nixpkgs/pkgs/development/libraries/haskell/bitarray/default.nix

{ cabal }:

cabal.mkDerivation (self: {
  pname = "bitarray";
  version = "0.0.1";
  sha256 = "01ijysisw70zaw70hx851axw48agfamdqj21rzzhdqd2ww6bwchb";
  meta = {
    homepage = "http://code.haskell.org/~bkomuves/";
    description = "Mutable and immutable bit arrays";
    license = self.stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;
    platforms = self.ghc.meta.platforms;
    maintainers = [ self.stdenv.lib.maintainers.andres ];
  };
})
Re-generated Haskell package descriptions with the latest version of cabal2nix. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=32327 2012-02-16 14:05:41 +00:00			`{ cabal }:`
Added haskell-{bitarray,containers-deepseq,gd}. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=31991 2012-02-03 12:15:00 +00:00
			`cabal.mkDerivation (self: {`
			`pname = "bitarray";`
			`version = "0.0.1";`
			`sha256 = "01ijysisw70zaw70hx851axw48agfamdqj21rzzhdqd2ww6bwchb";`
			`meta = {`
			`homepage = "http://code.haskell.org/~bkomuves/";`
			`description = "Mutable and immutable bit arrays";`
			`license = self.stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;`
			`platforms = self.ghc.meta.platforms;`
Removed myself as a maintainer from Haskell packages that I don't personally use. By now, it happened twice that a commit broke GHC and thus all Haskell packages we have in Nixpkgs. On such an occasion, I receive well in excess of 3000 notification e-mails from Hydra, and then I receive another 3000 e-mails after the bug has been fixed. Under these circumstances, subscribing to these notifications makes no sense for me. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=33392 2012-03-24 10:21:28 +00:00			`maintainers = [ self.stdenv.lib.maintainers.andres ];`
Added haskell-{bitarray,containers-deepseq,gd}. svn path=/nixpkgs/trunk/; revision=31991 2012-02-03 12:15:00 +00:00			`};`
			`})`