For types obtained from DWARF, we determine it from the language of the
CU. For other types, it can be specified manually or fall back to the
default (C). Then, we can use the language for operations where the type
is available.
This implements the first step at supporting C++: class types. In
particular, this adds a new drgn_type_kind, DRGN_TYPE_CLASS, and support
for parsing DW_TAG_class_type from DWARF. Although classes are not valid
in C, this adds support for pretty printing them, for completeness.
Similar to "libdrgn: make memory reader pluggable with callbacks", we
want to support custom type indexes (imagine, e.g., using drgn to parse
a binary format). For now, this disables the dwarf index tests; we'll
have a better way to test them later, so let's not bother adding more
test scaffolding.
Running tests with Clang's AddressSanitizer fails with "runtime error:
index 1 out of bounds for type 'struct drgn_type_member [0]'". Zero
length arrays are a GCC extension and aren't buying us much anyways, so
just add a helper function that gets the array payload using pointer
arithmetic.
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
