2020-05-15 23:13:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// Copyright (c) Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates.
|
2021-04-03 09:10:35 +01:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <dwarf.h>
|
2020-09-24 00:02:02 +01:00
|
|
|
#include <elfutils/libdw.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdbool.h>
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-24 00:02:02 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "path.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "util.h"
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool path_iterator_next(struct path_iterator *it, const char **component,
|
|
|
|
size_t *component_len)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
while (it->num_components) {
|
|
|
|
struct path_iterator_component *cur;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cur = &it->components[it->num_components - 1];
|
|
|
|
if (!cur->len) {
|
|
|
|
it->num_components--;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (cur->path[cur->len - 1] == '/') {
|
|
|
|
if (cur->len == 1) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* This is an absolute path. Emit an empty
|
|
|
|
* component. Components joined before this one
|
|
|
|
* and remaining ".." components are not
|
|
|
|
* meaningful.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
it->num_components = 0;
|
|
|
|
it->dot_dot = 0;
|
|
|
|
*component = "";
|
|
|
|
*component_len = 0;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Skip redundant slashes. */
|
|
|
|
cur->len--;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Skip "." components. */
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (cur->len == 1 && cur->path[0] == '.') {
|
|
|
|
it->num_components--;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (cur->len >= 2 && cur->path[cur->len - 2] == '/' &&
|
|
|
|
cur->path[cur->len - 1] == '.') {
|
|
|
|
cur->len -= 1;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Count ".." components. */
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (cur->len == 2 && cur->path[0] == '.' && cur->path[1] == '.') {
|
|
|
|
it->num_components--;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
it->dot_dot++;
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (cur->len >= 3 && cur->path[cur->len - 3] == '/' &&
|
|
|
|
cur->path[cur->len - 2] == '.' &&
|
|
|
|
cur->path[cur->len - 1] == '.') {
|
|
|
|
cur->len -= 2;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
it->dot_dot++;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Emit or skip other components. */
|
|
|
|
*component_len = 0;
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
while (cur->path[cur->len - 1] != '/') {
|
|
|
|
cur->len--;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
(*component_len)++;
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!cur->len)
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (it->dot_dot) {
|
|
|
|
it->dot_dot--;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
*component = &cur->path[cur->len];
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (it->dot_dot) {
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
* Leftover ".." components must be above the current
|
|
|
|
* directory.
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
it->dot_dot--;
|
|
|
|
*component = "..";
|
|
|
|
*component_len = 2;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
bool path_ends_with(struct path_iterator *haystack,
|
|
|
|
struct path_iterator *needle)
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
const char *h_component, *n_component;
|
|
|
|
size_t h_component_len, n_component_len;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!path_iterator_next(needle, &n_component, &n_component_len))
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!path_iterator_next(haystack, &h_component,
|
|
|
|
&h_component_len))
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (h_component_len != n_component_len ||
|
|
|
|
memcmp(h_component, n_component, h_component_len) != 0)
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool die_matches_filename(Dwarf_Die *die, const char *filename)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
struct path_iterator_component die_components[2];
|
|
|
|
struct path_iterator die_path = {
|
|
|
|
.components = die_components,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct path_iterator needle = {
|
|
|
|
.components = (struct path_iterator_component [1]){},
|
|
|
|
.num_components = 1,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Dwarf_Die cu_die;
|
|
|
|
Dwarf_Attribute attr_mem;
|
|
|
|
Dwarf_Attribute *attr;
|
|
|
|
const char *path;
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!filename || !filename[0])
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-02 07:12:12 +01:00
|
|
|
attr = dwarf_attr_integrate(dwarf_diecu(die, &cu_die, NULL, NULL),
|
|
|
|
DW_AT_comp_dir, &attr_mem);
|
|
|
|
path = dwarf_formstring(attr);
|
|
|
|
if (path) {
|
|
|
|
die_path.components[die_path.num_components].path =
|
|
|
|
path;
|
|
|
|
die_path.components[die_path.num_components].len =
|
|
|
|
strlen(path);
|
|
|
|
die_path.num_components++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
path = dwarf_decl_file(die);
|
|
|
|
if (!path)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the declaration file name is absolute, the compilation directory
|
|
|
|
* component will be ignored.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
die_path.components[die_path.num_components].path = path;
|
|
|
|
die_path.components[die_path.num_components].len = strlen(path);
|
|
|
|
die_path.num_components++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
needle.components[0].path = filename;
|
|
|
|
needle.components[0].len = strlen(filename);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return path_ends_with(&die_path, &needle);
|
Rewrite drgn core in C
The current mixed Python/C implementation works well, but it has a
couple of important limitations:
- It's too slow for some common use cases, like iterating over large
data structures.
- It can't be reused in utilities written in other languages.
This replaces the internals with a new library written in C, libdrgn. It
includes Python bindings with mostly the same public interface as
before, with some important improvements:
- Types are now represented by a single Type class rather than the messy
polymorphism in the Python implementation.
- Qualifiers are a bitmask instead of a set of strings.
- Bit fields are not considered a separate type.
- The lvalue/rvalue terminology is replaced with reference/value.
- Structure, union, and array values are better supported.
- Function objects are supported.
- Program distinguishes between lookups of variables, constants, and
functions.
The C rewrite is about 6x as fast as the original Python when using the
Python bindings, and about 8x when using the C API directly.
Currently, the exposed API in C is fairly conservative. In the future,
the memory reader, type index, and object index APIs will probably be
exposed for more flexibility.
2019-03-22 23:27:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-05-10 07:53:16 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBDRGN_PUBLIC bool drgn_filename_matches(const char *haystack,
|
|
|
|
const char *needle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct path_iterator haystack_path = {
|
|
|
|
.components = (struct path_iterator_component []){
|
|
|
|
{ haystack, strlen(haystack), }
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
.num_components = 1,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct path_iterator needle_path = {
|
|
|
|
.components = (struct path_iterator_component []){
|
|
|
|
{ needle, strlen(needle), }
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
.num_components = 1,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return path_ends_with(&haystack_path, &needle_path);
|
|
|
|
}
|