables { };
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user