Merge pull request #42185 from ariutta/rewording
docs: minor rewording for easier reading.
This commit is contained in:
commit
1dc3f82bad
@ -6,18 +6,22 @@
|
||||
<title>Reviewing contributions</title>
|
||||
<warning>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The following section is a draft and reviewing policy is still being
|
||||
discussed.
|
||||
The following section is a draft, and the policy for reviewing is still being
|
||||
discussed in issues such as <link
|
||||
xlink:href="https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/11166">#11166
|
||||
</link> and <link
|
||||
xlink:href="https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/20836">#20836
|
||||
</link>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</warning>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The nixpkgs projects receives a fairly high number of contributions via
|
||||
The nixpkgs project receives a fairly high number of contributions via
|
||||
GitHub pull-requests. Reviewing and approving these is an important task and
|
||||
a way to contribute to the project.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The high change rate of nixpkgs make any pull request that is open for long
|
||||
enough subject to conflicts that will require extra work from the submitter
|
||||
The high change rate of nixpkgs makes any pull request that remains open for
|
||||
too long subject to conflicts that will require extra work from the submitter
|
||||
or the merger. Reviewing pull requests in a timely manner and being
|
||||
responsive to the comments is the key to avoid these. GitHub provides sort
|
||||
filters that can be used to see the
|
||||
@ -33,34 +37,34 @@
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
When reviewing a pull request, please always be nice and polite.
|
||||
Controversial changes can lead to controversial opinions, but it is important
|
||||
to respect every community members and their work.
|
||||
to respect every community member and their work.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
GitHub provides reactions, they are a simple and quick way to provide
|
||||
GitHub provides reactions as a simple and quick way to provide
|
||||
feedback to pull-requests or any comments. The thumb-down reaction should be
|
||||
used with care and if possible accompanied with some explanations so the
|
||||
submitter has directions to improve his contribution.
|
||||
used with care and if possible accompanied with some explanation so the
|
||||
submitter has directions to improve their contribution.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Pull-requests reviews should include a list of what has been reviewed in a
|
||||
Pull-request reviews should include a list of what has been reviewed in a
|
||||
comment, so other reviewers and mergers can know the state of the review.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
All the review template samples provided in this section are generic and
|
||||
meant as examples. Their usage is optional and the reviewer is free to adapt
|
||||
them to his liking.
|
||||
them to their liking.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<section>
|
||||
<title>Package updates</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
A package update is the most trivial and common type of pull-request. These
|
||||
pull-requests mainly consist in updating the version part of the package
|
||||
pull-requests mainly consist of updating the version part of the package
|
||||
name and the source hash.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
It can happen that non trivial updates include patches or more complex
|
||||
It can happen that non-trivial updates include patches or more complex
|
||||
changes.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -84,12 +88,12 @@
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Ensure that the package versioning is fitting the guidelines.
|
||||
Ensure that the package versioning fits the guidelines.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Ensure that the commit text is fitting the guidelines.
|
||||
Ensure that the commit text fits the guidelines.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
@ -99,7 +103,7 @@
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
mention-bot usually notify GitHub users based on the submitted changes,
|
||||
mention-bot usually notifies GitHub users based on the submitted changes,
|
||||
but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
@ -107,13 +111,13 @@
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Ensure that the meta field contains correct information.
|
||||
Ensure that the meta field information is correct.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
License can change with version updates, so it should be checked to be
|
||||
fitting upstream license.
|
||||
License can change with version updates, so it should be checked to match
|
||||
the upstream license.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
@ -137,9 +141,9 @@
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Pull-requests are often targeted to the master or staging branch so
|
||||
building the pull-request locally as it is submitted can trigger a large
|
||||
amount of source builds.
|
||||
Pull-requests are often targeted to the master or staging branch, and
|
||||
building the pull-request locally when it is submitted can trigger
|
||||
many source builds.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
It is possible to rebase the changes on nixos-unstable or
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user